Jump to content

Talk:Art: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
m Archiving 2 discussion(s) to Talk:Art/Archive 3) (bot
art: Vandalism
Line 39: Line 39:
==Principles of Art==
==Principles of Art==
Principles of Art redirects here, yet the principles of art are nowhere contained on this page. Should we copy the information from Principles of Art to this article? [[User:Jjnishiyama|Jjnishiyama]] ([[User talk:Jjnishiyama|talk]]) 17:23, 2 October 2015 (UTC)
Principles of Art redirects here, yet the principles of art are nowhere contained on this page. Should we copy the information from Principles of Art to this article? [[User:Jjnishiyama|Jjnishiyama]] ([[User talk:Jjnishiyama|talk]]) 17:23, 2 October 2015 (UTC)

== art ==

honey suckle on your nipples and sex <small class="autosigned">—&nbsp;Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/70.119.142.80|70.119.142.80]] ([[User talk:70.119.142.80|talk]]) 22:37, 2 October 2015 (UTC)</small><!-- Template:Unsigned IP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->

Revision as of 18:12, 20 October 2015

Former good article nomineeArt was a Art and architecture good articles nominee, but did not meet the good article criteria at the time. There may be suggestions below for improving the article. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
August 16, 2006Good article nomineeNot listed

Template:Vital article Template:Outline of knowledge coverage


Richard Wollheim's distinctions

Richard Wollheim's distinctions of views on art as either 'realistic', 'objectivistic' or 'relativistic' may be said to be pertaining to, even symptomatic of the predominantly anglo-american school of Analytic philosophy, as opposed to the Continental philosophy; the proposed other major stream in the currents of occidental philosophy. If this is acknowledged it is problematic that the wikipedia article on art, in its current reading, frames art in this fashion. That is predominantly because of the current position in the article of Richard Wollheims distinctions . I will argue that it is at odds with the neutrality policy. In the extension of this argument, one should seek to adapt the habit of adressing the cultural position of information. This can be done in a simple and elegant way without problem; for instant. in the context of analytical philosophy, Richard Wollheim suggests three different views on arts practices...— Preceding unsigned comment added by Xact (talkcontribs) 12:16, 23 September 2009

Principles of Art

Principles of Art redirects here, yet the principles of art are nowhere contained on this page. Should we copy the information from Principles of Art to this article? Jjnishiyama (talk) 17:23, 2 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]