Jump to content

User talk:ReseARTch: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
ReseARTch (talk | contribs)
ReseARTch (talk | contribs)
Tag: speedy deletion template removed
Line 77: Line 77:
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the [[Wikipedia:Proposed deletion|proposed deletion process]], but other [[Wikipedia:deletion process|deletion process]]es exist. In particular, the [[Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion|speedy deletion]] process can result in deletion without discussion, and [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion|articles for deletion]] allows discussion to reach [[Wikipedia:Consensus|consensus]] for deletion.<!-- Template:Proposed deletion notify --> [[User:Randykitty|Randykitty]] ([[User talk:Randykitty|talk]]) 07:14, 18 September 2015 (UTC)
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the [[Wikipedia:Proposed deletion|proposed deletion process]], but other [[Wikipedia:deletion process|deletion process]]es exist. In particular, the [[Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion|speedy deletion]] process can result in deletion without discussion, and [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion|articles for deletion]] allows discussion to reach [[Wikipedia:Consensus|consensus]] for deletion.<!-- Template:Proposed deletion notify --> [[User:Randykitty|Randykitty]] ([[User talk:Randykitty|talk]]) 07:14, 18 September 2015 (UTC)


I agree, I cannot find this journal indexed on any "selective" databases and therefore does not meet [[WP:NJournals]]. Although I do not believe any art journals would be featured in the databases proposed in [[WP:NJournals]]. I disagree that there are no "independent" sources cited, the [[Austrian Science Fund]], [[transmediale]] and [[ISEA]] are all reliable established independent sources that utilise rigorous peer review processes. However due to the newness of this journal I would also agree does not meet [[WP:GNG]] and therefore I agree with the proposed deletion. {{db-xfd}} [[User:ReseARTch|ReseARTch]] ([[User talk:ReseARTch#top|talk]]) 13:33, 18 September 2015 (UTC)
I agree, I cannot find this journal indexed on any "selective" databases and therefore does not meet [[WP:NJournals]]. Although I do not believe any art journals would be featured in the databases proposed in [[WP:NJournals]]. I disagree that there are no "independent" sources cited, the [[Austrian Science Fund]], [[transmediale]] and [[ISEA]] are all reliable established independent sources that utilise rigorous peer review processes. However due to the newness of this journal I would also agree does not meet [[WP:GNG]] and therefore I agree with the proposed deletion.[[User:ReseARTch|ReseARTch]] ([[User talk:ReseARTch#top|talk]]) 13:33, 18 September 2015 (UTC)

Revision as of 13:34, 18 September 2015

Welcome!

Hello, ReseARTch! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about Wikipedia, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field when making edits to pages. Happy editing! I dream of horses If you reply here, please ping me by adding {{Ping|I dream of horses}} to your message. (talk to me) (contributions) @ 17:50, 17 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Getting Started
Getting Help
Policies and Guidelines

The Community
Things to do
Miscellaneous

Proposed deletion of Journal for research cultures

The article Journal for research cultures has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable new journal. Not indexed in any selective databases, no independent sources. Does not meet WP:NJournals or WP:GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Randykitty (talk) 07:14, 18 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I agree, I cannot find this journal indexed on any "selective" databases and therefore does not meet WP:NJournals. Although I do not believe any art journals would be featured in the databases proposed in WP:NJournals. I disagree that there are no "independent" sources cited, the Austrian Science Fund, transmediale and ISEA are all reliable established independent sources that utilise rigorous peer review processes. However due to the newness of this journal I would also agree does not meet WP:GNG and therefore I agree with the proposed deletion.ReseARTch (talk) 13:33, 18 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]