Speedy deletion request declined or about I used the wrong CSD tags here

Your request to delete this talk page

I have declined your request because user talk pages are not normally deleted, see WP:DELTALK. With a few exceptions, none of which apply here, you may blank anything you like from your user talk page, including this message, but the history is retained for the record. If you want more than that, and you are leaving Wikipedia permanently, see Wikipedia:Courtesy vanishing for what you can do. Regards, JohnCD (talk) 13:25, 24 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Ok.Thx.Vvvaggot (talk) 09:41, 28 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion declined: Antonio Lacedelli

Hello Vvvaggot, and thanks for patrolling new pages! I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Antonio Lacedelli, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: came 5th in a world cup ....... You may wish to review the Criteria for Speedy Deletion before tagging further pages. Thank you. Ϣere SpielChequers 10:54, 28 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Got learned--Vvvaggot (talk)

AJ Walton

Hi. I've declined your speedy deletion as he actually seems to pass notability. I didn't believe the birth date of 1999 - and was looking to retag as hoax - but I found that he's really nine years older than that and does play pro for that club. BTW when you leave a message about a speedy nomination, please don't put the speedy template on the author's talk page. Either use Twinkle to do the nomination and notification, or write it out. You can put the db-xxx thing on, but with tlx| in front of the db to deactivate it. It's better to use Twinkle (does it automatically) or write out what you mean. Peridon (talk) 11:48, 28 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I prefer using WP:Page Curation--Vvvaggot (talk) 04:25, 29 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

DESIGNERZ FANTASY

It seems unlikely that DESIGNERZ FANTASY is a hoax article, so I've removed the hoax tag. Generally if it's an article about a company then the information is true, even if the company is not notable. Hoaxes are for articles that clearly aren't true. Joseph2302 (talk) 09:56, 29 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Wow! I don't even know that is A7...--Vvvaggot (talk)

The article doesn't say anything about why the company is important/notable, so that usually qualifies as A7.

It's also probably a G11, since it uses the term "we", which usually indicates the person writing it about their own company, to promote their company. Joseph2302 (talk) 10:01, 29 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Hello, Vvvaggot! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking

or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about Wikipedia, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field when making edits to pages. Happy editing! Babita arora 11:17, 29 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Getting Started
Contributing to Wikipedia The five pillars of Wikipedia • Tutorial • Your first article How to: edit a page • upload an image
Getting Help
Frequently Asked Questions New contributors' help page Where to: ask questions • make requests Request administrator attention
Policies and Guidelines
Neutral point of view • Reliable sources Verifiability • Citing sources • No original research What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Simplified Manual of Style • Three-revert rule Copyrights • Policy for non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism • Sock puppetry Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability

The Community
Community Portal • Adopt-a-user program Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • Resolving disputes Build consensus • Village pump IRC channels • Mailing lists Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community (The Signpost)
Things to do
Be bold in editing • Help develop an article Maintenance • Peer review • Requested articles Join a WikiProject • Translating articles Cleaning up: General • Spam • Vandalism
Miscellaneous
Categories • Disambiguity • Stubs User pages • Talk pages Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

Speedy deletion declined: Village Inece

Hello Vvvaggot, and thanks for patrolling new pages! I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Village Inece, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: villages do not qualify for A7. You may wish to review the Criteria for Speedy Deletion before tagging further pages. Thank you. Ϣere SpielChequers 13:35, 29 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

.....Vvvaggot (talk) 13:41, 29 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Username warnings

Welcome to Wikipedia and thanks for your interest in helping out at UAA. However, there's no point in both warning a user and reporting them to UAA; you should either do one or the other. If it's a blatant and serious violation, report to UAA. Otherwise, warn. See point 5 on the instructions list at the top of the UAA page. Also: when warning users for their username, be sure to specify a reason. Installing Twinkle can help you with this and other basic patrolling tasks. Again, thanks for your UAA participation. --Jakob (talk) aka Jakec 13:40, 29 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Ok,I will either do one or the other.Vvvaggot (talk) 13:42, 29 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletions

