Talk:Roentgenium: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 08:46, 17 August 2006

This article is part of Wikipedia:WikiProject Elements. Elementbox converted 10:56, 15 July 2005 by Femto (previous revision was that of 12:59, 24 June 2005).

Redirect: Roentgenium

Number "111" and symbol "Uuu" ? That's just too fun, hope it stays this way ;-) --FvdP

It didnt... :( --67.81.20.56 23:38, 4 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Its symbol was Uuu because it was number 111. Each "un" in Unununium represents a 1, and since there are three "un"s, the name really means "element 111". The symbol, based off the name, was then Uuu. ;) User:Timrem/Sig 22:54, 2 April 2006 (UTC)

What year...

...do you think this element will get an official name?? My estimate is 2010. 66.32.142.216 00:01, 20 May 2004 (UTC)[reply]

True or false??

True or false: When the Roentgenium name becomes official sometime in the near future, the chemical symbol will be Ro. 66.245.2.190 16:46, 6 Aug 2004 (UTC)

False. The proposed symbol is Rg. Eric119 20:04, Aug 11, 2004 (UTC)

The name Roentgenium is now official: http://www.iupac.org/news/archives/2004/naming111.html andy 11:37, 9 Nov 2004 (UTC)

Updating articles in that respect -- Chris 73 Talk 13:10, Nov 9, 2004 (UTC)

Hmmmm. The pic in the table still needs updating. Eric119 06:14, 10 Nov 2004 (UTC)

Added a request for a new image to User talk:Maveric149, who made the image in the first place. -- Chris 73 Talk 10:07, Nov 10, 2004 (UTC)

I edited the image myself. Behold the power of GIMP. :-) --timc | Talk 17:11, 25 Nov 2004 (UTC)

Isotopes and half-livss?

So, is there one isotope, or three? Is the half-life 15 milliseconds, or 3.5 seconds, or 17 microseconds, or what? And if only three atoms of it were creqated, can we really talk about a half-life properly? DS 13:38, 27 Mar 2005 (UTC)

Again isotopes

According to the article, there are three isotopes known, but the article earlier says that all atoms synthesized were Rg-272. What is the correct information? Eric119 06:29, 19 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Color

Like how can it be confirmed to be colored like gold? Webelements doesn't claim that, they claim it to be silvery or gray in appearence. Andros 1337 23:39, 29 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

My reading of the article is that it is a prediction that, should enough of it ever be brought together, it would look something like gold...no one's actually seen it, so no web site could claim any color as confirmed. 208.23.142.201 19:34, 14 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Um...

"It is unlikely that Roentgenium will be used to make coins." Is it really neccesary to point this out?

@@ Line 36: / Line 36: @@
 My reading of the article is that it is a prediction that, should enough of it ever be brought together, it would look something like gold...no one's actually seen it, so no web site could claim any color as confirmed.
 [[User:208.23.142.201|208.23.142.201]] 19:34, 14 April 2006 (UTC)
+== Um... ==
+"It is unlikely that Roentgenium will be used to make coins." Is it really neccesary to point this out?