Jump to content

USS Miami (SSN-755): Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Ktr101 (talk | contribs)
m →‎External links: clean up, replaced: in Connecticut → in Groton, Connecticut using AWB
Rescuing 2 sources, flagging 0 as dead, and archiving 1 sources. #IABot
Line 91: Line 91:
Originally the U.S. Navy reported that the fire started when an industrial vacuum cleaner, used "to clean worksites on the sub after shipyard workers’ shifts," sucked up a heat source that ignited debris inside the vacuum. On 23 July 2012 Casey J. Fury, a civilian painter and sandblaster working on the sub, was indicted on two counts of arson after confessing to starting the fire. Fury admitted to setting the 23 May fire by igniting some rags on the top bunk of a bunk room. He claimed to have started the fire to get out of work early.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.boston.com/news/local/new_hampshire/articles/2012/06/29/navy_no_update_on_uss_miami_investigation/|title=Navy: No update on USS Miami investigation|work=boston.com |agency=Associated Press|accessdate=5 July 2015}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.seacoastonline.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20120723/NEWS/120729932/-1/NEWSMAP |title=Suspect in $400M sub blaze appears in court |last=McMahon |first=Charles |date=23 July 2012 |work=seacoastonline.com |accessdate=5 July 2015}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.wcvb.com/news/local/boston-north/Man-charged-in-fire-on-USS-Miami/-/11984708/15641884/-/eeu7f9z/-/index.html|title=Man charged in fire on USS Miami|work=www.wcvb.com |accessdate=5 July 2015}}</ref><ref>{{cite news| title=Civilian worker charged with setting both fires aboard, near submarine in Maine shipyard|last=Canfield |first=Clarke |url=http://www.newser.com/article/da06ofmg3/civilian-worker-charged-with-setting-both-fires-aboard-near-submarine-in-maine-shipyard.html | agency=[[Associated Press]] |year=2012 | archiveurl=http://web.archive.org/web/20120723172145/http://www.newser.com/article/da06ofmg3/civilian-worker-charged-with-setting-both-fires-aboard-near-submarine-in-maine-shipyard.html| archivedate=23 July 2012 |accessdate=5 July 2015}}</ref> On 15 March 2013 Fury was sentenced to over 17 years in federal prison and ordered to pay $400 million in restitution.<ref>{{cite news |url=http://www.cnn.com/2013/03/15/justice/maine-submarine-arson-sentence/index.html?iref=obnetwork |title=Shipyard worker sentenced to 17 years for $400 million submarine fire |last=Boyette |first=Chris |work=CNN |date=16 March 2013 |accessdate=5 July 2015}}</ref>
Originally the U.S. Navy reported that the fire started when an industrial vacuum cleaner, used "to clean worksites on the sub after shipyard workers’ shifts," sucked up a heat source that ignited debris inside the vacuum. On 23 July 2012 Casey J. Fury, a civilian painter and sandblaster working on the sub, was indicted on two counts of arson after confessing to starting the fire. Fury admitted to setting the 23 May fire by igniting some rags on the top bunk of a bunk room. He claimed to have started the fire to get out of work early.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.boston.com/news/local/new_hampshire/articles/2012/06/29/navy_no_update_on_uss_miami_investigation/|title=Navy: No update on USS Miami investigation|work=boston.com |agency=Associated Press|accessdate=5 July 2015}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.seacoastonline.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20120723/NEWS/120729932/-1/NEWSMAP |title=Suspect in $400M sub blaze appears in court |last=McMahon |first=Charles |date=23 July 2012 |work=seacoastonline.com |accessdate=5 July 2015}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.wcvb.com/news/local/boston-north/Man-charged-in-fire-on-USS-Miami/-/11984708/15641884/-/eeu7f9z/-/index.html|title=Man charged in fire on USS Miami|work=www.wcvb.com |accessdate=5 July 2015}}</ref><ref>{{cite news| title=Civilian worker charged with setting both fires aboard, near submarine in Maine shipyard|last=Canfield |first=Clarke |url=http://www.newser.com/article/da06ofmg3/civilian-worker-charged-with-setting-both-fires-aboard-near-submarine-in-maine-shipyard.html | agency=[[Associated Press]] |year=2012 | archiveurl=http://web.archive.org/web/20120723172145/http://www.newser.com/article/da06ofmg3/civilian-worker-charged-with-setting-both-fires-aboard-near-submarine-in-maine-shipyard.html| archivedate=23 July 2012 |accessdate=5 July 2015}}</ref> On 15 March 2013 Fury was sentenced to over 17 years in federal prison and ordered to pay $400 million in restitution.<ref>{{cite news |url=http://www.cnn.com/2013/03/15/justice/maine-submarine-arson-sentence/index.html?iref=obnetwork |title=Shipyard worker sentenced to 17 years for $400 million submarine fire |last=Boyette |first=Chris |work=CNN |date=16 March 2013 |accessdate=5 July 2015}}</ref>


