Jump to content

Talk:Primary Chronicle: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
No edit summary
Line 13: Line 13:


In the three editions section, why does it not say what sources/manuscripts we find the first edition in? It does this for the other 2 editions. For the sake of continuity it is important. <small class="autosigned">—&nbsp;Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/37.191.57.40|37.191.57.40]] ([[User talk:37.191.57.40|talk]]) 15:45, 22 April 2015 (UTC)</small><!-- Template:Unsigned IP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
In the three editions section, why does it not say what sources/manuscripts we find the first edition in? It does this for the other 2 editions. For the sake of continuity it is important. <small class="autosigned">—&nbsp;Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/37.191.57.40|37.191.57.40]] ([[User talk:37.191.57.40|talk]]) 15:45, 22 April 2015 (UTC)</small><!-- Template:Unsigned IP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->

: I read it in Alt-Slavonic (Old-Serbian/ Old Russian..=all the same ) language.


== Radziwiłł Chronicle ==
== Radziwiłł Chronicle ==


Why is [[Radziwiłł Chronicle]] not mentioned among the manuscripts? Isn't it as important as the Laurentian and Hypatian codex? --[[User:Off-shell|Off-shell]] ([[User talk:Off-shell|talk]]) 10:12, 8 November 2015 (UTC)
Why is [[Radziwiłł Chronicle]] not mentioned among the manuscripts? Isn't it as important as the Laurentian and Hypatian codex? --[[User:Off-shell|Off-shell]] ([[User talk:Off-shell|talk]]) 10:12, 8 November 2015 (UTC)

==Vinca Calendar is Used ?==
Reading the Original Chronicles I was suprised that the time was calculated using Vinca : Year 6525 means [1017] ! This is Serbian Calendar that is still used in Serbia ! Interesting - it could means that we don't know how old the Slavonic culture might be ! Youtube: sanskrit = serbian !
* No, it is not. --[[User:Ghirlandajo|Ghirla]]<sup>[[User_talk:Ghirlandajo|-трёп-]]</sup> 09:16, 9 November 2015 (UTC)
* No, it is not. --[[User:Ghirlandajo|Ghirla]]<sup>[[User_talk:Ghirlandajo|-трёп-]]</sup> 09:16, 9 November 2015 (UTC)

Revision as of 22:18, 4 September 2016

What language?

This article doesn't clearly explain in what language or languages the Primary Chronicle is written. Does anyone have a reliable source for this information? Moxfyre (ǝɹʎℲxoɯ | contrib) 01:27, 29 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

In the three editions section, why does it not say what sources/manuscripts we find the first edition in? It does this for the other 2 editions. For the sake of continuity it is important. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 37.191.57.40 (talk) 15:45, 22 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I read it in Alt-Slavonic (Old-Serbian/ Old Russian..=all the same ) language.

Radziwiłł Chronicle

Why is Radziwiłł Chronicle not mentioned among the manuscripts? Isn't it as important as the Laurentian and Hypatian codex? --Off-shell (talk) 10:12, 8 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Vinca Calendar is Used ?

Reading the Original Chronicles I was suprised that the time was calculated using Vinca : Year 6525 means [1017] ! This is Serbian Calendar that is still used in Serbia ! Interesting - it could means that we don't know how old the Slavonic culture might be ! Youtube: sanskrit = serbian !