Hello. Several of your speedy deletions of new pages, such as those mentioned above, and the two foreign-language articles แคลวาโดส and as db-G3 vandalism, show that you are not yet familiar with the deletion criteria at WP:CSD. Please don't WP:BITE new users with incorrect accusations of vandalism. Please familiarise yourself with the criteria at WP:CSD before you nominate any more pages for speedy deletion. Thank you, Dai Pritchard (talk) 12:55, 30 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please also don't nominate new articles for deletion A7, two minutes after creation. Marnie Soane, for example, indicates possible notability. It would have been better to tag it with a notability tag, and give the new editor a few minutes to add info on how the subject is notable. Thanks, Dai Pritchard (talk) 12:59, 30 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

?I don't bite others!Vvvaggot (talk) Also,i don't **** user, and give out a few warnings only..Vvvaggot (talk) 13:04, 30 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I better use CSD tags carefully. Vvvaggot (talk) 13:06, 30 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I WP:BITE one "user" today,who TROLLLLLL!!!!--Vgenapl (talk)

Further case

I declined your speedy deletion of Khulhama as G3 - pure vandalism. Very poor quality, yes; unreferenced, yes; vandalism, no. WP:Vandalism is deliberate intent to do damage. Populated places are considered automatically notable, so the article has to stay and hopefully will be improved. With regards: Noyster (talk), 08:08, 2 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Ok,Next time use I will use better reason. -Vgenapl (talk) 08:12, 2 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temperance (Italian band)

Hi there, just wondering why you removed/declined the speedy on this article. --Non-Dropframe _talk 10:29, 14 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If this article or section has not been edited in several days , request deletion,-Vgenapl (talk) 10:32, 14 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Vgenapl: That doesn't really answer my question. The article qualified for speedy under WP:A7. --Non-Dropframe _talk 10:42, 14 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Copyvio notice and speedy deletion notice here

Savannah Whale

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Savannah Whale, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://en.uncyclopedia.co/wiki/Savannah_Whale.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 05:40, 30 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of REAL IDEAL HOME'

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on REAL IDEAL HOME', requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent. If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. GILO A&E⇑ 10:42, 2 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Any other message here

speedy deletion of 瑪麗亞·媞托娃

I am doing a Chinese version of Maria Titova, so how should I edit? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wanwan0402 (talk • contribs) 07:56, 30 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Not Chinese version.You should create a English version , but you MUST NOT use tools to translate the content.Vvvaggot (talk) 07:59, 30 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button ( or ) located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 08:21, 30 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

?????I ALWAYS USE TILDE TO SIGN MY POST! Vvvaggot (talk)

André Schuiteman

This page should not be speedy deleted as pure vandalism or a blatant hoax, because he is a Living botanist, reknowned in his field, with many contributions to this specific branch of science. he might not be as famous as kim kardashian but his works is Notable examples- http://www.kew.org/science-conservation/research-data/science-directory/people/schuiteman-andre, with notable contributions : http://www.researchgate.net/profile/Andre_Schuiteman http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1095-8339.2011.01183.x/abstract http://www.dw.de/global-ideas-orichidee-cambodia-kew-botanist/a-18290561 --Raabbustamante (talk) 07:39, 30 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I have unreviewed a page you curated

Hi, I'm MrX. I wanted to let you know that I saw the page you reviewed, Naujamiestis hospital, and have un-reviewed it again. If you have any questions, please ask them on my talk page. Thank you. - Mr X 11:19, 30 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

When I add a ADVERT tag , the page will be "reviewed" (NOt Reviewed By me)!--Vvvaggot (talk) 11:21, 30 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I know. Unfortunately, I didn't send you this message; the reviewing gadget did. You can disregard it.- Mr X 11:23, 30 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please explain why you have pinned my page for deletion. (Also is this where o send you messages I am new)

Hello Please can you explain why you have requested my page be deleted If it is for the lack of sources I am searching for them and the page is heavy WIP Yours sincerely Ahine33 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ahine33 (talk • contribs)