The U.S. Navy debated on whether to scrap the boat. Both of Maine's Senators, [[Susan Collins]] and [[Olympia Snowe]], advocated repairing her.<ref>{{cite news|url=http://www.pressherald.com/news/navy-fire-on-nuclear-sub-started-in-vacuum_2012-06-07.html |title=Navy: Fire on nuclear sub started in vacuum cleaner |work=Portland Press Herald |last=Hoey |first=Dennis |date=7 June 2012 |accessdate=5 July 2015}}</ref> The U.S. Navy asked Congress to add $220 million to the operations and maintenance budget for emergent and unfunded ship repairs which would be used to help repair ''Miami''.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.theday.com/article/20120720/NWS09/307209962/-1/NWS|title=Links to USS Miami fire explored |work=theday.com |date=20 July 2012 |last=McDermott |first=Jennifer |accessdate=5 July 2015}}</ref> The final outcome was a choice to repair the submarine at an estimated total cost of $450 million. The boat was expected to return to service sometime in 2015.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.courant.com/business/hc-us-submarine-20120822,0,234505.story|title=USS Miami Expected Back In Service In 2015 |work=Hartford Courant |accessdate=2012-08-22}} {{dead link|date=July 2015}}</ref> However, congressional inaction to fully resolve the [[United States fiscal cliff]] had put this in doubt.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.navytimes.com/news/2013/03/ap-navy-says-submarine-miami-repairs-uncertain-031813/ |title=Navy: Repairs to submarine Miami now uncertain |work=NavyTimes |last=Sharp |first=David |date=18 March 2013 |accessdate=5 July 2015}}</ref>
The U.S. Navy debated on whether to scrap the boat. Both of Maine's Senators, [[Susan Collins]] and [[Olympia Snowe]], advocated repairing her.<ref>{{cite news|url=http://www.pressherald.com/news/navy-fire-on-nuclear-sub-started-in-vacuum_2012-06-07.html |title=Navy: Fire on nuclear sub started in vacuum cleaner |work=Portland Press Herald |last=Hoey |first=Dennis |date=7 June 2012 |accessdate=5 July 2015}}</ref> The U.S. Navy asked Congress to add $220 million to the operations and maintenance budget for emergent and unfunded ship repairs which would be used to help repair ''Miami''.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.theday.com/article/20120720/NWS09/307209962/-1/NWS|title=Links to USS Miami fire explored |work=theday.com |date=20 July 2012 |last=McDermott |first=Jennifer |accessdate=5 July 2015}}</ref> The final outcome was a choice to repair the submarine at an estimated total cost of $450 million. The boat was expected to return to service sometime in 2015.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.courant.com/business/hc-us-submarine-20120822,0,234505.story |title=USS Miami Expected Back In Service In 2015 |work=Hartford Courant |accessdate=2012-08-22 |deadurl=yes |archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/20120824022837/http://www.courant.com:80/business/hc-us-submarine-20120822,0,234505.story |archivedate=24 August 2012 }}</ref> However, congressional inaction to fully resolve the [[United States fiscal cliff]] had put this in doubt.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.navytimes.com/news/2013/03/ap-navy-says-submarine-miami-repairs-uncertain-031813/ |title=Navy: Repairs to submarine Miami now uncertain |work=NavyTimes |last=Sharp |first=David |date=18 March 2013 |accessdate=5 July 2015}}</ref>


