Talk:Chinese expedition to Tibet (1910): Difference between revisions
m Cartakes moved page Talk:Chinese invasion of Tibet (1910) to Talk:Chinese expedition to Tibet (1910) over redirect: Not entirely true, British expedition to Tibet was created long time ago |
→Recent move without discussion: new section |
||
Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
[[User:Rajmaan|Rajmaan]] ([[User talk:Rajmaan|talk]]) 05:26, 26 July 2014 (UTC) |
[[User:Rajmaan|Rajmaan]] ([[User talk:Rajmaan|talk]]) 05:26, 26 July 2014 (UTC) |
||
== Recent move without discussion == |
|||
The page has been moved twice ([https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Chinese_expedition_to_Tibet_(1910)&diff=674254199&oldid=653522509 1] and [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Chinese_expedition_to_Tibet_(1910)&diff=675408322&oldid=675340151 2]) from [[Chinese invasion of Tibet (1910)]] to [[Chinese expedition to Tibet (1910)]] without discussion. The original title seems more appropriate as the term [[Military expedition]] usually implies "''the deployment of a state's military to fight '''abroad'''''", while a [[military invasion]] can concern a country own territory ("''An invasion is a military offensive in which large parts of combatants of one geopolitical entity aggressively enter territory controlled by another such entity, generally with the objective of either conquering, liberating or '''re-establishing control''' or authority over a territory''"). In the context of the sensitive Tibet-China issue, using the term "''invasion''" is far more neutral than "''expedition''", as it does not imply that China is a foreign force.--[[User:6-A04-W96-K38-S41-V38|6-A04-W96-K38-S41-V38]] ([[User talk:6-A04-W96-K38-S41-V38|talk]]) 12:15, 29 October 2015 (UTC) |
Revision as of 12:15, 29 October 2015
Tibet Stub‑class Low‑importance | ||||||||||
|
China Stub‑class Low‑importance | ||||||||||
|
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Chinese expedition to Tibet (1910) article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Zhao Erfeng, 1905_Tibetan_Rebellion#Retaliatory_expeditions
http://mcx.sagepub.com/content/34/2/210.short
The Men Who Would Not Be Amban and the One Who Would: Four Frontline Officials and Qing Tibet Policy, 1905-1911 Dahpon David Ho Modern China Vol. 34, No. 2 (Apr., 2008), pp. 210-246 Published by: Sage Publications, Inc. Article Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/20062699
Rajmaan (talk) 05:26, 26 July 2014 (UTC)
Recent move without discussion
The page has been moved twice (1 and 2) from Chinese invasion of Tibet (1910) to Chinese expedition to Tibet (1910) without discussion. The original title seems more appropriate as the term Military expedition usually implies "the deployment of a state's military to fight abroad", while a military invasion can concern a country own territory ("An invasion is a military offensive in which large parts of combatants of one geopolitical entity aggressively enter territory controlled by another such entity, generally with the objective of either conquering, liberating or re-establishing control or authority over a territory"). In the context of the sensitive Tibet-China issue, using the term "invasion" is far more neutral than "expedition", as it does not imply that China is a foreign force.--6-A04-W96-K38-S41-V38 (talk) 12:15, 29 October 2015 (UTC)