Jump to content

Talk:Cop Block: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
SineBot (talk | contribs)
m Signing comment by 128.163.239.15 - "→‎Neutrality discussion: new section"
Line 19: Line 19:
*Further discussion on the backgrounds of the founders, specifically on their anarchistic views
*Further discussion on the backgrounds of the founders, specifically on their anarchistic views


*Correction of statements that may be taken as biased, including paragraph 3: ". . . which is not typically a crime under the 1st Amendment as well as many state laws"; if this is to be mentioned, then a thorough analysis of the charges should be provided including citation of the charges itself and citations of the law(s) broken (or not broken) <!-- Template:Unsigned IP --><small class="autosigned">—&nbsp;Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/128.163.239.15|128.163.239.15]] ([[User talk:128.163.239.15|talk]]) 16:10, 13 August 2016 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
*Correction of statements that may be taken as biased, including Activities, paragraph 3: ". . . which is not typically a crime under the 1st Amendment as well as many state laws"; if this is to be mentioned, then a thorough analysis of the charges should be provided including citation of the charges itself and citations of the law(s) broken (or not broken) <!-- Template:Unsigned IP --><small class="autosigned">—&nbsp;Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/128.163.239.15|128.163.239.15]] ([[User talk:128.163.239.15|talk]]) 16:10, 13 August 2016 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->

Revision as of 16:11, 13 August 2016

Neutrality discussion

Some points that should be addressed in this article include:

  • The relation of this website to the Sovereign citizen movement: Taking the last name Freeman (in the case of Adam Mueller), believing law enforcement does not have authority strictly beyond the boundaries of the Constitution, etc.
  • Re-wording the introduction paragraph of this page (Not everyone would agree that Cop Block exists solely to make police accountable for their actions; it could be argued that Cop Block advocates for a smaller law enforcement network with less authority)
  • Further discussion on the backgrounds of the founders, specifically on their anarchistic views
  • Correction of statements that may be taken as biased, including Activities, paragraph 3: ". . . which is not typically a crime under the 1st Amendment as well as many state laws"; if this is to be mentioned, then a thorough analysis of the charges should be provided including citation of the charges itself and citations of the law(s) broken (or not broken) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 128.163.239.15 (talk) 16:10, 13 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]