To keep costs down, spare parts from the recently decommissioned {{USS|Memphis|SSN-691|2}} were to be used to repair ''Miami''.<ref>[http://www.therepublic.com/view/story/f743aa38a4b94bc99c8559232027092c/CT--Submarine-Fire] {{dead link|date=February 2013}}</ref> Furthermore, integrity checks on the hull did not show changes to its metallurgy or strength; fixing the internal sections would be much cheaper than replacing hull sections.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.defenseindustrydaily.com/South-Beached-Fire-and-Fixes-aboard-USS-Miami-07539/ |title=Fire and Fixes aboard USS Miami |publisher=Defenseindustrydaily.com |date=2 October 2012 |accessdate=5 July 2015}}</ref> At first glance, it seemed more prudent to repair ''Miami'' in the same manner as the fellow ''Los Angeles''-class boat {{USS|San Francisco|SSN-711|2}} since such a repair would cost "only" (around) 80 million USD.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.navytimes.com/news/2008/10/navy_sub_surgery_102108w/ |last=Ewing |first=Philip |title=Transplant complete, attack sub floats again |work=NavyTimes |date=21 October 2008 |accessdate=5 July 2015}} {{subscription required}}</ref> However, it should be noted that the hull of ''Memphis'' was already 26 years old (as of 2012). ''Memphis'' is also a different version (or "flight") of 688 submarine, as it was not built with the vertical launch system that the newer ''Miami'' has,<ref>[http://www.public.navy.mil/subfor/csg2/Pages/USSMemphis(SSN691).aspx] {{dead link|date=July 2015}}</ref> thus making the hull of ''Memphis'' incompatible with that of ''Miami''.{{Citation needed|date=October 2013}}
To keep costs down, spare parts from the recently decommissioned {{USS|Memphis|SSN-691|2}} were to be used to repair ''Miami''.<ref>[http://www.therepublic.com/view/story/f743aa38a4b94bc99c8559232027092c/CT--Submarine-Fire] {{dead link|date=February 2013}}</ref> Furthermore, integrity checks on the hull did not show changes to its metallurgy or strength; fixing the internal sections would be much cheaper than replacing hull sections.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.defenseindustrydaily.com/South-Beached-Fire-and-Fixes-aboard-USS-Miami-07539/ |title=Fire and Fixes aboard USS Miami |publisher=Defenseindustrydaily.com |date=2 October 2012 |accessdate=5 July 2015}}</ref> At first glance, it seemed more prudent to repair ''Miami'' in the same manner as the fellow ''Los Angeles''-class boat {{USS|San Francisco|SSN-711|2}} since such a repair would cost "only" (around) 80 million USD.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.navytimes.com/news/2008/10/navy_sub_surgery_102108w/ |last=Ewing |first=Philip |title=Transplant complete, attack sub floats again |work=NavyTimes |date=21 October 2008 |accessdate=5 July 2015}} {{subscription required}}</ref> However, it should be noted that the hull of ''Memphis'' was already 26 years old (as of 2012). ''Memphis'' is also a different version (or "flight") of 688 submarine, as it was not built with the vertical launch system that the newer ''Miami'' has,<ref>[http://www.public.navy.mil/subfor/csg2/Pages/USSMemphis(SSN691).aspx] {{wayback|url=http://www.public.navy.mil/subfor/csg2/Pages/USSMemphis(SSN691).aspx |date=20131029191226 |df=y }}</ref> thus making the hull of ''Memphis'' incompatible with that of ''Miami''.{{Citation needed|date=October 2013}}


