User talk:ClueBot Commons

THEY RUIN MY PAGES {, THEY R STUPID{divbox|1=blue|2=ClueBot NG Links!|3=Report False Positives • Review edits for the dataset • Frequently Asked Questions}}

The current status of ClueBot NG is: Running
Praise should go on the praise page. Barnstars and other awards should go on the awards page.
Use the "new section" button at the top of this page to add a new section. Use the [edit] link above each section to edit that section.
This page is automatically archived by ClueBot III.
The ClueBots' owner or someone else who knows the answer to your question will reply on this page.

Beware! This user's talk page is monitored by talk page watchers. Some of them even talk back.

Ciara

Hi, my edit on Ciara Discogrpahy page was by no means an attempt to vandalize. I am sorry if it looked that way but I am only new. Did you look at my source? http://hitsdailydouble.com/new_album_releases This source is the most recent announcement of the sales for the album 'Ciara' which is why I updated the sales to 208,000. I would appreciate if you would review my source and change the sales from 133,000 to 208,000. Thank you and I look forward to your feedback. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Brancott (talk • contribs) 22:01, 29 April 2015 (UTC)

CBNG is a bot. They will not answer you. Maybe ask someone else? --TL22 (talk) 23:25, 29 April 2015 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
	I am simply amazed at what this bot can do. RedPanda25 13:08, 30 April 2015 (UTC)

Hey

This user gets serious edits reverted frequently.

--Vgenapl (talk) — Preceding undated comment added 14:19, 1 May 2015 (UTC)

Music of Serbia

Why have you undone my edits? Someone added things written in already existing pages, such as huge biography of one singer, or placed turbo folk in folk music when it has nothing to do with it --95.85.150.29 (talk) 17:00, 2 May 2015 (UTC)

Hi. Please remember that ClueBot NG is a robot, not a human. If the bot has made a mistake, please report it here. --I am k6ka ^{Talk to me!} _{See what I have done} 18:35, 2 May 2015 (UTC)

ClueBot NG has a bug while reverting edits

ClueBot NG did not successfully revert a blanking edit a long time ago (August 2014). See this revision of the Sponge page and its previous revision. The section is still blanked. I don't know the reason why. It was supposed to add in the missing stuff. but it couldn't for some reason. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Fazbear7891 (talk • contribs)

I'm not sure I understand what you mean. The section "By humans" has been correctly reverted to include one image (the other image having been hidden by another editor) and a link to the main article. The section "Skeleton" has been correctly reverted to include a brief synopsis and a link to the main article. The section "Antibiotic Compounds" has been correctly reverted to include it's one line and it is currently showing. The section "Other Biologically Active Compounds" has been correctly reverted and is currently showing. "See Also" and "References" have also been correctly reverted and are showing in ClueBot NG's edit. What section are you meaning is blanked?--5 albert square (talk) 10:39, 3 May 2015 (UTC)

(Deleted reply)

What the heck?

Why am I blocked for reverting a fact? Eqqy (talk) 14:37, 3 May 2015 (UTC)

@Eqqy: You were not blocked at the time that you posted here: the mere fact that you were able to post here proved it. --Redrose64 (talk) 15:02, 3 May 2015 (UTC)

why did you delete kermit the frog!

why did you delete it was a good edit information Neynaro (talk) 16:00, 4 May 2015 (UTC)

To be honest, I don't see how edits like this could be classed as constructive to an article about a character from The Muppets. It is completely unsourced and does not appear to be anything to do with The Muppets. Maybe you meant to post it on this page instead?--5 albert square (talk) 16:08, 4 May 2015 (UTC)

Birdman

Hi, I'm tlwendt2 and I made an edit to the Birdman(film) page. The edit I recently made about the plot was no attempt of vandalism, but I was wondering if you could tell me why Cluebot NG removed it immediately? Is there any reason why no specific person made an edit to it? Thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 130.126.255.191 (talk) 17:50, 4 May 2015

Hi. The bot reverted your edit because it thought the edit was unconstructive. The bot is fully automated and is not a human, and because of its complex programming even the developers aren't 100% sure why the bot may have reverted an edit sometimes. However, while your additions were not vandalism, they still did not seem to fit in with the article because none of the material added was properly sourced, which was probably why your second edit was later undone by a human editor. --I am k6ka ^{Talk to me!} _{See what I have done} 03:27, 5 May 2015 (UTC)