User talk:Iflex: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 04:06, 16 September 2015

Hello, Iflex, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages you might find helpful:

Introduction
The five pillars of Wikipedia
How to edit a page
How to write a great article
Manual of Style
Also feel free to make test edits in the sandbox.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to leave me a message. Tikiwont 10:02, 1 June 2007 (UTC) I noticed that you've blanked your talk page. The impact of warnings, other editors comments and the like can indeed be initially (and also later) irritating here, so I've added above welcome message that so far was missing. The messages, however, serve an important purpose and it is thus considered to be better to archive them rather than blanking the page unlesse it si a personal attack. Pleas have a look at my talk page to see, how it would look like. If you want, I'll help you setting up an archive. Tikiwont 10:02, 1 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Signature anagram

A tag has been placed on Signature anagram, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag) and leave a note on the page's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself.

If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do. Feel free to leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Kubek15^{(Sign!) (Contribs) (UBX)} 08:51, 9 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for File:Korom cat.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Korom cat.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from or who created it. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 16:12, 16 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:Korom barber.jpg

File Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading File:Korom barber.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 18:57, 16 April 2009 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. →Na gy 18:57, 16 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for File:CUP-Bathinda.JPG

Thanks for uploading File:CUP-Bathinda.JPG. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information; to add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia.

For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 13:07, 2 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:Umb.jpg

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Umb.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. —Bkell (talk) 16:14, 3 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 2

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Kyokutenhō Masaru, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Yokozuna and Kokugikan (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:09, 2 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 24

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Central University of Punjab, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page CLSM (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:53, 24 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

October 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Sea lettuce may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

of bloom-forming tubular Ulva in Indian west coast, with description of Ulva paschima Sp. Nov. (Ulvales, Chlorophyta. [http://www.plosone.org/article/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0109295

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 05:32, 22 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

June 2015

Hello, I'm Figureskatingfan. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to History of Sesame Street because they appeared to be promotional. Advertising and using Wikipedia as a "soapbox" are against Wikipedia policy and not permitted. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thank you. Christine (Figureskatingfan) (talk) 15:51, 22 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Page:Internal transcribed spacer

Your addition "ITS and organismal life history" is confusing and does not seem to add essential information to the page. Consider moving it to the page Monostroma latissimum. Fleliaer (talk) 20:29, 25 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

FundsIndia

Your changes seem to have been reverted. Please discuss them further at Talk:FundsIndia. Karl Dickman ^talk 09:24, 15 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You need to stop. See WP:3RR and the talk page. Your edits are way outside the bounds of normal Wikipedia acceptance. @Karl Dickman:. -- GreenC 12:35, 15 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked for violating the three-revert rule. Karl Dickman ^talk 00:02, 16 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

This user is asking that their block be reviewed:

Iflex (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

The whole of FundsIndia's article violates WP:PROMOTION and WP:SOAP. My edits are based on numerous legal litigations filed against the firm available over internet, which are of course primary. Even the FundsIndia article makes numerous references to their own website, for example reference 23, which is a clear violation of WP:NOPV I see that most of the advertising sections of the article removed, for which I appreciate you. Please remove my block, I won't revert your changes again.Iflex (talk) 04:06, 16 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Notes:

In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.

Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=The whole of FundsIndia's article violates WP:PROMOTION and WP:SOAP. My edits are based on numerous legal litigations filed against the firm available over internet, which are of course primary. Even the FundsIndia article makes numerous references to their own website, for example reference 23, which is a clear violation of WP:NOPV I see that most of the advertising sections of the article removed, for which I appreciate you. Please remove my block, I won't revert your changes again.[[User:Iflex|Iflex]] ([[User talk:Iflex#top|talk]]) 04:06, 16 September 2015 (UTC) |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=The whole of FundsIndia's article violates WP:PROMOTION and WP:SOAP. My edits are based on numerous legal litigations filed against the firm available over internet, which are of course primary. Even the FundsIndia article makes numerous references to their own website, for example reference 23, which is a clear violation of WP:NOPV I see that most of the advertising sections of the article removed, for which I appreciate you. Please remove my block, I won't revert your changes again.[[User:Iflex|Iflex]] ([[User talk:Iflex#top|talk]]) 04:06, 16 September 2015 (UTC) |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=The whole of FundsIndia's article violates WP:PROMOTION and WP:SOAP. My edits are based on numerous legal litigations filed against the firm available over internet, which are of course primary. Even the FundsIndia article makes numerous references to their own website, for example reference 23, which is a clear violation of WP:NOPV I see that most of the advertising sections of the article removed, for which I appreciate you. Please remove my block, I won't revert your changes again.[[User:Iflex|Iflex]] ([[User talk:Iflex#top|talk]]) 04:06, 16 September 2015 (UTC) |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}

@@ Line 72: / Line 72: @@
 You have been blocked for violating the three-revert rule. [[User:Karl Dickman|Karl&nbsp;Dickman]]&nbsp;[[User talk:Karl Dickman|<sup>talk</sup>]] 00:02, 16 September 2015 (UTC)
 <div class="user-block" style="min-height: 40px"> [[File:Stop x nuvola with clock.svg|40px|left|alt=Stop icon with clock]] You have been '''[[WP:Blocking policy|blocked]]''' temporarily from editing for [[WP:Disruptive editing|abuse of editing privileges]].  Once the block has expired, you are welcome to [[WP:Five pillars|make useful contributions]]. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may [[WP:Appealing a block|appeal this block]] by first reading the [[WP:Guide to appealing blocks|guide to appealing blocks]], then adding the following text below this notice: <!-- Copy the text as it appears on your page, not as it appears in this edit area. Do not include the "tlx|" code. -->{{tlx|unblock|2=reason=''Your reason here &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126;''}}. </div><!-- Template:uw-block -->
+{{unblock|reason=The whole of FundsIndia's article violates WP:PROMOTION and WP:SOAP. My edits are based on numerous legal litigations filed against the firm available over internet, which are of course primary. Even the FundsIndia article makes numerous references to their own website, for example reference 23, which is a clear violation of WP:NOPV I see that most of the advertising sections of the article removed, for which I appreciate you. Please remove my block, I won't revert your changes again.[[User:Iflex|Iflex]] ([[User talk:Iflex#top|talk]]) 04:06, 16 September 2015 (UTC)}}