User talk:Profile101

Archives

Archive 1: IP Address
Archive 2: January 2016

I will only send another archives every monthly, every time will shown monthly to prevent wastage.

Not done It is not possible for me to provide admin help when I cannot understand what you're asking – which appears to be a very large problem with your edits. The issue of archiving does not appear related to your block, though you do seem to talking about it in relation to it. The English Wikipedia is a site where some command of English really is necessary to edit properly, and unfortunately, the simple fact is that you are not able to do so. Since it seems you are from Singapore, consider editing a different Wikipedia in your native tongue.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 16:29, 30 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

15 January 2016 - Creation Day

Your user page

Hi there, I have removed a bit from your user page. Only administrators can block others from editing, you can't. Class455fan1 (talk) 18:19, 15 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

16 January 2016

Reverted edit on Draft:Taipei Metro C371

Hello, I'm Oshwah. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Draft:Taipei Metro C371— because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 10:36, 16 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, because we have redirected to Taipei Metro C371 and is now a real page, no longer a draft page. Thanks for your corporation!

Your edit on My User Page

To: Class455fan1
Hi, i have seen your edit on my User page you removed you right? But anyway this is to remember the person who edit that so I fan remember at all times. You are always the one you edit. If you revert One more time, I will Protect this page for sure.

It is ok to remove this message, please stop reverting you to remove you, unsigned comment by Profile101 on 16 January 2016 at 20:27.

Profile101, the way to talk to Class455fan1 is to post your request on his talkpage, not here on your own, unless you're directly replying to a post from him. Incidentally, I've asked him to please not remove his name again from your userpage, as I think your mention of him is harmless. Bishonen | talk 12:32, 16 January 2016 (UTC).[reply]

Bishonen he already has done 😉, and I've replied. Class455fan1 (talk) 12:34, 16 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please always log in

Hi, Profile101, welcome to Wikipedia. It looks like both 119.74.47.12 and 219.75.38.135 are your IPs. Please log in to edit. Editing sometimes from your account and sometimes from one of your IPs makes it difficult for other people (and for you too, I should think) to get an overview of your edits. It's particularly discouraged to edit the same article from both the account and an IP, as you did at Taipei Metro C321, giving the impression that the edits had been done by two (or three) different people. And please don't post accusations of disruptive editing to yourself or copypaste content from the IP archives to the account's, as that's even more confusing. In fact, your whole system is so confusing that I may have misunderstood it. Please respond and explain. Or, alternatively, simply always use the account from now on. Bishonen | talk 12:20, 16 January 2016 (UTC).[reply]

I see you editing from yet another IP,[1] ignoring my post above even though you have obviously looked at this page, and though I asked you specifically to respond. This is a warning: stop editing logged out, or your account and all your known IPs will be blocked from editing. Please respond here, and if possible show some sign that you understand what I say. Bishonen | talk 15:15, 16 January 2016 (UTC).[reply]

Your user page

Hello. I have removed some material from your user page, where you claimed to be someone you aren't, and where you also in effect claimed to be an administrator here, which you aren't. So do not add it back again. Thank you. Thomas.W ^talk 16:53, 16 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I have removed the date headers on this page

I have removed the empty date headers on this page, as they merely make the page harder to read. The last post on a page is supposed to be at the end, so that you will find it easily. I wonder if it's all the date headers that have prevented you from seeing my posts? Or perhaps you're choosing to ignore me, which wouldn't be a good idea — I simply can't tell. Anyway, now I am at the bottom of your page, so you have little excuse for continued unresponsiveness.

I was also going to remove the highly misleading table on your userpage, but I see Thomas.W has already selectively removed the bad bits. You can't block or unblock users or protect pages, and what did you mean by saying you're the "Main User from" User:Charlesdrakew? If you mean that's another account of yours, that seems highly unlikely (and if it was true, I'd block you as a sock). Can you please stop spouting so much nonsense, and reply to me? Either below here or on my page will do. Bishonen | talk 16:58, 16 January 2016 (UTC).[reply]

Charlesdrakew is not related to this user. I have made him aware that this user is trying to impersonate him. Class455fan1 (talk) 17:08, 16 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

17 January 2016

Rules

On my rules, no Subsections were allowed to add on my user talk given below, section from every date. None of you must do a subsection here on my user, anyone do this, I will Blocked you from editing till further notice. So make sure no one must do a subsection on my user talk.

