Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anirudh Sethi: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
added delete |
|||
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
*<small>Note: There is a [[Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Aarushiyas|sockpuppet investigation]] going on against the creator of this article. [[User:GSS-1987|<span style="font-family: monospace;font-weight: bold;font-size: 16px;color: hsl(205, 98%, 55%); ">GSS</span>]] ([[User talk:GSS-1987|talk]]) 16:24, 9 October 2016 (UTC)</small> |
*<small>Note: There is a [[Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Aarushiyas|sockpuppet investigation]] going on against the creator of this article. [[User:GSS-1987|<span style="font-family: monospace;font-weight: bold;font-size: 16px;color: hsl(205, 98%, 55%); ">GSS</span>]] ([[User talk:GSS-1987|talk]]) 16:24, 9 October 2016 (UTC)</small> |
||
*'''Delete''' I didn't find any references to Sethi in the first two links. The first link is part of the contributors platform of Huffington Post, which is entirely controlled by the contributor, and thus is a blog without any editorial oversight. Thus it is not a reliable source, but it also does not mention Sethi as far as I can tell.[[User:Johnpacklambert|John Pack Lambert]] ([[User talk:Johnpacklambert|talk]]) 18:00, 9 October 2016 (UTC) |
*'''Delete''' I didn't find any references to Sethi in the first two links. The first link is part of the contributors platform of Huffington Post, which is entirely controlled by the contributor, and thus is a blog without any editorial oversight. Thus it is not a reliable source, but it also does not mention Sethi as far as I can tell.[[User:Johnpacklambert|John Pack Lambert]] ([[User talk:Johnpacklambert|talk]]) 18:00, 9 October 2016 (UTC) |
||
*'''Speedy delete''' As per nom. Doesn't qualify [[WP:NOTE]] [[User:Badnaam|Badnaam]] ([[User talk:Badnaam|talk]]) 19:54, 9 October 2016 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 19:55, 9 October 2016
- Anirudh Sethi (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Fails WP:GNG and also has WP:PROMO/WP:NPOV issues. Subject isn't mentioned in any of the references that aren't self-published. My own searches only turned up this, which at best counts as WP:1E. Kolbasz (talk) 12:20, 9 October 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 13:19, 9 October 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 13:19, 9 October 2016 (UTC)
- Delete and even the self-sourced references don't support the claims (e.g. the claim of "seven books" links to the existence of one) - David Gerard (talk) 14:29, 9 October 2016 (UTC)
- Note: There is a sockpuppet investigation going on against the creator of this article. GSS (talk) 16:24, 9 October 2016 (UTC)
- Delete I didn't find any references to Sethi in the first two links. The first link is part of the contributors platform of Huffington Post, which is entirely controlled by the contributor, and thus is a blog without any editorial oversight. Thus it is not a reliable source, but it also does not mention Sethi as far as I can tell.John Pack Lambert (talk) 18:00, 9 October 2016 (UTC)
- Speedy delete As per nom. Doesn't qualify WP:NOTE Badnaam (talk) 19:54, 9 October 2016 (UTC)