User talk:Profile101

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Profile101 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Well, i'm first time editing this, because I wanted that i'm not as Khine1973 vandalizing pages, well I will be fine if I won't do disruptive editing again. Well I already read already that I'm going to ask questions if i'm not sure what is that meaning? So sorry because i'm first time doing this, I will ask if I don't know anything like how to be an administrator? Well i've already done reading guide to appealing blocks and hope this is a good request. Well because I won't like to use IP address to edit forever, causing to see their IP addresses all the time.

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

• the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
• the block is no longer necessary because you

1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. --jpgordon^{::==( o )} 14:18, 20 January 2016 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user is asking that their block be reviewed:

Profile101 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Well I don't want to be disruptive on by user page. Hope I won't write all those nonsenses on my profile page, actually I don't know when can I be an administrator?

Notes:

• In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
• Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.

Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=Well I don't want to be disruptive on by user page. Hope I won't write all those nonsenses on my profile page, actually I don't know when can I be an administrator? |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=Well I don't want to be disruptive on by user page. Hope I won't write all those nonsenses on my profile page, actually I don't know when can I be an administrator? |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=Well I don't want to be disruptive on by user page. Hope I won't write all those nonsenses on my profile page, actually I don't know when can I be an administrator? |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}

I will only send another archives every monthly, every time will shown monthly to prevent wastage.

15 January 2016 - Creation Day

Your user page

Hi there, I have removed a bit from your user page. Only administrators can block others from editing, you can't. Class455fan1 (talk) 18:19, 15 January 2016 (UTC)

16 January 2016

Reverted edit on Draft:Taipei Metro C371

Hello, I'm Oshwah. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Draft:Taipei Metro C371— because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 10:36, 16 January 2016 (UTC)

Hi, because we have redirected to Taipei Metro C371 and is now a real page, no longer a draft page. Thanks for your corporation!

Your edit on My User Page

To: Class455fan1
Hi, i have seen your edit on my User page you removed you right? But anyway this is to remember the person who edit that so I fan remember at all times. You are always the one you edit. If you revert One more time, I will Protect this page for sure.

It is ok to remove this message, please stop reverting you to remove you, unsigned comment by Profile101 on 16 January 2016 at 20:27.

Profile101, the way to talk to Class455fan1 is to post your request on his talkpage, not here on your own, unless you're directly replying to a post from him. Incidentally, I've asked him to please not remove his name again from your userpage, as I think your mention of him is harmless. Bishonen | talk 12:32, 16 January 2016 (UTC).

Bishonen he already has done 😉, and I've replied. Class455fan1 (talk) 12:34, 16 January 2016 (UTC)

See Also

User:Profile101
User talk:Profile101/Archives List - For Mobile Only

• (This should go on your userpage, if anywhere. Here, it just messes up the flow of the page. Bishonen | talk 16:58, 16 January 2016 (UTC).)

Please always log in

Hi, Profile101, welcome to Wikipedia. It looks like both 119.74.47.12 and 219.75.38.135 are your IPs. Please log in to edit. Editing sometimes from your account and sometimes from one of your IPs makes it difficult for other people (and for you too, I should think) to get an overview of your edits. It's particularly discouraged to edit the same article from both the account and an IP, as you did at Taipei Metro C321, giving the impression that the edits had been done by two (or three) different people. And please don't post accusations of disruptive editing to yourself or copypaste content from the IP archives to the account's, as that's even more confusing. In fact, your whole system is so confusing that I may have misunderstood it. Please respond and explain. Or, alternatively, simply always use the account from now on. Bishonen | talk 12:20, 16 January 2016 (UTC).

I see you editing from yet another IP,[1] ignoring my post above even though you have obviously looked at this page, and though I asked you specifically to respond. This is a warning: stop editing logged out, or your account and all your known IPs will be blocked from editing. Please respond here, and if possible show some sign that you understand what I say. Bishonen | talk 15:15, 16 January 2016 (UTC).

Your user page

Hello. I have removed some material from your user page, where you claimed to be someone you aren't, and where you also in effect claimed to be an administrator here, which you aren't. So do not add it back again. Thank you. Thomas.W ^talk 16:53, 16 January 2016 (UTC)

I have removed the date headers on this page

I have removed the empty date headers on this page, as they merely make the page harder to read. The last post on a page is supposed to be at the end, so that you will find it easily. I wonder if it's all the date headers that have prevented you from seeing my posts? Or perhaps you're choosing to ignore me, which wouldn't be a good idea — I simply can't tell. Anyway, now I am at the bottom of your page, so you have little excuse for continued unresponsiveness.