Unsigned comment by Profile101 on 17 January 2016 at 12:01.

My User Page and User talk page vandalism, to blocked someone

To: Davey2010
Hi, can you be my Main User of this user? They always one to vandalize my page all the time, My user talk page was also vandalizing my page, can you check my page, and blocked three of them i the next time they want to vandalize.

And also can you help me in the contributions timeline? Thanks for helping me!

Unsigned comment by Profile101 on 17 January 2016 at 12:08 —Preceding undated comment added 04:07, 17 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

Hi again, Profile101, are you listening? You have been blocked. I'm not sure if you're really one individual, or if a bunch of kids are using this account and the various IPs associated with it, and contradicting each other. Or if possibly the problem is an inability to understand instructions in English. I'm afraid you have to be able to do that if you're going to edit the English Wikipedia. Just as one example, you have been told several times that you can't block people, as only administrators can do that. And yet you continue to threaten to block people. And you have restored the disruptive headers on this page, with no response (other than silly threats) to my explanation of why they shouldn't be here. Etc etc etc. Despite my increasingly urgent requests that you stop spouting nonsense and reply to me, you continue with the nonsense, and you do not respond. Also, you have created a number of articles that are apparently machine translations, and that create a lot of work for other editors. This account and the IPs known to be associated with it — 119.74.47.12, 116.14.223.181 and 219.75.38.135 — have been blocked because they're a net negative to the encyclopedia. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Bishonen | talk 21:58, 17 January 2016 (UTC).[reply]

20 January 2016 - User Blocked

Apologies

Well, i'm sorry Bishonen, I already accepted my lesson not to do all the things which i did on User:Profile101, if i not do all these disruotive editing again. Well i have accepted subsections if I needed to, well i will not write all these again about being an adminstrators. Can you tell me examples of Adminstrators? You, Davey2010, Materialscientist.... Can you give me examples of an adminstrators. When can I be the adminstrator for Profile101? Can you please read my message. I won't do it again, can you instead blocked for one week instead. If not i have to edit on IP address again which was wasted. I'm so sorry. Subsections i will do it IF I needed it to. Can you help me to ask???

Unsgined comment by Profile101 on 20 January 2016 at 21:38.

You already should be in control of your own account. Instead of writing this, you can do either of the following

Submit another unblock request, using the advice the admin who declined it gave you

Or

Take a look at WP:STANDARDOFFER. If you go six months without socking, and promising not to repeat your disruptive editing which got you in this situation in the first place, you may be unblocked.

Class455fan1 (talk) 18:29, 22 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Well, I don't understand what you had just said, there are too many words to read and cannot understand properly, well i think i'm nit sure about these. Maybe i have to just wait until is unblocked. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Profile101 (talk • contribs) 14:54, 29 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You don't understand then you might as well don't come back la, get blocked indefinitely. Xavierang2002 (talk) 15:07, 22 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

29 January 2016 - User Blocked

Submited Another Block Request

Well, Class455fan1, i've already done sending another unblocked request in good reasons. Hope I will be accepted in good requests. I won't get bad reasons anyway. Hope I will get to redirect for the 2nd Archive for January. Maybe Date Headers right, maybe i just put "No Messages Listed Here", even is silly, but is isn't silly at all to me. Subsections i will do that WHEN IS THE SAME WORDS, THEN I WILL PUT THE USER. And usually I will follow Singapore Time (UTC +08:00).

Unsigned comment by Profile101 on 29 January 2016 at 22:55.

Moving Next Archives

Also, the submited request, once is unblocked, I will move these two unblocked requests in Future Archive 2: January 2016 updates. For each year I will need 12 archives per year means 1 archive = 1 month. Hope every archives will be protected except Archive 1 will not be protected from editing.

And also, plus there will be no more silly threats after all. Can you tell me they were not disruptive to me. And usually each message is always 1 second ahead.

Unsgined comment by Profile101 on 29 January 2016 at 22:58

Yearly Mistake and Always check my messages

Well sorry administrators, i already been changed to 2016 from 2015, sorry about that. And also those who know me and edit my page about me right, please always always always read my future messages which I have received. And comment and reply to me if you already reply to me. If you think reply is no good, i will make some more messages to all of you until when i'm happy about that replies and messages.

