Jump to content

Talk:Robot: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Browse history interactively
← Previous editNext edit →
Content deleted Content added
VisualWikitext
→‎Cybermen: new section
Line 95: Line 95:
<ref>www.thinklabs.in</ref>
<ref>www.thinklabs.in</ref>
:[[File:Red information icon with gradient background.svg|20px|link=]] '''Not done:''' please establish a [[Wikipedia:Consensus|consensus]] for this alteration before using the {{tlx|edit semi-protected}} template.<!-- Template:ESp --> The scope of this article is to provide general information on robots, not a listing of all the robotics systems available on the market. I think the only robots that should be specifically mentioned are those that had a major impact on the history of robotics, but I can't even find a Wikipedia article on the iPitara Kit. [[User:Altamel|Altamel]] ([[User talk:Altamel|talk]]) 17:34, 16 May 2015 (UTC)
:[[File:Red information icon with gradient background.svg|20px|link=]] '''Not done:''' please establish a [[Wikipedia:Consensus|consensus]] for this alteration before using the {{tlx|edit semi-protected}} template.<!-- Template:ESp --> The scope of this article is to provide general information on robots, not a listing of all the robotics systems available on the market. I think the only robots that should be specifically mentioned are those that had a major impact on the history of robotics, but I can't even find a Wikipedia article on the iPitara Kit. [[User:Altamel|Altamel]] ([[User talk:Altamel|talk]]) 17:34, 16 May 2015 (UTC)

== Cybermen ==

''"(See The Terminator, Runaway, RoboCop, the Replicators in Stargate, the Cylons in Battlestar Galactica, the Cybermen in Doctor Who, The Matrix, Enthiran and I, Robot.)"''

Cybermen are not robots, the whole point of them is that they are biological creatures who have changed themselves to the point where they are almost robots - but also definitely ''not'' robots.

A better example from Doctor Who would be the Mechonoids/Mechanoids which effectively built their own society despite being created by humans to serve them.

[[Special:Contributions/86.171.224.170|86.171.224.170]] ([[User talk:86.171.224.170|talk]]) 23:37, 24 May 2015 (UTC)

Revision as of 23:37, 24 May 2015

Template:Vital article

Former good articleRobot was one of the Engineering and technology good articles, but it has been removed from the list. There are suggestions below for improving the article to meet the good article criteria. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
September 9, 2007WikiProject A-class reviewReviewed
December 2, 2007Good article nomineeListed
October 4, 2008Good article reassessmentDelisted
October 5, 2008WikiProject A-class reviewNot approved
Current status: Delisted good article

References


Contemporary uses

Criminal activity

Some vehicles are being used for illegal drug traffick. For example submarines have allready been created for this purpose.

Add in article

source? --danthemango (talk) 23:14, 3 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

RoboEarth ?

shouldn't we need to mention this in the article ? See RoboEarth — Preceding unsigned comment added by [[User:{{{1}}}|{{{1}}}]] ([[User talk:{{{1}}}|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/{{{1}}}|contribs]])

No this is a hardly noticeable EU project. Even mentioning it would give it undue attention. Arnoutf (talk) 14:58, 25 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 19 November 2014

--122.176.122.121 (talk) 09:16, 19 November 2014 (UTC)--122.176.122.121 (talk) 09:16, 19 November 2014 (UTC)--122.176.122.121 (talk) 09:16, 19 November 2014 (UTC)--122.176.122.121 (talk) 09:16, 19 November 2014 (UTC)--122.176.122.121 (talk) 09:16, 19 November 2014 (UTC)--122.176.122.121 (talk) 09:16, 19 November 2014 (UTC)--122.176.122.121 (talk) 09:16, 19 November 2014 (UTC)--122.176.122.121 (talk) 09:16, 19 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Etymology.

Etymology Word rob means in Czech "let's work" and5s ot is common end in Czech for masculine noun. Word robot mean command somebody else to work. Adambavlna1 (talk) 18:55, 11 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done as explained in the etymology section, it is from the Czech robota (“drudgery, servitude”) - "Karel Čapek himself did not coin the word. He wrote a short letter in reference to an etymology in the Oxford English Dictionary." - so, the person who invented the word explained it - that is the origin we will stick with. - Arjayay (talk) 19:14, 11 January 2015 (UTC) I was not writing about who coin the word. I was writing about Czech language explanation bout Karel Capek and his brother Josef used czech language. Your answer is big misunderstanding. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Adambavlna1 (talk • contribs) 19:39, 11 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Etymology of word robot.

Word rob means in Czech "let's work" and ot is common end in Czech for masculine noun. Word robot mean command somebody else to work. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Adambavlna1 (talk • contribs) 18:57, 11 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 20 January 2015

Another explanation word robot is rob means in Czech "let's work" and ot is a common end in Czech for masculine noun. I dont understand this t's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format. Absolutely do not understand. Adambavlna1 (talk) 18:22, 20 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format.  B E C K Y S A Y L E S  18:35, 20 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 30 January 2015

I think this following link should be placed within the section "External Links": https://robots.zeef.com/roberta.roboter0 Lehmos (talk) 12:55, 30 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Not done: This does not look like a WP:RS. Seems to perfectly fit WP:ELNO Cannolis (talk) 14:03, 30 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 16 May 2015

in educational robotics we have another product , widely using in india known as "iPitara Kit" 183.82.103.121 (talk) 13:05, 16 May 2015 (UTC) [1][reply]

Not done: please establish a consensus for this alteration before using the {{edit semi-protected}} template. The scope of this article is to provide general information on robots, not a listing of all the robotics systems available on the market. I think the only robots that should be specifically mentioned are those that had a major impact on the history of robotics, but I can't even find a Wikipedia article on the iPitara Kit. Altamel (talk) 17:34, 16 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Cybermen

"(See The Terminator, Runaway, RoboCop, the Replicators in Stargate, the Cylons in Battlestar Galactica, the Cybermen in Doctor Who, The Matrix, Enthiran and I, Robot.)"

Cybermen are not robots, the whole point of them is that they are biological creatures who have changed themselves to the point where they are almost robots - but also definitely not robots.

A better example from Doctor Who would be the Mechonoids/Mechanoids which effectively built their own society despite being created by humans to serve them.

86.171.224.170 (talk) 23:37, 24 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  1. ^ www.thinklabs.in
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Robot&oldid=663871712"