I was also going to remove the highly misleading table on your userpage, but I see Thomas.W has already selectively removed the bad bits. You can't block or unblock users or protect pages, and what did you mean by saying you're the "Main User from" User:Charlesdrakew? If you mean that's another account of yours, that seems highly unlikely (and if it was true, I'd block you as a sock). Can you please stop spouting so much nonsense, and reply to me? Either below here or on my page will do. Bishonen | talk 16:58, 16 January 2016 (UTC).

Charlesdrakew is not related to this user. I have made him aware that this user is trying to impersonate him. Class455fan1 (talk) 17:08, 16 January 2016 (UTC)

17 January 2016

Rules

On my rules, no Subsections were allowed to add on my user talk given below, section from every date. None of you must do a subsection here on my user, anyone do this, I will Blocked you from editing till further notice. So make sure no one must do a subsection on my user talk.

Unsigned comment by Profile101 on 17 January 2016 at 12:01.

My User Page and User talk page vandalism, to blocked someone

To: Davey2010
Hi, can you be my Main User of this user? They always one to vandalize my page all the time, My user talk page was also vandalizing my page, can you check my page, and blocked three of them i the next time they want to vandalize.

And also can you help me in the contributions timeline? Thanks for helping me!

Unsigned comment by Profile101 on 17 January 2016 at 12:08 —Preceding undated comment added 04:07, 17 January 2016 (UTC)

Blocked

Hi again, Profile101, are you listening? You have been blocked. I'm not sure if you're really one individual, or if a bunch of kids are using this account and the various IPs associated with it, and contradicting each other. Or if possibly the problem is an inability to understand instructions in English. I'm afraid you have to be able to do that if you're going to edit the English Wikipedia. Just as one example, you have been told several times that you can't block people, as only administrators can do that. And yet you continue to threaten to block people. And you have restored the disruptive headers on this page, with no response (other than silly threats) to my explanation of why they shouldn't be here. Etc etc etc. Despite my increasingly urgent requests that you stop spouting nonsense and reply to me, you continue with the nonsense, and you do not respond. Also, you have created a number of articles that are apparently machine translations, and that create a lot of work for other editors. This account and the IPs known to be associated with it — 119.74.47.12, 116.14.223.181 and 219.75.38.135 — have been blocked because they're a net negative to the encyclopedia. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Bishonen | talk 21:58, 17 January 2016 (UTC).

20 January 2016

Apologies

Well, i'm sorry Bishonen, I already accepted my lesson not to do all the things which i did on User:Profile101, if i not do all these disruotive editing again. Well i have accepted subsections if I needed to, well i will not write all these again about being an adminstrators. Can you tell me examples of Adminstrators? You, Davey2010, Materialscientist.... Can you give me examples of an adminstrators. When can I be the adminstrator for Profile101? Can you please read my message. I won't do it again, can you instead blocked for one week instead. If not i have to edit on IP address again which was wasted. I'm so sorry. Subsections i will do it IF I needed it to. Can you help me to ask???

Unsgined comment by Profile101 on 20 January 2016 at 21:38.

You already should be in control of your own account. Instead of writing this, you can do either of the following

• Submit another unblock request, using the advice the admin who declined it gave you

Or

• Take a look at WP:STANDARDOFFER. If you go six months without socking, and promising not to repeat your disruptive editing which got you in this situation in the first place, you may be unblocked.

Well, I don't understand what you had just said, there are too many words to read and cannot understand properly, well i think i'm nit sure about these. Maybe i have to just wait until is unblocked.

Class455fan1 (talk) 18:29, 22 January 2016 (UTC)

29 January 2015

Submited Another Block Request

Well, Class455fan1, i've already done sending another unblocked request in good reasons. Hope I will be accepted in good requests. I won't get bad reasons anyway. Hope I will get to redirect for the 2nd Archive for January. Maybe Date Headers right, maybe i just put "No Messages Listed Here", even is silly, but is isn't silly at all to me. Subsections i will do that WHEN IS THE SAME WORDS, THEN I WILL PUT THE USER. And usually I will follow Singapore Time (UTC +08:00).

Unsigned comment by Profile101 on 29 January 2016 at 22:55.

Moving Next Archives

Also, the submited request, once is unblocked, I will move these two unblocked requests in Future Archive 2: January 2016 updates. For each year I will need 12 archives per year means 1 archive = 1 month. Hope every archives will be protected except Archive 1 will not be protected from editing.

And also, plus there will be no more silly threats after all. Can you tell me they were not disruptive to me. And usually each message is always 1 second ahead.

Unsgined comment by Profile101 on 29 January 2016 at 22:58

See Also

User:Profile101
User talk:Profile101/Archives List