User talk:Rugby9090: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 08:49, 22 September 2016

Welcome!

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. The following links will help you begin editing on Wikipedia:

Please bear these points in mind while editing Wikipedia

Respect copyrights – do not copy and paste text or images directly from other websites.
Maintain a neutral point of view – this is one of Wikipedia's core policies.
Take particular care while adding biographical material about a living person to any Wikipedia page and follow Wikipedia's Biography of Living Persons policy. Particularly, controversial and negative statements should be referenced with multiple reliable sources.
No edit warring or abuse of multiple accounts.
If you are testing, please use the Sandbox to do so.
Do not add troublesome content to any article, such as: copyrighted text, libel, advertising or promotional messages, and text that is not related to an article's subject. Deliberately adding such content or otherwise editing articles maliciously is considered vandalism; doing so will result in your account or IP being blocked from editing.
Do not use talk pages as discussion or forum pages as Wikipedia is not a forum.

The Wikipedia tutorial is a good place to start learning about Wikipedia. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and discussion pages using four tildes, like this: ~~~~ (the software will replace them with your signature and the date). Again, welcome! Kautilya3 (talk) 12:56, 21 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Rugby9090, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Rugby9090! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like 78.26 (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:04, 21 September 2016 (UTC)

Citing policies

Please do not citing Wikipedia policies, as you have done here, without having first read them and understood them. If you continue to do this it will be considered WP:Disruptive editing. -- Kautilya3 (talk) 20:11, 21 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

User:Kautilya3 please go through WP:FRINGE. Author must provide valid citation and should not give WP:UNDUE. Rugby9090 (talk) 20:39, 21 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Request for unblock

This user is asking that their block be reviewed:

Rugby9090 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

This morning my account has been blocked without any intimation. Please explain the reason. Thanks RegentsPark Rugby9090 (talk) 07:25, 22 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Notes:

In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.

Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=This morning my account has been blocked without any intimation. Please explain the reason. Thanks [[RegentsPark]]  [[User:Rugby9090|Rugby9090]] ([[User talk:Rugby9090#top|talk]]) 07:25, 22 September 2016 (UTC) |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=This morning my account has been blocked without any intimation. Please explain the reason. Thanks [[RegentsPark]]  [[User:Rugby9090|Rugby9090]] ([[User talk:Rugby9090#top|talk]]) 07:25, 22 September 2016 (UTC) |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=This morning my account has been blocked without any intimation. Please explain the reason. Thanks [[RegentsPark]]  [[User:Rugby9090|Rugby9090]] ([[User talk:Rugby9090#top|talk]]) 07:25, 22 September 2016 (UTC) |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}

This user is asking that their block be reviewed:

Rugby9090 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

This Morning my account had been blocked without any intimation from admins or other users. I have checked the Block list [1] and came to know that Kautilya3 has reported it as alleged sock puppet [2]. I would like to clarify Admin so that they can reevaluate and also request them to please give at least 24 hours before placing any block on any user to give them a chance for proper justification.

Reasons Explained: 1./2. My Account has been recently created and Focused on a particular issue. Answer : Yes, this account is recently created. WP:NEWSEVENT 'Breaking News' Article [3] has persuaded me to share my views. Hence my focus was on this article.

3. My signature are always on formating basis. some time on same line and some time on other. ^[1] I believe all authors tend to consider format before sharing.

4. I have always tried to cited policies to inform users about Wikipedia policies. You can also check any post, there are valid justification.

5. Yes, i believe Kautilya3 has not responded with constructive authorship. I have requested him many time on Article Talk Page. Based on his request, I have created NPOV Notice Board [4] and DRN [5]

6. My response time also vary from time to time. Some time it takes up to 1 hour if i have to read and analyse [6]

In addition, I have always respected other authors and have not contributed on article page. All my communications are on Talk Page.

As per analysis by GeneralizationsAreBad, I feel its completely hypothetical and doesn't correspond to facts / log. As for DRN request, it was done on request of Kautilya3 [7]. Secondly it took me around 2 hours to file DRN as first 3 DRN request resulted in API Error (Admins can verify this from log)

I would request to RegentsPark to re-evaluate and re-consider based on facts like Accounts, IP, above given responses and i would ask other admins Mark_Arsten Doug_Weller to please look into this matter and give their neutral opinion.

Notes:

In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.

Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=This Morning my account had been blocked without any intimation from admins or other users. I have checked the Block list [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:BlockList/Rugby9090] and came to know that [[Kautilya3]] has reported it as alleged sock puppet [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/Smart.maverick]. I would like to clarify Admin so that they can reevaluate and also request them to please give at least 24 hours before placing any block on any user to give them a chance for proper justification.

Reasons Explained:
1./2. My Account has been recently created and Focused on a particular issue.
Answer : Yes, this account is recently created. [[WP:NEWSEVENT]] 'Breaking News' Article [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2016_Uri_attack] has persuaded me to share my views. Hence my focus was on this article.

3. My signature are always on formating basis. some time on same line and some time on other. ^[1]
I believe all authors tend to consider format before sharing.

4. I have always tried to cited policies to inform users about Wikipedia policies. You can also check any post, there are valid justification.

