Jump to content

Talk:Blackbeard: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
ClueBot III (talk | contribs)
m Archiving 1 discussion to Talk:Blackbeard/Archive7. (BOT)
Pharkryi (talk | contribs)
Modern View: new section
Line 28: Line 28:
{{connected contributor|User1=Caprockranger|U1-declared=yes|U1-otherlinks= COI declared [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3ACaprockranger&type=revision&diff=664546607&oldid=664518500 here]. Caprockranger runs an underwater videography company, Nautilus, and has added content and/or sourcing that references his company to this and other articles. }}
{{connected contributor|User1=Caprockranger|U1-declared=yes|U1-otherlinks= COI declared [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3ACaprockranger&type=revision&diff=664546607&oldid=664518500 here]. Caprockranger runs an underwater videography company, Nautilus, and has added content and/or sourcing that references his company to this and other articles. }}
{{COI edit notice}}
{{COI edit notice}}

== Modern View ==

The entire modern view section sounds a little too casual for a Wikipedia article- just at a glance, I thought I was reading some enthusiasts report rather than an encyclopedia entry. I don't know, is that style of writing normal?[[User:Pharkryi|Pharkryi]] ([[User talk:Pharkryi|talk]]) 17:57, 26 January 2016 (UTC)

Revision as of 17:57, 26 January 2016

Featured articleBlackbeard is a featured article; it (or a previous version of it) has been identified as one of the best articles produced by the Wikipedia community. Even so, if you can update or improve it, please do so.
Main Page trophyThis article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page as Today's featured article on November 22, 2011.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
April 22, 2010Featured article candidatePromoted

Modern View

The entire modern view section sounds a little too casual for a Wikipedia article- just at a glance, I thought I was reading some enthusiasts report rather than an encyclopedia entry. I don't know, is that style of writing normal?Pharkryi (talk) 17:57, 26 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]