Wait..Vgenapl (talk)

13:46, 1 May 2015 Kelapstick (talk | contribs) deleted page User:Ahine33/Charley Rattue (G7: One author who has requested deletion or blanked the page (CSDH)) --Vgenapl (talk) 14:03, 1 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

It is because you blanked your article , so G7 is right.--Vgenapl (talk)

Your Recent Edits

Hi , Its great that your contributing to Wikipedia, your recent actions forced me to suggest :

1. Don’t rush to check the newly created article give some time, the editor may be still working on it. Its always a best practice to patrol pages from down to up.
2. Be cautious while using CSD.

Keep learning and doing the good work. One life to live (talk) 14:42, 1 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I can see you do useful work patrolling new pages, but today again you nominated an article for speedy deletion as A3 (no content), just one minute after it was first put up. In this case the editor had actually placed a {{newpage}} notice asking Please do not rush to mark it for deletion!

Please take note of the guidance here: Consensus has developed that in most cases articles should not be tagged for deletion under this criterion moments after creation as the creator may be actively working on the content; though there is no set time requirement, a ten-minute delay before tagging under this criterion is suggested as good practice. Please re-read the advice just above, and give editors a chance - you risk deterring valuable new contributors. Thank you: Noyster (talk), 17:17, 2 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A question about one of your recent edits

Hello! I noticed that you removed IP editor 122.50.232.41's question from the Teahouse questions page in this edit, even though it seems to me to be a genuine question and not a misplaced edit or vandalism. Could you explain why? I'm just curious, is all. CabbagePotato (talk) 07:03, 2 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

My experience with reporting usernames

Hi Vgenapl. As a longtime reporter to WP:UAA, I thought I would share my experience with reporting username violations and their outcomes. If a user has:

No contributions, the UAA admins will not do anything. If you suspect a username violation on a user with no edit history, try using the {{uw-username}} template on their user talk page. You could also suggest they visit WP:CHUS to change their username. Often, users with these types of account names are unaware that they've done anything wrong.
Only made a draft article, but has not contributed to the main article space, then it would be appropriate to leave them with a {{uw-coi-username}} warning. This will put them in the UAA holding pen that has a period of two weeks for evaluation. The warning message should give them sufficient time to offer a defense or change their username.
Made a blatantly promotional mainspace article, userpage or user sandbox, and there is a clear connection between their edits and their username, then reporting them to WP:UAA is appropriate.

There can be some ambiguity in some cases, so use your best judgement. Thanks for stepping up and helping enforce the username policy. --Drm310 (talk) 07:04, 2 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Edit Evelina Vorontsova

Dear Vgenapl,

You undid my edit for the Evelina Vorontsova page. Could you give me any information on what might have been offensive, since you tagged it as "vandalism"? (This is the first time I edited something, and I'd like to learn, since I plan to do some more articles on Russian/Dutch cultural life) I have tried to report only mere facts which any concert pianist writes in his or her biographies, and since I was not fully done with the references it was a work in progress.

Sincerely, Toeters_en_bellen (talk) 11:01, 2 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

No, I don't think it is vandalism,and I am not using that reason to revert you.--Vgenapl (talk) 11:05, 2 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Advising newbies

Hi. It was helpful to move User:Ziggymallia/Roam Free Passport (A book by Cicada Books) to a subpage rather than tag it for deletion, but you need to explain to the user what you have done - he may well not know what has happened or how to find it. Also, where the user has had no messages at all (red-linked talk page) it is helpful to start by giving {{welcome}} or one of the other standard welcome messages, which give a few useful links like WP:YFA to help them do better. Regards, JohnCD (talk) 11:03, 3 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I have unreviewed a page you curated

Hi, I'm Anarchyte. I wanted to let you know that I saw the page you reviewed, Balibandha, and have un-reviewed it again. If you have any questions, please ask them on my talk page. Thank you. Anarchyte (talk) 11:46, 4 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]