Talk:Virgin boy egg: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 01:02, 24 October 2015

China Start‑class Low‑importance

	China portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject China, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of China related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChinaWikipedia:WikiProject ChinaTemplate:WikiProject ChinaChina-related articles
Start	This article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Food and drink Start‑class Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Food and drink, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of food and drink related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Food and drinkWikipedia:WikiProject Food and drinkTemplate:WikiProject Food and drinkFood and drink articles

Start

This article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Food and Drink task list:

To edit this page, select here

Here are some tasks you can do for WikiProject Food and drink:

Help bring these Top Importance articles currently B Status or below up to GA status: Agaricus bisporus (i.e. mushroom), Beef, Bread, Curry, Drink, Food, Ham and eggs, Soy sauce, Sushi, Yogurt
Bring these Top Importance articles currently at GA status up to FA status: Beer, French cuisine, Sugar
Bring these High Importance articles currently at GA status up to FA status: Apple, Burger King, Fish
Participate in project-related deletion discussions.
Delete unrelated trivia sections found in articles. Please review WP:Trivia and WP:Handling trivia to learn how to do this.
Add the {{WikiProject Food and drink}} project banner to food and drink related articles and content to help bring them to the attention of members. For a complete list of banners for WikiProject Food and drink and its child projects, select here.
Provide photographs and images for Category:Wikipedia requested images of food
Consider joining this project's Assessment task force. List any project ideas in this section

Note: These lists are transcluded from the project's tasks pages.

It is requested that a photograph be included in this article to improve its quality.
The external tool WordPress Openverse may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites.

Upload

Ministry of Tofu

It translates articles from China [1] so it should be a valid source. CallawayRox (talk) 18:34, 3 April 2012 (UTC) Possibly our friends on the Chinese pages are putting us on? MollyNYC (talk) 12:06, 6 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

It is just a local dish which is eaten by perverts in one district in China who love urine. [2] --Däädaa (talk) 22:20, 3 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Either way, we should try to use more reliable sources if they are available, as is the case here.--Yaksar (let's chat) 23:41, 3 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I am removing the segment about urine being sterile, as it doesn't have a source but i have a source for urine not being sterile http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2012/04/120409164156.htm — Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.54.93.168 (talk) 18:31, 20 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Needs some seriously better citations.

The blogosphere most definately does not count as a citation. Nothing a blogger says should ever be considered as true. Those people are just 'dudes' who talk smack on the internet. This article sounds a heck of a lot like a school project on 'how long does it take for someone to notice a bogus article on wikipedia' please make some REAL citations that do not include a blogger. I've read some pretty ridiculous blogs on reuters, and forbes that were obviously a blogger and not an actual journalist. Despite the famous name behind them, the vast majority of these bloggers have no adult supervision, and can write whatever bull-'feces' they want, with no professional proofreaders to fact check anything they say. Tothmetres (talk) 00:20, 24 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You cited yourself.

Citation number [5] actually cites your own website. Most definately not allowed. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tothmetres (talk • contribs) 00:31, 24 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

deleted.

<< deleted because it was obviously bogus, the guy cited blogs and his own website as a source. If a Wikipedia moderator could please explain how to do this correctly, I would be more than happy to comply with proper wikipedia etiquette, but this was just stupid. Has this bogus article seriously been around since 2012?>> Tothmetres (talk) 00:39, 24 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

lack of reliable sources

I think this is what I meant to say when I spuriously just deleted it.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Identifying_reliable_sources