Jump to content

Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2015 October 3: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Line 20: Line 20:
This cannot be a good idea. Apart from redundant to {{t|uw-coi}}, these do not conform to how user warnings are normally formatted. Altrough paid editors are required to disclose their paid editing, that is not a reason for continuously warning them (probably why {{t|uw-coi}} is single-level), the paid editing should be discussed instead at [[WP:COIN]] if the user has not already disclosed their paid editing. [[User:ToonLucas22|<b style= "color:red">T</b><b style= "color:#FF4200">L</b><b style= "color:#FF7400">2</b><b style= "color:#FFA700">2</b>]] <small>([[User talk:ToonLucas22|<i style= "color:green">talk</i>]])</small> 22:40, 3 October 2015 (UTC)
This cannot be a good idea. Apart from redundant to {{t|uw-coi}}, these do not conform to how user warnings are normally formatted. Altrough paid editors are required to disclose their paid editing, that is not a reason for continuously warning them (probably why {{t|uw-coi}} is single-level), the paid editing should be discussed instead at [[WP:COIN]] if the user has not already disclosed their paid editing. [[User:ToonLucas22|<b style= "color:red">T</b><b style= "color:#FF4200">L</b><b style= "color:#FF7400">2</b><b style= "color:#FFA700">2</b>]] <small>([[User talk:ToonLucas22|<i style= "color:green">talk</i>]])</small> 22:40, 3 October 2015 (UTC)
*'''Delete''' not documented into the template warning system, and these are new templates, so they should have been. Can someone point to the Village Pump or Administration discussion that supports the creation of these? -- [[Special:Contributions/70.51.202.113|70.51.202.113]] ([[User talk:70.51.202.113|talk]]) 04:56, 4 October 2015 (UTC)
*'''Delete''' not documented into the template warning system, and these are new templates, so they should have been. Can someone point to the Village Pump or Administration discussion that supports the creation of these? -- [[Special:Contributions/70.51.202.113|70.51.202.113]] ([[User talk:70.51.202.113|talk]]) 04:56, 4 October 2015 (UTC)
*'''Comment''' how can one determine if someone's edits conform to a manner to appears as to be paid for editing, instead of some other COI issue? -- [[Special:Contributions/70.51.202.113|70.51.202.113]] ([[User talk:70.51.202.113|talk]]) 04:58, 4 October 2015 (UTC)


==== [[Template:Infobox music festival]] ====
==== [[Template:Infobox music festival]] ====

Revision as of 04:58, 4 October 2015

October 3

Uw-paid series

This cannot be a good idea. Apart from redundant to {{uw-coi}}, these do not conform to how user warnings are normally formatted. Altrough paid editors are required to disclose their paid editing, that is not a reason for continuously warning them (probably why {{uw-coi}} is single-level), the paid editing should be discussed instead at WP:COIN if the user has not already disclosed their paid editing. TL22 (talk) 22:40, 3 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The template is 100% redundant to Template:Infobox recurring event. Adding to that, it is sometimes more suitable to use the latter template, even for music festivals, since it is way better organized and has a lot more parameter that may be used for a music festival. (Since the template is protected, I'm gonna need an admin or template editor to add the deletion template to the template please. Thanks!!) r a y u k k. 17:59, 3 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Cartoon Network–specific navboxes

In the same vein as {{Cartoon Network programming}}: The navbox for pilots, films and specials is so gigantic, full of red links that aren't in the process of creation, and linkless entries that it's useless. Its purpose is better served by the categories Cartoon Network Studios animated films and Cartoon Network television films.

The function of the navbox for video games is also made redudant by the category Cartoon Network video games and list of Cartoon Network video games. (I created this template.) 23W 16:02, 3 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I've created himself the template "Cartoon Network pilots, films and specials", but only to solve the problem of a too exaggerated former template (Cartoon Network programming). Then, I am not at all agree on their inclusion of all titles in the above categories, because the template in this way is more comprehensive, functional and orderly. So keep it officially. Luigi1090 talk 23:17, 3 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Not exactly sure why this template is a stand alone or if should be merged to Hathazari Upazila article or deleted. Quis separabit? 13:45, 3 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Chronological templates are considered to be in-universe information (WP:GAMETRIVIA). For the discussion, see here. Previous video game chronology templates were deleted too. Soetermans. T / C 11:16, 3 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]