On 6 August 2013, the U.S. Navy announced its intention to decommission ''Miami'', concluding the cost of repairs is more than it can afford in a time of [[Budget sequestration in 2013|budget cuts]]. A "comprehensive damage assessment" found that while the boat could have theoretically been repaired, the necessary repairs were more extensive than first anticipated. This raised the expected repair costs from $450 million to $700 million. At that cost, repairing the boat would have required the cancellation of work on several other submarines and surface ships. In the end, the Navy determined that repairing ''Miami'' was not considered worth weakening overall fleet readiness. One factor in the heightened cost estimate was the effect of "environmentally-assisted cracking" in the steel piping and fasteners used in the air, hydraulic, and cooling water systems, which required more equipment to be replaced than previously thought. The U.S. Navy will lose five deployments ''Miami'' was to make over the ten years that remained in its service life, but funds will be used to support other vital maintenance efforts to improve the wholeness and readiness of the fleet.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://navylive.dodlive.mil/2013/08/07/uss-miami-a-tangible-impact-to-readiness-from-sequestration |title=USS Miami: A Tangible Impact to Readiness from Sequestration |publisher=Navy Live |last=Breckenridge |first=Richard |date=7 August 2013 |accessdate=5 July 2015}}</ref> The sub was officially decommissioned on 28 March 2014, to be disposed of via the nuclear [[Ship-Submarine Recycling Program]].<ref>{{cite web |last=McDermott |first=Jennifer |url=http://www.stripes.com/news/us/fire-stricken-submarine-uss-miami-is-decommissioned-1.275179#.UziilcKRVZI |title=Fire-stricken submarine USS Miami is decommissioned |work=[[The Day (New London)|The Day]] |date=29 March 2014 |publisher=''[[Stars and Stripes (newspaper)|Stars and Stripes]]'' |accessdate=5 July 2015}}</ref>
On 6 August 2013, the U.S. Navy announced its intention to decommission ''Miami'', concluding the cost of repairs is more than it can afford in a time of [[Budget sequestration in 2013|budget cuts]]. A "comprehensive damage assessment" found that while the boat could have theoretically been repaired, the necessary repairs were more extensive than first anticipated. This raised the expected repair costs from $450 million to $700 million. At that cost, repairing the boat would have required the cancellation of work on several other submarines and surface ships. In the end, the Navy determined that repairing ''Miami'' was not considered worth weakening overall fleet readiness. One factor in the heightened cost estimate was the effect of "environmentally-assisted cracking" in the steel piping and fasteners used in the air, hydraulic, and cooling water systems, which required more equipment to be replaced than previously thought. The U.S. Navy will lose five deployments ''Miami'' was to make over the ten years that remained in its service life, but funds will be used to support other vital maintenance efforts to improve the wholeness and readiness of the fleet.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://navylive.dodlive.mil/2013/08/07/uss-miami-a-tangible-impact-to-readiness-from-sequestration |title=USS Miami: A Tangible Impact to Readiness from Sequestration |publisher=Navy Live |last=Breckenridge |first=Richard |date=7 August 2013 |accessdate=5 July 2015}}</ref> The sub was officially decommissioned on 28 March 2014, to be disposed of via the nuclear [[Ship-Submarine Recycling Program]].<ref>{{cite web |last=McDermott |first=Jennifer |url=http://www.stripes.com/news/us/fire-stricken-submarine-uss-miami-is-decommissioned-1.275179#.UziilcKRVZI |title=Fire-stricken submarine USS Miami is decommissioned |work=[[The Day (New London)|The Day]] |date=29 March 2014 |publisher=''[[Stars and Stripes (newspaper)|Stars and Stripes]]'' |accessdate=5 July 2015}}</ref>

