Jump to content

Talk:Chinese expedition to Tibet (1910): Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Cartakes (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
m 6-A04-W96-K38-S41-V38 moved page Talk:Chinese expedition to Tibet (1910) to Talk:Chinese invasion of Tibet (1910) over redirect: Move back to former title. Analogy given to justify the move was an article created 1 minute earlier by the same co...
(No difference)

Revision as of 00:16, 10 August 2015

WikiProject iconTibet Stub‑class Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Tibet, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Tibet on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
StubThis article has been rated as Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.
WikiProject iconChina Stub‑class Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject China, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of China related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
StubThis article has been rated as Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Zhao Erfeng, 1905_Tibetan_Rebellion#Retaliatory_expeditions

http://mcx.sagepub.com/content/34/2/210.short

http://www.jstor.org/discover/10.2307/20062699?uid=2460338175&uid=2460337935&uid=2&uid=4&uid=83&uid=63&sid=21104393026907

The Men Who Would Not Be Amban and the One Who Would: Four Frontline Officials and Qing Tibet Policy, 1905-1911 Dahpon David Ho Modern China Vol. 34, No. 2 (Apr., 2008), pp. 210-246 Published by: Sage Publications, Inc. Article Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/20062699

Rajmaan (talk) 05:26, 26 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]