Talk:Paddington Waterside: Difference between revisions
Appearance
Content deleted Content added
m Talk page general fixes & other cleanup using AWB |
|||
Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
Is this article really worth keeping? It seems to relate to a housing development in London, but somehow ends up being a "rail related" stub because it occupies former railway land. Should it not be deleted?[[User:ColourSarge|ColourSarge]] 17:13, 21 July 2007 (UTC) |
Is this article really worth keeping? It seems to relate to a housing development in London, but somehow ends up being a "rail related" stub because it occupies former railway land. Should it not be deleted?[[User:ColourSarge|ColourSarge]] 17:13, 21 July 2007 (UTC) |
||
:It should definitely be kept - this is a huge development, as evidenced by the fact that several of the subprojects within it have their own article. It does look a bit healthier now,<g> it could go to [[WP:GA]] assessment after a bit of time to prove stability. [[User:Le Deluge|Le Deluge]] ([[User talk:Le Deluge|talk]]) 20:30, 29 October 2010 (UTC) |
:It should definitely be kept - this is a huge development, as evidenced by the fact that several of the subprojects within it have their own article. It does look a bit healthier now,<g> it could go to [[WP:GA]] assessment after a bit of time to prove stability. [[User:Le Deluge|Le Deluge]] ([[User talk:Le Deluge|talk]]) 20:30, 29 October 2010 (UTC) |
||
I'd like to see it kept. It marks the place of a boater at an important overnight stop between the suburbs and Limehouse Basin, 1 day away. I have a better picture of the Basin taken alongside St Mary's and showing the vibrancy of the buildings there against the water. Not just for boaters, there are opportunities for commuters, and people working in the buildings to sit on a bench and take in something of the atmosphere for a time. |
Revision as of 18:31, 5 September 2016
This article is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
|
A fact from Paddington Waterside appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 7 November 2010 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|
Keep?
Is this article really worth keeping? It seems to relate to a housing development in London, but somehow ends up being a "rail related" stub because it occupies former railway land. Should it not be deleted?ColourSarge 17:13, 21 July 2007 (UTC)
- It should definitely be kept - this is a huge development, as evidenced by the fact that several of the subprojects within it have their own article. It does look a bit healthier now,<g> it could go to WP:GA assessment after a bit of time to prove stability. Le Deluge (talk) 20:30, 29 October 2010 (UTC)
I'd like to see it kept. It marks the place of a boater at an important overnight stop between the suburbs and Limehouse Basin, 1 day away. I have a better picture of the Basin taken alongside St Mary's and showing the vibrancy of the buildings there against the water. Not just for boaters, there are opportunities for commuters, and people working in the buildings to sit on a bench and take in something of the atmosphere for a time.