Revision as of 17:25, 11 February 2016

The USS Miami in Port Everglades, Florida in April 2004.
USS Miami moored to a Port Everglades pier in April 2004.
History
United States
NameMiami
NamesakeCity of Miami, Florida
Awarded28 November 1983
BuilderGeneral Dynamics Electric Boat
Laid down24 October 1986
Launched12 November 1988
Sponsored byJane P. Wilkinson
Commissioned30 June 1990
Decommissioned28 March 2014
Out of service8 August 2013
HomeportGroton, Connecticut, U.S.
IdentificationSSN-755
Motto"No Free Rides, Everybody Rows!"
FateRemoved from service, sent for scrapping[1][2]
Badge
General characteristics
Class and typeTemplate:Sclass-
Displacement
  • 5,751 long tons (5,843 t) light
  • 6,146 long tons (6,245 t) full
  • 395 long tons (401 t) dead
Length110.3 m (361 ft 11 in)
Beam10 m (32 ft 10 in)
Draft9.4 m (30 ft 10 in)
PropulsionS6G nuclear reactor
Complement12 officers, 98 men
Armament

USS Miami (SSN-755) was a United States Navy Template:Sclass- attack submarine. She was the third vessel of the U.S. Navy to be named after Miami, Florida. Miami was the forty-fourth Los Angeles-class (688) submarine and the fifth Improved Los Angeles-class (688I) submarine to be built and commissioned. The contract to build her was awarded to the Electric Boat division of General Dynamics Corporation in Groton, Connecticut, on 28 November 1983 and her keel was laid down on 24 October 1986. She was launched on 12 November 1988 and commissioned on 30 June 1990 with Commander Thomas W. Mader in command.

On 1 March 2012 Miami pulled into the Portsmouth Naval Shipyard in Kittery, Maine for a scheduled 20-month Engineered Overhaul (EOH) and system upgrades. A civilian employee started a fire aboard the boat on 23 May 2012. It impacted the forward compartment of the submarine which includes crew living, command and control spaces and torpedo room. The revised estimate to restore Miami increased to approximately $450 million with completion estimated on 30 April 2015. Due to budget cuts, it was announced 6 August 2013 that the vessel would not be repaired and placed on the inactive list.[1] On 28 March 2014, Miami was formally decommissioned.[3]

History

1999

Miami became the first submarine to conduct combat operations in two theaters since World War II (Operation Desert Fox and Operation Allied Force).[4]

2012 fire

Miami enters dry dock at the Portsmouth Naval Shipyard on 15 March 2012 to begin an engineered overhaul. She was severely damaged by fire two months later.

At 5:41 p.m. EDT on 23 May 2012, fire crews were called with a report of a fire on Miami while being overhauled at the Portsmouth Naval Shipyard in Kittery, Maine. At the time the submarine was on a scheduled 20-month maintenance cycle,[5][6] indicating the submarine was undergoing an extensive overhaul called an "Engineering Overhaul".[7] Injuries to seven firefighters had been reported by national media.[8] One crewmember suffered broken ribs when he fell through a hole left by removed deck plates during the fire.[9] It took firefighters 12 hours to extinguish the fire.[10]

Originally the U.S. Navy reported that the fire started when an industrial vacuum cleaner, used "to clean worksites on the sub after shipyard workers’ shifts," sucked up a heat source that ignited debris inside the vacuum. On 23 July 2012 Casey J. Fury, a civilian painter and sandblaster working on the sub, was indicted on two counts of arson after confessing to starting the fire. Fury admitted to setting the 23 May fire by igniting some rags on the top bunk of a bunk room. He claimed to have started the fire to get out of work early.[11][12][13][14] On 15 March 2013 Fury was sentenced to over 17 years in federal prison and ordered to pay $400 million in restitution.[15]

The U.S. Navy debated on whether to scrap the boat. Both of Maine's Senators, Susan Collins and Olympia Snowe, advocated repairing her.[16] The U.S. Navy asked Congress to add $220 million to the operations and maintenance budget for emergent and unfunded ship repairs which would be used to help repair Miami.[17] The final outcome was a choice to repair the submarine at an estimated total cost of $450 million. The boat was expected to return to service sometime in 2015.[18] However, congressional inaction to fully resolve the United States fiscal cliff had put this in doubt.[19]

