Jump to content

User talk:Zigzig20s: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
→‎Michèle Morgan: new section
Line 44: Line 44:


That was a really solid effort, sourcing the whole filmography nearly single-handedly. Well done. --[[User:Floquenbeam|Floquenbeam]] ([[User talk:Floquenbeam|talk]]) 22:29, 21 December 2016 (UTC)
That was a really solid effort, sourcing the whole filmography nearly single-handedly. Well done. --[[User:Floquenbeam|Floquenbeam]] ([[User talk:Floquenbeam|talk]]) 22:29, 21 December 2016 (UTC)
:Awesome work, and something I'll be using as an example of '''exactly what to do''' in these circumstances. My highest regards to you and your efforts, despite our disagreements. Thanks for your hard work. [[User:The Rambling Man|The Rambling Man]] ([[User talk:The Rambling Man|talk]]) 22:32, 21 December 2016 (UTC)

Revision as of 22:32, 21 December 2016


ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Zigzig20s. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ITN recognition for Rémy Pflimlin

On 6 December 2016, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Rémy Pflimlin, which you nominated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. The Rambling Man (talk) 11:18, 6 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Reference errors on 8 December

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:20, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You've got mail!

Hello, Zigzig20s. Please check your email; you've got mail! The subject is Oxford University Press - Journals Accounts.
Message added 00:46, 13 December 2016 (UTC). It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.

Please see the email for your log-in credentials for Oxford University Press - Journals Stream. --Cameron11598 (Talk) 00:46, 13 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Born and raised in the Kerem HaTeimanim (Yemenite Quarter) neighborhood of Tel Aviv as per this obituary in Haaretz, Yours, Quis separabit? 15:05, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

User:Rms125a@hotmail.com: Thanks. I suppose Haaretz is a better source than The Times of Israel. It is also corroborated by Israel Hayom. If we can find more about her career and expand the article, we may be able to take it to Recent Deaths on the main page.Zigzig20s (talk) 11:53, 15 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

That was a really solid effort, sourcing the whole filmography nearly single-handedly. Well done. --Floquenbeam (talk) 22:29, 21 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Awesome work, and something I'll be using as an example of exactly what to do in these circumstances. My highest regards to you and your efforts, despite our disagreements. Thanks for your hard work. The Rambling Man (talk) 22:32, 21 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]