Unsigned comment by Profile101 on 29 January 2016 at 23:09

Added Events and Always removed unblocked requests to Archive 2

Well between 20 and 29 January 2016 today were the blocked days which I am blocked, hope everyone can reply to me very soon. Also, please send all the unblock requests to the future Archive 2. Thank you very much for your corporation!

Oops, I miss out the another = to know that is X.X. Sorry about that

Unsigned comment by Profile101 on 29 January 2016 at 23:15.

Users, please transfer all the January updates to future Archive 2

Well everyone, one warning, please transfer ALL messages from January 2016 and send it to Archive 2. And please check for spelling and grammar at Archive 2 and make sure is semi-protected at Archive 2 onwards. Nobody must do on Archive 1. Please reply to me.

Unsigned comment by Profile101 on 29 January 2016 at 23:19.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Profile101 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Well, i'm first time editing this, because I wanted that i'm not as Khine1973 vandalizing pages, well I will be fine if I won't do disruptive editing again. Well I already read already that I'm going to ask questions if i'm not sure what is that meaning? So sorry because i'm first time doing this, I will ask if I don't know anything like how to be an administrator? Well i've already done reading guide to appealing blocks and hope this is a good request. Well because I won't like to use IP address to edit forever, causing to see their IP addresses all the time.

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

−

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or

−

the block is no longer necessary because you

−

understand what you have been blocked for,

−

will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and

−

will make useful contributions instead.

− Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. --jpgordon^{::==( o )} 14:18, 20 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

−

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Profile101 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I have communicated with Bishonen about the problem. He has explained me in great detail that my article was in violation of two of the Wikipedia rules which I realized I should have thoroughly read. Now that the administrator has explained me my mistakes, I would keep this in mind, and would love to positively contribute to the Wikipedia community, keeping in mind the rules and regulations. I request you to please accept my appeal to revoke this block. Profile101 (Talk) 19:17, 4 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Per conversation below...you cant just copy and paste someone else's unblock request. I'm declining this and removing talk page access. only (talk) 11:14, 5 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

The quality of your English keeps changing. How many people use this account? Anna Frodesiak (talk) 10:37, 5 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

It's a straight copy/paste from User talk:Darklord.ankit. —Wasell^(T) 10:39, 5 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

February 2016

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. Your ability to edit your talk page has also been revoked. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System. only (talk) 11:15, 5 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Possible Sockpuppet?

I think that User:Eeditflyover could be a possible sock of this user. The account has the exact same editing style as this user's IP and when he edited Charlesdrakew's talk page, he had the same words which he puts when signing comments. I would open an SPI if i had more spare time, but I am incredibly busy with exam revision. Class455fan1 (talk) 12:07, 7 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I think i'm not, i just warned him that he still thinks that he can block people but just that he needed to request for the administrator first, well i wanted him to request for Admin-help. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 42.60.184.23 (talk) 12:10, 7 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Geolocating your IP also tells me that you are also a possible sock puppet. I think i may need to open an SPI now. Also, you didn't warn him, it was Charlesdrakew Class455fan1 (talk) 12:12, 7 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semiprotected

I have semiprotected this talkpage indefinitely due to the user's persistent socking. Profile101, I warned you about threatening people, and you did it again. I'd be surprised if anybody would unblock you now. Bishonen | talk 13:42, 13 February 2016 (UTC).[reply]

Block evasion

For the record, block evasion by IP 115.66.229.67, with such nice comments as "If you revert that edit again, I will throw you in Fuck Language". Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 13:10, 19 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

About being unblocked Please do not wait six months. You have almost no chance of ever being unblocked. You have socked, lied, threatened. The community does not trust you. You are wasting your time. Please just give up. This is good advice. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 08:13, 28 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppet investigation

Hi. An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Diamese, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.

Nordic Dragon 06:50, 8 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

User talk:Profile101

15 January 2016 - Creation Day

Your user page

16 January 2016

Reverted edit on Draft:Taipei Metro C371

Your edit on My User Page

See Also

Please always log in

Your user page

I have removed the date headers on this page

17 January 2016

Rules

My User Page and User talk page vandalism, to blocked someone

Blocked

20 January 2016 - User Blocked

Apologies

29 January 2016 - User Blocked

Submited Another Block Request

Moving Next Archives

Yearly Mistake and Always check my messages

Added Events and Always removed unblocked requests to Archive 2

Users, please transfer all the January updates to future Archive 2

See Also

February 2016

Possible Sockpuppet?

Semiprotected

Block evasion

Sockpuppet investigation