Talk:Disney Television Animation: Difference between revisions

Browse history interactively

← Previous edit Next edit →

Content deleted Content added

VisualWikitext

Inline

Revision as of 22:30, 8 October 2015

Disney Start‑class

	Disney portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Disney, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of The Walt Disney Company and its affiliated companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DisneyWikipedia:WikiProject DisneyTemplate:WikiProject DisneyDisney articles
Start	This article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Television Start‑class Low‑importance

	Television portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
Start	This article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

‹ The template below (WikiProject Animation) is being considered for merging. See templates for discussion to help reach a consensus. ›

Animation: American Start‑class Mid‑importance

	Animation portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Animation, a collaborative effort to build an encyclopedic guide to animation on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, help out with the open tasks, or contribute to the discussion.AnimationWikipedia:WikiProject AnimationTemplate:WikiProject AnimationAnimation articles
Start	This article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the American animation work group (assessed as Mid-importance).

NPOV

Regarding Funny Story About Barry Blumberg and the "Spirit of Tom Ruzicka"

This does not seem to reflect a Neutral Point of View, should it be removed from the article?

TV content ratings

Per WP:MOSTV, the content ratings for the programs have been removed. These ratings would only apply in the United States, and certainly wouldn't appear on a Malaysian TV program that has never aired in the United States. If you believe these ratings are notable, please provide your opinions and citations of policy and of the ratings themselves. The latter especially, since many of these shows predate the American content ratings. --McDoob AU93 21:52, 2 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hey McDoobAU93, I agree with this removal. For the benefit of the contributors, the inclusion of this information is problematic for a few reasons, one of them being verifiability. There are virtually no sources presented for this information outside of the primary sources, and we can't base the bulk of our content on primary sources, i.e. the show itself. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 00:48, 3 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Leroy & Stitch

Wasn't Leroy & Stitch a direct-to-video/DVD film? 71.95.53.89 (talk) 02:40, 24 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

According to Leroy & Stitch, it premiered on Disney Channel a few days before its DVD release.--Carniolus (talk) 21:32, 24 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Silent edit war

@Mister134: and @Mkrgolf:, would you please do a favor for the rest of the editors who have this article watchlisted and actually discuss the edit war you are currently engaged in, instead of silently changing and reverting?

Mister134: [1][2][3][4]
Mkrgolf: [5][6][7][8][9]

This constant back and forth is disruptive. This is a community project, and we discuss changes with one another. Adding unsourced content doesn't make the project any stronger or any more accurate, and reverting to previous versions of unsourced content doesn't particularly help either. You both have to step up and start adding sources and using edit summaries. Thanks. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 16:15, 23 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 1 February 2015

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

Playhouse Disney/Disney Junior original series

Title	Original running	Notes
PB&J Otter	1998–2000	co-production with Jumbo Pictures
Mickey Mouse Clubhouse	2006–present
My Friends Tigger & Pooh	2007–2010
Special Agent Oso	2009–2012
Jake and the Never Land Pirates	2011–present
Sofia the First	2012–present
The Adventures of Disney Fairies	2014–present
The Lion Guard^[1]	2015-present
The Muppet Babies	2016	co-production with Jim Henson Animation

109.9.5.158 (talk) 16:04, 1 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Not done: as you have not cited reliable sources to back up your request, without which no information should be added to, or changed in, any article. - Arjayay (talk) 16:08, 1 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 8 July 2015

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

Disney TVA recently launched a new website for recruiting talent. We should add this to the Websites: http://dtvatalent.disney.com/ Ninmura (talk) 21:03, 8 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

What encyclopedic value does that add to the article? Many companies have online recruitment - in fact, I would say that the vast majority of companies notable enough to have a Wikipedia article have an online recruitment tool somewhere. We're not here to advertise for them, and Disney is no different. ‑‑ElHef (Meep?) 21:37, 8 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Fully concur with user ElHep. Non-notable. It's like saying that John Lasseter wears a shirt. So does everyone else. (As opposed to the fact that Lasseter primarily wears only Hawaiian shirts and owns over a thousand of them, which is notable.) --Coolcaesar (talk) 06:40, 9 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

It's not so much about encyclopedic value, but having the the data in the infobox be current and valid. The current "Website" link points to a dead link.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Ninmura (talk • contribs)

The dead link has now been removed. Stickee (talk) 04:16, 13 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

How about Rugrats and Jimmy Neutron: Boy Genius?

Rugrats and Jimmy Neutron: Boy Genius are NOT produced by Disney Television Animation, they are produced by Nickelodeon Studios.

^ "Disney Channel Preps New 'Lion King' Series, TV Movie Franchise". Variety. June 10, 2014. Retrieved June 13, 2014.

[1] "Disney Channel Preps New 'Lion King' Series, TV Movie Franchise". Variety. June 10, 2014. Retrieved June 13, 2014.

[1]

@@ Line 77: / Line 77: @@
 ::It's not so much about encyclopedic value, but having the the data in the infobox be current and valid. The current "Website" link points to a dead link.<small><span class="autosigned">—&nbsp;Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Ninmura|Ninmura]] ([[User talk:Ninmura|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Ninmura|contribs]]) </span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned -->
 :::The dead link has now been removed. [[User:Stickee|Stickee]] <small>[[User talk:Stickee|(talk)]]</small> 04:16, 13 August 2015 (UTC)
+== How about ''Rugrats'' and ''Jimmy Neutron: Boy Genius''? ==
+''Rugrats'' and ''Jimmy Neutron: Boy Genius'' are NOT produced by Disney Television Animation, they are produced by Nickelodeon Studios.