5. Yes, i believe [[Kautilya3]] has not responded with constructive authorship. I have requested him many time on Article Talk Page. Based on his request, I have created NPOV Notice Board [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:2016_Uri_attack#Other_Nations] and DRN [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Dispute_resolution_noticeboard#Talk:2016_Uri_attack.23Other_Nations]

6. My response time also vary from time to time. Some time it takes up to 1 hour if i have to read and analyse [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:2016_Uri_attack#Other_Nations] 

In addition, I have always respected other authors and have not contributed on article page. All my communications are on Talk Page.

As per analysis by [[GeneralizationsAreBad]], I feel its completely hypothetical and doesn't correspond to facts / log. As for DRN request, it was done on request of [[Kautilya3]] [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:2016_Uri_attack#Other_Nations]. Secondly it took me around 2 hours to file DRN as first 3 DRN request resulted in API Error (Admins can verify this from log)

I would request to [[RegentsPark]] to '''re-evaluate and re-consider based on facts''' like Accounts, IP, above given responses and i would ask other admins [[Mark_Arsten]] [[Doug_Weller]] to please look into this matter and give their neutral opinion. |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=This Morning my account had been blocked without any intimation from admins or other users. I have checked the Block list [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:BlockList/Rugby9090] and came to know that [[Kautilya3]] has reported it as alleged sock puppet [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/Smart.maverick]. I would like to clarify Admin so that they can reevaluate and also request them to please give at least 24 hours before placing any block on any user to give them a chance for proper justification.

Reasons Explained:
1./2. My Account has been recently created and Focused on a particular issue.
Answer : Yes, this account is recently created. [[WP:NEWSEVENT]] 'Breaking News' Article [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2016_Uri_attack] has persuaded me to share my views. Hence my focus was on this article.

3. My signature are always on formating basis. some time on same line and some time on other. ^[1]
I believe all authors tend to consider format before sharing.

4. I have always tried to cited policies to inform users about Wikipedia policies. You can also check any post, there are valid justification.

5. Yes, i believe [[Kautilya3]] has not responded with constructive authorship. I have requested him many time on Article Talk Page. Based on his request, I have created NPOV Notice Board [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:2016_Uri_attack#Other_Nations] and DRN [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Dispute_resolution_noticeboard#Talk:2016_Uri_attack.23Other_Nations]

6. My response time also vary from time to time. Some time it takes up to 1 hour if i have to read and analyse [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:2016_Uri_attack#Other_Nations] 

In addition, I have always respected other authors and have not contributed on article page. All my communications are on Talk Page.

As per analysis by [[GeneralizationsAreBad]], I feel its completely hypothetical and doesn't correspond to facts / log. As for DRN request, it was done on request of [[Kautilya3]] [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:2016_Uri_attack#Other_Nations]. Secondly it took me around 2 hours to file DRN as first 3 DRN request resulted in API Error (Admins can verify this from log)

I would request to [[RegentsPark]] to '''re-evaluate and re-consider based on facts''' like Accounts, IP, above given responses and i would ask other admins [[Mark_Arsten]] [[Doug_Weller]] to please look into this matter and give their neutral opinion. |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=This Morning my account had been blocked without any intimation from admins or other users. I have checked the Block list [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:BlockList/Rugby9090] and came to know that [[Kautilya3]] has reported it as alleged sock puppet [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/Smart.maverick]. I would like to clarify Admin so that they can reevaluate and also request them to please give at least 24 hours before placing any block on any user to give them a chance for proper justification.

Reasons Explained:
1./2. My Account has been recently created and Focused on a particular issue.
Answer : Yes, this account is recently created. [[WP:NEWSEVENT]] 'Breaking News' Article [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2016_Uri_attack] has persuaded me to share my views. Hence my focus was on this article.

3. My signature are always on formating basis. some time on same line and some time on other. ^[1]
I believe all authors tend to consider format before sharing.

4. I have always tried to cited policies to inform users about Wikipedia policies. You can also check any post, there are valid justification.

5. Yes, i believe [[Kautilya3]] has not responded with constructive authorship. I have requested him many time on Article Talk Page. Based on his request, I have created NPOV Notice Board [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:2016_Uri_attack#Other_Nations] and DRN [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Dispute_resolution_noticeboard#Talk:2016_Uri_attack.23Other_Nations]

6. My response time also vary from time to time. Some time it takes up to 1 hour if i have to read and analyse [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:2016_Uri_attack#Other_Nations] 

In addition, I have always respected other authors and have not contributed on article page. All my communications are on Talk Page.

As per analysis by [[GeneralizationsAreBad]], I feel its completely hypothetical and doesn't correspond to facts / log. As for DRN request, it was done on request of [[Kautilya3]] [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:2016_Uri_attack#Other_Nations]. Secondly it took me around 2 hours to file DRN as first 3 DRN request resulted in API Error (Admins can verify this from log)

I would request to [[RegentsPark]] to '''re-evaluate and re-consider based on facts''' like Accounts, IP, above given responses and i would ask other admins [[Mark_Arsten]] [[Doug_Weller]] to please look into this matter and give their neutral opinion. |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}

^ https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:2016_Uri_attack#Other_Nations

[1] ttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:2016_Uri_attack#Other_Nations

[1]