Jump to content

Talk:Paddington Waterside: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
BattyBot (talk | contribs)
m Talk page general fixes & other cleanup using AWB
Line 10: Line 10:
Is this article really worth keeping? It seems to relate to a housing development in London, but somehow ends up being a "rail related" stub because it occupies former railway land. Should it not be deleted?[[User:ColourSarge|ColourSarge]] 17:13, 21 July 2007 (UTC)
Is this article really worth keeping? It seems to relate to a housing development in London, but somehow ends up being a "rail related" stub because it occupies former railway land. Should it not be deleted?[[User:ColourSarge|ColourSarge]] 17:13, 21 July 2007 (UTC)
:It should definitely be kept - this is a huge development, as evidenced by the fact that several of the subprojects within it have their own article. It does look a bit healthier now,<g> it could go to [[WP:GA]] assessment after a bit of time to prove stability. [[User:Le Deluge|Le Deluge]] ([[User talk:Le Deluge|talk]]) 20:30, 29 October 2010 (UTC)
:It should definitely be kept - this is a huge development, as evidenced by the fact that several of the subprojects within it have their own article. It does look a bit healthier now,<g> it could go to [[WP:GA]] assessment after a bit of time to prove stability. [[User:Le Deluge|Le Deluge]] ([[User talk:Le Deluge|talk]]) 20:30, 29 October 2010 (UTC)

I'd like to see it kept. It marks the place of a boater at an important overnight stop between the suburbs and Limehouse Basin, 1 day away. I have a better picture of the Basin taken alongside St Mary's and showing the vibrancy of the buildings there against the water. Not just for boaters, there are opportunities for commuters, and people working in the buildings to sit on a bench and take in something of the atmosphere for a time.

Revision as of 18:31, 5 September 2016


Keep?

Is this article really worth keeping? It seems to relate to a housing development in London, but somehow ends up being a "rail related" stub because it occupies former railway land. Should it not be deleted?ColourSarge 17:13, 21 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It should definitely be kept - this is a huge development, as evidenced by the fact that several of the subprojects within it have their own article. It does look a bit healthier now,<g> it could go to WP:GA assessment after a bit of time to prove stability. Le Deluge (talk) 20:30, 29 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I'd like to see it kept. It marks the place of a boater at an important overnight stop between the suburbs and Limehouse Basin, 1 day away. I have a better picture of the Basin taken alongside St Mary's and showing the vibrancy of the buildings there against the water. Not just for boaters, there are opportunities for commuters, and people working in the buildings to sit on a bench and take in something of the atmosphere for a time.