Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/MysticGotJokes: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 00:29, 8 February 2016

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article lacks third-party reliable sources of any kind and has no claim to notability; fails both WP:GNG and WP:BIO. Aoidh (talk) 10:45, 31 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. — Rhododendrites ^talk \\ 16:19, 31 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - I was going to nominate for the same reasons today if the creator still had not added sources. There are lots of ghits, as is typical for a YouTuber, but I'm not seeing significant coverage. — Rhododendrites ^talk \\ 16:21, 31 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete for now as nothing is better convincing for WP:CREATIVE. SwisterTwister talk 03:40, 3 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Artist is referenced in article which mentions in detail information about him, which definitely suggests he is notable.-Robert Hill-Forntongoover

@@ Line 11: / Line 11: @@
 :<small class="delsort-notice">Note:  This debate has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Arizona|list of Arizona-related deletion discussions]]. [[User:Clpo13|clpo13]]<sub>([[User_talk:Clpo13|talk]])</sub> 23:22, 31 January 2016 (UTC)</small>
 *'''Delete''' for now as nothing is better convincing for WP:CREATIVE. [[User:SwisterTwister|<font color="green">SwisterTwister</font>]] [[User talk:SwisterTwister|<font color="green">talk</font>]] 03:40, 3 February 2016 (UTC)
-*'''Keep''' Artist is referenced in article which mentions in detail information about him, which definitely suggests he is notable.-~~
+*'''Keep''' Artist is referenced in article which mentions in detail information about him, which definitely suggests he is notable.-'''Robert''' Hill-Forntongoover