Jump to content

Talk:Cyclops (play): Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Line 3: Line 3:
{{WikiProject Classical Greece and Rome|class=Start|importance=Mid}}
{{WikiProject Classical Greece and Rome|class=Start|importance=Mid}}
{{WikiProject Theatre|class=Start|importance=Mid}}
{{WikiProject Theatre|class=Start|importance=Mid}}

{{dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment | course = Wikipedia:Wiki_Ed/Brooklyn_College,_CUNY/THEA_7214X_Global_Theater_History_and_Theory_I_(Fall_2016) | assignments = [[User:DaniellaBenavides|DaniellaBenavides]] }}
}}
}}



Revision as of 18:06, 12 September 2016

"No man" Pun

I'm entirely sure what this means when it says that the word meaning "no man" is used in the subjunctive. Subjunctive, as with all moods, is a quality of verbs, not of nouns or adjectives. Is there anyone familiar with the Greek text who can correct this (in whatever fashion is required)?

"No man" Pun

I believe they're getting at the Μή τις / Μήτις pun - but theres no subjunctive here, so have removed reference to the mood.--Lagodion 21:54, 23 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The text under the heading of Euripides' Cyclops and the structure of the satyr play of The satyr play and Euripides' Cyclops rightly belongs in a discussion of the play. Bongomatic 08:20, 5 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disagree, sort of I can't attest that the section belongs where it is, but I think it would go better at Satyr play than Cyclops (play). It may be appropriate for both, though. We could perhaps put it in both articles. Tealwisp (talk) 23:44, 5 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]