Talk:First National Pictures: Difference between revisions
Notification of altered sources needing review #IABot (v1.2.7.1) |
→A Warner Bros. - First National Picture: new section |
||
Line 30: | Line 30: | ||
Cheers.—[[User:InternetArchiveBot|'''<span style="color:darkgrey;font-family:monospace">InternetArchiveBot</span>''']] <span style="color:green;font-family:Rockwell">([[User talk:InternetArchiveBot|Report bug]])</span> 04:33, 1 January 2017 (UTC) |
Cheers.—[[User:InternetArchiveBot|'''<span style="color:darkgrey;font-family:monospace">InternetArchiveBot</span>''']] <span style="color:green;font-family:Rockwell">([[User talk:InternetArchiveBot|Report bug]])</span> 04:33, 1 January 2017 (UTC) |
||
== A Warner Bros. - First National Picture == |
|||
I realize this is sited via the AFI (and who am I to argue with the AFI) but if you actually view the films, and I've viewed a lot of them, they didn't start using the trade name "A Warner Bros.-First National Picture" until 1940. From 1935 to 1939, films show "Warner Bros. Pictures, Inc. (and the Vitaphone Corp.) present... and then "A Warner Bros. Picture" or "A First National Picture" under the title and on the end title card. In 1934 and prior, the First National product only states First National with no mention of Warner Bros. at all. The most recent picture I've seen stating "A Warner Bros.-First National Picture" is 1964's "Dead Ringer". [[User:Rkolian|Rkolian]] ([[User talk:Rkolian|talk]]) 19:49, 2 March 2017 (UTC) |
Revision as of 19:49, 2 March 2017
Individuals with a conflict of interest, particularly those representing the subject of the article, are strongly advised not to directly edit the article. See Wikipedia:Conflict of interest. You may request corrections or suggest content here on the Talk page for independent editors to review, or contact us if the issue is urgent. |
Film: Filmmaking / American Start‑class | ||||||||||||||||
|
Companies Unassessed | |||||||||||||||||
|
Surviving films
An awful lot of the films listed in the article have been lost to time, including the company's first and last films - did Warner Brothers not preserve their archive, or did they not have an archive? 84.93.73.129 (talk) 18:01, 29 January 2016 (UTC)
- An article talk page is not the place for a general discussion of the topic. It's meant for discussions about improving the article. BMK (talk) 23:17, 29 January 2016 (UTC)
Please help build this article
Please help build this article. This is a noteworthy company seeing how they are the largest non-bank lender in Canada, especially with some growing interest and concern over mortgage and housing prices. I don't mean this article to sound like an advertisement, but I've started with some basic stats about the company's holding and I'd like it to become a better article, similar to another lending organization like Home Capital Group. Gentek16 (talk) 01:37, 1 July 2016 (UTC)
- This is article is about First National Pictures, an early Hollywood movie studio boought by Warner Bros. It is not about a bank. BMK (talk) 02:52, 1 July 2016 (UTC)
External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on First National Pictures. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160303225105/http://www.silentsaregolden.com/arnefirstnational.html to http://www.silentsaregolden.com/arnefirstnational.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:33, 1 January 2017 (UTC)
A Warner Bros. - First National Picture
I realize this is sited via the AFI (and who am I to argue with the AFI) but if you actually view the films, and I've viewed a lot of them, they didn't start using the trade name "A Warner Bros.-First National Picture" until 1940. From 1935 to 1939, films show "Warner Bros. Pictures, Inc. (and the Vitaphone Corp.) present... and then "A Warner Bros. Picture" or "A First National Picture" under the title and on the end title card. In 1934 and prior, the First National product only states First National with no mention of Warner Bros. at all. The most recent picture I've seen stating "A Warner Bros.-First National Picture" is 1964's "Dead Ringer". Rkolian (talk) 19:49, 2 March 2017 (UTC)
- Start-Class film articles
- Start-Class filmmaking articles
- Filmmaking task force articles
- Filmmaking articles needing an image
- Start-Class American cinema articles
- American cinema task force articles
- American cinema articles needing an image
- Film articles needing an image
- WikiProject Film articles
- Unassessed company articles
- Unknown-importance company articles
- WikiProject Companies articles