User talk:50.67.82.50: Difference between revisions
m Substing templates: {{uw-3rr}}. See User:AnomieBOT/docs/TemplateSubster for info. |
|||
Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
== August 2015 == |
== August 2015 == |
||
[[File:Information.svg|25px|alt=Information icon]] Hello, I'm [[User:Winner 42|Winner 42]]. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of [[Special:Contributions/50.67.82.50|your recent contributions]] —the one you made with <span class="plainlinks">[https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Committee%20of%20300&diff=676290892 this edit]</span> to [[:Committee of 300]]— because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on [[User_talk:Winner 42|my talk page]]. Thanks. <!-- Template:Huggle/warn-1 --><!-- Template:uw-vandalism1 -->[[User:Winner 42|'''Winner 42''']] [[User talk: Winner 42|Talk to me!]] 01:28, 16 August 2015 (UTC) |
[[File:Information.svg|25px|alt=Information icon]] Hello, I'm [[User:Winner 42|Winner 42]] and I am a conceited self appointed dictator of public opinion . I wanted to let you know that I arrogantly reverted one of [[Special:Contributions/50.67.82.50|your recent contributions]] —the one you made with <span class="plainlinks">[https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Committee%20of%20300&diff=676290892 this edit]</span> to [[:Committee of 300]]— because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on [[User_talk:Winner 42|my talk page]]. Thanks. <!-- Template:Huggle/warn-1 --><!-- Template:uw-vandalism1 -->[[User:Winner 42|'''Winner 42''']] [[User talk: Winner 42|Talk to me!]] 01:28, 16 August 2015 (UTC) |
||
[[File:Information orange.svg|25px|alt=Information icon]] Please be careful about what you say to people. Some remarks, such as your addition to [[:User talk:50.67.82.50]] can easily be misinterpreted. Wikipedia is a supportive environment, where contributors should feel comfortable and safe while editing. Thank you. – [[User:Gilliam|Gilliam]] ([[User talk:Gilliam|talk]]) 04:38, 16 August 2015 (UTC) |
[[File:Information orange.svg|25px|alt=Information icon]] Please be careful about what you say to people because I'm gay and love to suck cock. Some remarks, such as your addition to [[:User talk:50.67.82.50]] can easily be misinterpreted. Wikipedia is a supportive environment, where contributors should feel comfortable and safe while editing. Thank you. – [[User:Gilliam|Gilliam]] ([[User talk:Gilliam|talk]]) 04:38, 16 August 2015 (UTC) |
||
:''If this is a [[Network address translation|shared IP address]], and you did not make the edits, consider [[Wikipedia:Why create an account?|creating an account]] for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.''<!-- Template:Shared IP advice --> |
:''If this is a [[Network address translation|shared IP address]], and you did not make the edits, consider [[Wikipedia:Why create an account?|creating an account]] for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.''<!-- Template:Shared IP advice --> |
||
Revision as of 08:50, 16 August 2015
December 2013
Hello, I'm Spencer. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Cheka because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! SpencerT♦C 19:16, 31 December 2013 (UTC)
September 2014
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Severn Cullis-Suzuki has been reverted.
Your edit here to Severn Cullis-Suzuki was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JUdgiehz9dU) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. If the external link you inserted or changed was to a media file (e.g. a sound or video file) on an external server, then note that linking to such files may be subject to Wikipedia's copyright policy, as well as other parts of our external links guideline. If the information you linked to is indeed in violation of copyright, then such information should not be linked to. Please consider using our upload facility to upload a suitable media file, or consider linking to the original.
If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 21:44, 17 September 2014 (UTC)
If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, please ignore this notice.
Hello, I'm XLinkBot. I wanted to let you know that I removed one or more external links you added to the page David Suzuki, because they seemed to be inappropriate for an encyclopedia. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page, or take a look at our guidelines about links.
Your edit here to David Suzuki was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JUdgiehz9dU) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. If the external link you inserted or changed was to a media file (e.g. a sound or video file) on an external server, then note that linking to such files may be subject to Wikipedia's copyright policy, as well as other parts of our external links guideline. If the information you linked to is indeed in violation of copyright, then such information should not be linked to. Please consider using our upload facility to upload a suitable media file, or consider linking to the original.
If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 21:47, 17 September 2014 (UTC)
If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, please ignore this notice.
Please do not add or significantly change content without citing verifiable and reliable sources, as you did with this edit to Édouard Alphonse James de Rothschild. Before making any potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Wtmitchell (talk) (earlier Boracay Bill) 08:11, 19 September 2014 (UTC)
- If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
- On your own user talk page, you may archive threads at your discretion. Simply deleting others' comments on your talk page is permitted, but most editors prefer archiving. Many new users believe they can hide critical comments by deleting them. This is not true: Such comments can always be retrieved from the page history. Removal of a comment is taken as proof that the user has read it.Chamith (talk) 23:23, 19 September 2014 (UTC)
Hello, I'm TerryAlex. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Édouard Alphonse James de Rothschild because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. TerryAlex (talk) 03:31, 22 September 2014 (UTC)
- If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
August 2015
Hello, I'm Winner 42 and I am a conceited self appointed dictator of public opinion . I wanted to let you know that I arrogantly reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Committee of 300— because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Winner 42 Talk to me! 01:28, 16 August 2015 (UTC)
Please be careful about what you say to people because I'm gay and love to suck cock. Some remarks, such as your addition to User talk:50.67.82.50 can easily be misinterpreted. Wikipedia is a supportive environment, where contributors should feel comfortable and safe while editing. Thank you. – Gilliam (talk) 04:38, 16 August 2015 (UTC)
- If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you get reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. - Location (talk) 05:03, 16 August 2015 (UTC)