Jump to content

Talk:Free software movement: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 27: Line 27:
* where should [[free and open-source software movement]] redirect to? Should it have its own, new article?
* where should [[free and open-source software movement]] redirect to? Should it have its own, new article?
I wonder how much content of the current [[free software movement]] and [[open-source software]] needs splitting/rewriting because of this. --<sub style="border:1px solid #228B22;padding:1px;">[[User:Piotrus|Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus]]&#124;[[User talk:Piotrus|<font style="color:#7CFC00;background:#006400;"> reply here</font>]]</sub> 06:23, 3 November 2015 (UTC)
I wonder how much content of the current [[free software movement]] and [[open-source software]] needs splitting/rewriting because of this. --<sub style="border:1px solid #228B22;padding:1px;">[[User:Piotrus|Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus]]&#124;[[User talk:Piotrus|<font style="color:#7CFC00;background:#006400;"> reply here</font>]]</sub> 06:23, 3 November 2015 (UTC)

== Dead Link Free Software in Public Agencies ==

I think I found the rename, but don't know enough about Peru to know for sure: https://en.wikisource.org/wiki/Use_of_free_software_in_public_agencies

[[Special:Contributions/2601:647:201:3200:848C:7682:5E31:EA30|2601:647:201:3200:848C:7682:5E31:EA30]] ([[User talk:2601:647:201:3200:848C:7682:5E31:EA30|talk]]) 21:31, 31 December 2015 (UTC)

Revision as of 21:31, 31 December 2015

The open source community

The lead should have a small paragraph about the relation between the Free Software community and the Open Source community. This would be supported by the now named Subgroups and schisms section. Belorn (talk) 16:47, 22 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I fixed your proposal.93.129.248.127 (talk) 10:04, 29 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Style

Specifically regarding where quotations are more prolific, there seems to be some mixing of 'free software movement' and 'free-software movement' used. Which is proper? Raider480 (talk) 01:50, 28 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I've created this category, please help to populate. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 06:08, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Free and open-source software movement

I have added alt name free and open-source software movement' to the lead, but I am having second thoughts. I wonder if free and open-source software movement is a distinct topic in need of stubbing or should it be discussed here. I am familiar with the free software vs open software debate, but I think related literature on the movement often talks about one free and open-source software movement, of which both the free software movement and open-source software movement are parts. GBooks for "Free software movement" gives about 5k hits ([1]), "open-source software" just a little less, about 4k ("https://www.google.com/search?tbm=bks&q=%22Free+software+movement%22#tbm=bks&q=%22open-source+software+movement%22"), and "free and open-source software movement", about 1k ([2]). Open-source software movement redirected to Open-source software, but movement =/= software, just like free software =/= free software movement, through that article does discuss open software movement a bit in its history (Open-source_software#End_of_1990s:_Foundation_of_the_Open_Source_Initiative). So I have the following questions to the community:

I wonder how much content of the current free software movement and open-source software needs splitting/rewriting because of this. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 06:23, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I think I found the rename, but don't know enough about Peru to know for sure: https://en.wikisource.org/wiki/Use_of_free_software_in_public_agencies

2601:647:201:3200:848C:7682:5E31:EA30 (talk) 21:31, 31 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]