To keep costs down, spare parts from the recently decommissioned Memphis were to be used to repair Miami.[20] Furthermore, integrity checks on the hull did not show changes to its metallurgy or strength; fixing the internal sections would be much cheaper than replacing hull sections.[21] At first glance, it seemed more prudent to repair Miami in the same manner as the fellow Los Angeles-class boat San Francisco since such a repair would cost "only" (around) 80 million USD.[22] However, it should be noted that the hull of Memphis was already 26 years old (as of 2012). Memphis is also a different version (or "flight") of 688 submarine, as it was not built with the vertical launch system that the newer Miami has,[23] thus making the hull of Memphis incompatible with that of Miami.[citation needed]

On 6 August 2013, the U.S. Navy announced its intention to decommission Miami, concluding the cost of repairs is more than it can afford in a time of budget cuts. A "comprehensive damage assessment" found that while the boat could have theoretically been repaired, the necessary repairs were more extensive than first anticipated. This raised the expected repair costs from $450 million to $700 million. At that cost, repairing the boat would have required the cancellation of work on several other submarines and surface ships. In the end, the Navy determined that repairing Miami was not considered worth weakening overall fleet readiness. One factor in the heightened cost estimate was the effect of "environmentally-assisted cracking" in the steel piping and fasteners used in the air, hydraulic, and cooling water systems, which required more equipment to be replaced than previously thought. The U.S. Navy will lose five deployments Miami was to make over the ten years that remained in its service life, but funds will be used to support other vital maintenance efforts to improve the wholeness and readiness of the fleet.[24] The sub was officially decommissioned on 28 March 2014, to be disposed of via the nuclear Ship-Submarine Recycling Program.[25]

Miami is the first submarine and nuclear-powered ship to be lost in a U.S. naval shipyard, and the second warship lost in a U.S. naval shipyard after the loss of the steam frigate Merrimack in 1861.[citation needed]

Commanding officers

USS Miami had eleven commanding officers (COs), all with the equivalent rank of commander, over her lifetime.

Commander Rolf B. Spelker served as Miami's eleventh and final commanding officer after assuming command from Commander Roger E. Meyer at Portsmouth Naval Shipyard. The Navy's announcement of her decommissioning means Meyer was the last commanding officer to have deployed with the ship itself. The start of the ship's original engineering overhaul (EOH) and later fire recovery overhaul were overseen by Meyer from March 2012 to November 2013. Spelker oversaw the defueling of the ship's nuclear reactor, inactivation, and decommissioning.

Commanding Officers

  • Commander Thomas W. Mader (1988 – 1990)
  • Commander Houston K. Jones (1990 – 1993)
  • Commander Don H. Potter, Jr. (1993 – 1995)
  • Commander Larry B. Olsen (1995 – 1998)
  • Commander James P. Ransom, III (1998 – 2000)
  • Commander Randall G. Richards (2000 – 2003)
  • Commander Joseph B. Wiegand (2003 – 2005)
  • Commander Richard R. Bryant (2005 – 2008)
  • Commander Dennis R. Boyer (2008 – 2010)
  • Commander Roger E. Meyer (2010 – 2013)
  • Commander Rolf B. Spelker (2013 – 2014)

Previous mottos

  • "Can do, will do, glad to." This motto was used prior to operation Desert Fox.
  • "First to fire. Twice to fire." This motto was adopted after returning to home port after the 1998-1999 deployment.
1st edition (publ. Berkley Books)

