Jump to content

Talk:Venus (Marvel Comics): Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Add WikiProject Fictional Characters
Line 48: Line 48:


:::I agree, it makes sense but I hesitate to do it without an official source. -[[User:TriiipleThreat|TriiipleThreat]] ([[User talk:TriiipleThreat|talk]]) 13:09, 26 January 2010 (UTC)
:::I agree, it makes sense but I hesitate to do it without an official source. -[[User:TriiipleThreat|TriiipleThreat]] ([[User talk:TriiipleThreat|talk]]) 13:09, 26 January 2010 (UTC)

The true Goddess is the one that debuts in the 40s in the comic Venus, using her roman name. The siren is the one that debuts in Agents of Atlas. It hasn't be 100% confirmed, however there are MAJOR pointers such as the Cestus which is the biggest giveaway following the retcon. During their battle in 2011, the true Goddess Aphrodite GIVES the cestus to the siren, handing over her mantle, meaning it was in the possession of the real Goddess all this time. And in the 40s Venus can be seen with the Cestus also, throughout the publication. So it can very safely be assumed that it was in fact Aphrodite that debuted in the 40s, the real Goddess.

Another big pointer is the established powers. In the 40s Venus displays alot of powers that she actually doesnt have, however the Goddess does, such as teleporting. These are then established to help illustrate the difference between the two in 2009 when Venus is pretty much helpless against the real Goddess when she confronts her for the first time in her temple.

I know again that it isn't 100% confirmed. However those pointers, especially the fact that the cestus was always in Aphrodites possession, is pretty much a confirmed retcon that it was actually Aphrodite. The Marvel Wikia has also taken note of this and changed the histories around so that it was Aphrodite that debuted in the 40s following this revelation too.

Revision as of 11:22, 20 September 2015

WikiProject iconComics: Marvel C‑class Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Comics, a collaborative effort to build an encyclopedic guide to comics on Wikipedia. Get involved! If you would like to participate, you can help with the current tasks, visit the notice board, edit the attached article or discuss it at the project's talk page.
CThis article has been rated as C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by Marvel Comics work group.
WikiProject iconFictional characters C‑class
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Fictional characters, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of fictional characters on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
CThis article has been rated as C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

Venus & Agents of Atlas #5

...well, that's shaken things up a bit. It might be worth waiting 'til #6 is out, but there are a number of major retcons in #5. --Mrph 23:23, 9 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Venus-comics-leonardkirk.jpg

Image:Venus-comics-leonardkirk.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 05:03, 16 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Comics B-Class Assesment required

This article needs the B-Class checklist filled in to remain a B-Class article for the Comics WikiProject. If the checklist is not filled in by 7th August this article will be re-assessed as C-Class. The checklist should be filled out referencing the guidance given at Wikipedia:Version 1.0 Editorial Team/Assessment/B-Class criteria. For further details please contact the Comics WikiProject. Comics-awb (talk) 17:55, 31 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

C-Class rated for Comics Project

As this B-Class article has yet to receive a review, it has been rated as C-Class. If you disagree and would like to request an assesment, please visit Wikipedia:WikiProject_Comics/Assessment#Requesting_an_assessment and list the article. Hiding T 14:42, 24 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Aphrodite

Do we know for certain that the goddess' first appearance was in 2009, and that all previous appearances were of the naiad? See my rationale at the comics project talk page. BOZ (talk) 23:58, 25 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

For reference here is that post from comics project talk page:

For example, looking over the appearances on this page, I'd say that the naiad is Venus #1-19 and Marvel Mystery Comics #91 (from the 40s), and Avengers #283-284 & Thor Annual #8 were definitely the goddess. Marvel: The Lost Generation #5 was a followup on the 40s character, so clearly the naiad there as well. Most of the rest of that depends upon interpretation, and really requires some clarification from the writers as to which exploits belonged to which. BOZ (talk) 05:19, 25 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

What you say here is an easy and logical assumption to make, however there has been no confirmation of this in the comic book and therefore could be considered WP:OR. I'd be okay with it if a concensus of the editors agree and then Vensus's fictional history can be sorted between the two characters. -TriiipleThreat (talk) 12:53, 26 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I'd have no idea how to separate them without some input from the writers - which I'm hoping happens at some point in Agents of Atlas and/or The Incredible Hercules; if not there, then at least an OHOTMU type handbook. I mean, there are scenes in which Venus appears in Olympus with the other gods, and I can't see them letting a siren just hang out with them for no apparent reason, while the real Venus is who knows where. I'm uncomfortable declaring most of the rest of her appearances one way or the other. I'm sure the goddess appeared long before 2009, but I can't prove it yet. BOZ (talk) 13:07, 26 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I agree, it makes sense but I hesitate to do it without an official source. -TriiipleThreat (talk) 13:09, 26 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The true Goddess is the one that debuts in the 40s in the comic Venus, using her roman name. The siren is the one that debuts in Agents of Atlas. It hasn't be 100% confirmed, however there are MAJOR pointers such as the Cestus which is the biggest giveaway following the retcon. During their battle in 2011, the true Goddess Aphrodite GIVES the cestus to the siren, handing over her mantle, meaning it was in the possession of the real Goddess all this time. And in the 40s Venus can be seen with the Cestus also, throughout the publication. So it can very safely be assumed that it was in fact Aphrodite that debuted in the 40s, the real Goddess.

Another big pointer is the established powers. In the 40s Venus displays alot of powers that she actually doesnt have, however the Goddess does, such as teleporting. These are then established to help illustrate the difference between the two in 2009 when Venus is pretty much helpless against the real Goddess when she confronts her for the first time in her temple.

I know again that it isn't 100% confirmed. However those pointers, especially the fact that the cestus was always in Aphrodites possession, is pretty much a confirmed retcon that it was actually Aphrodite. The Marvel Wikia has also taken note of this and changed the histories around so that it was Aphrodite that debuted in the 40s following this revelation too.