User talk:Octoberwoodland: Difference between revisions
Notification: listing at categories for discussion of Category:Muslim Related Attacks. (TW) |
→November 2016: remove trolling from contentious editor, topic already addressed on article talk page. |
||
Line 36: | Line 36: | ||
:I stay away from editing articles about the church -- it would be COI for me to edit those type of articles . [[User:Octoberwoodland|Octoberwoodland]] ([[User talk:Octoberwoodland#top|talk]]) 03:12, 23 October 2016 (UTC) |
:I stay away from editing articles about the church -- it would be COI for me to edit those type of articles . [[User:Octoberwoodland|Octoberwoodland]] ([[User talk:Octoberwoodland#top|talk]]) 03:12, 23 October 2016 (UTC) |
||
== November 2016 == |
|||
[[File:Information orange.svg|25px|alt=Information icon]] Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at [[:2016 Ohio State University attack]]. Your edits appear to constitute [[Wikipedia:Vandalism|vandalism]] and have been [[Help:Reverting|reverted]]. If you would like to experiment, please use the [[Wikipedia:Sandbox|sandbox]]. Repeated vandalism can result in the [[Wikipedia:Blocking policy|loss of editing privileges]]. Thank you.<!-- Template:uw-vandalism2 --> [[User:Parsley Man|Parsley Man]] ([[User talk:Parsley Man|talk]]) 23:04, 28 November 2016 (UTC) |
|||
:OK troll, the edit was not vandalism. [[User:Octoberwoodland|Octoberwoodland]] ([[User talk:Octoberwoodland#top|talk]]) 23:12, 28 November 2016 (UTC) |
|||
==[[:Category:Muslim Related Attacks]] has been nominated for discussion== |
==[[:Category:Muslim Related Attacks]] has been nominated for discussion== |
||
Revision as of 19:50, 30 November 2016
Hi! Octoberwoodland (talk) 23:26, 6 October 2016 (UTC)
Octoberwoodland, you are invited to the Teahouse!
![]() |
Hi Octoberwoodland! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. We hope to see you there!
Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:05, 7 October 2016 (UTC) |
Hello
Thank you for posting the {{COI editnotice}}. I should have done that awhile ago, I just haven't been involved in COI issues in so long that I forgot about that. I don't know if you have someone specific in mind, but if you do and you have pretty good reason to believe that there is a COI, should something be posted on their user page.
I haven't seen edits for awhile from the people I thought that this might have applied to - and by the current voting, two of us would have voted differently four or so days ago - so I cannot tell that way. But, I'm guessing you have more experience on other DT pages. Oh, I just thought of someone - I am about to revert their edit.
Just thought I'd throw it out there. No move needs to take place right now - having the COI edit notice was good for now.--CaroleHenson (talk) 20:18, 22 October 2016 (UTC)
- Well, based on how passionate some of the editors are on that page it seemed appropriate to make folks stop and think about the nature of their edits. Octoberwoodland (talk) 00:42, 23 October 2016 (UTC)
- Ah, thanks!--CaroleHenson (talk) 01:37, 23 October 2016 (UTC)
LDS
Hi. Just seen that you're LDS. I wouldn't mind creating more article about the church if you're interested.Zigzig20s (talk) 01:41, 23 October 2016 (UTC)
- I stay away from editing articles about the church -- it would be COI for me to edit those type of articles . Octoberwoodland (talk) 03:12, 23 October 2016 (UTC)
Category:Muslim Related Attacks has been nominated for discussion
![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/5/5f/Ambox_warning_orange.svg/48px-Ambox_warning_orange.svg.png)
Category:Muslim Related Attacks, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Adamtt9 (talk) 00:30, 29 November 2016 (UTC)