References

  1. ^ a b Miller, Kevin; Hoey, Dennis (6 August 2013). "Navy abandons plan to fix nuclear sub burned in Maine". Kennebec Journal. Retrieved 5 July 2015.
  2. ^ [1] Template:Wayback
  3. ^ "Decommissioning today for fire-damaged sub Miami". Militarytimes.com. Associated Press. 28 March 2014. Retrieved 5 July 2015.
  4. ^ "USS Miami (SSN 755) History". uscarriers.net. Retrieved 5 July 2015.
  5. ^ "Fire Extinguished On Nuclear Submarine In Maine". CBS Boston. 24 May 2012. Retrieved 5 July 2015.
  6. ^ "Fire reported on nuclear-powered submarine at Maine shipyard". Necn.com. 23 May 2012. Retrieved 16 February 2013. [dead link]
  7. ^ Pike, John (29 October 2003). "SSN-688 Los Angeles-class Engineered Refueling Overhaul (ERO)". Globalsecurity.org. Retrieved 5 July 2015.
  8. ^ ABC's Good Morning America 24 May 2012
  9. ^ Sharp, David (10 September 2012). "Nuclear Submarine Fire Sparks Two Navy Probes". Portland Press Herald. {{cite web}}: Missing or empty |url= (help)
  10. ^ Sharp, David (6 August 2013). "Navy drops plans to repair fire-damaged submarine USS Miami, citing budget restraints". Times Colonist. Associated Press. Archived from the original on 30 October 2013. Retrieved 16 February 2013. {{cite news}}: Unknown parameter |deadurl= ignored (|url-status= suggested) (help)
  11. ^ "Navy: No update on USS Miami investigation". boston.com. Associated Press. Retrieved 5 July 2015.
  12. ^ McMahon, Charles (23 July 2012). "Suspect in $400M sub blaze appears in court". seacoastonline.com. Retrieved 5 July 2015.
  13. ^ "Man charged in fire on USS Miami". www.wcvb.com. Retrieved 5 July 2015.
  14. ^ Canfield, Clarke (2012). "Civilian worker charged with setting both fires aboard, near submarine in Maine shipyard". Associated Press. Archived from the original on 23 July 2012. Retrieved 5 July 2015.
  15. ^ Boyette, Chris (16 March 2013). "Shipyard worker sentenced to 17 years for $400 million submarine fire". CNN. Retrieved 5 July 2015.
  16. ^ Hoey, Dennis (7 June 2012). "Navy: Fire on nuclear sub started in vacuum cleaner". Portland Press Herald. Retrieved 5 July 2015.
  17. ^ McDermott, Jennifer (20 July 2012). "Links to USS Miami fire explored". theday.com. Retrieved 5 July 2015.
  18. ^ "USS Miami Expected Back In Service In 2015". Hartford Courant. Archived from the original on 24 August 2012. Retrieved 22 August 2012. {{cite web}}: Unknown parameter |deadurl= ignored (|url-status= suggested) (help)
  19. ^ Sharp, David (18 March 2013). "Navy: Repairs to submarine Miami now uncertain". NavyTimes. Retrieved 5 July 2015.
  20. ^ [2] [dead link]
  21. ^ "Fire and Fixes aboard USS Miami". Defenseindustrydaily.com. 2 October 2012. Retrieved 5 July 2015.
  22. ^ Ewing, Philip (21 October 2008). "Transplant complete, attack sub floats again". NavyTimes. Retrieved 5 July 2015. (subscription required)
  23. ^ [3] Template:Wayback
  24. ^ Breckenridge, Richard (7 August 2013). "USS Miami: A Tangible Impact to Readiness from Sequestration". Navy Live. Retrieved 5 July 2015.
  25. ^ McDermott, Jennifer (29 March 2014). "Fire-stricken submarine USS Miami is decommissioned". The Day. Stars and Stripes. Retrieved 5 July 2015. {{cite web}}: Italic or bold markup not allowed in: |publisher= (help)
  26. ^ Clancy, Tom (1993). Submarine: A Guided Tour Inside a Nuclear Warship. ISBN 0-425-13873-9.

This article includes information collected from the public domain sources Dictionary of American Naval Fighting Ships and Naval Vessel Register.