Jump to content

User talk:Seattle: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
SineBot (talk | contribs)
m Signing comment by Themom51 - ""
Line 40: Line 40:


Why did you nominate my Sasquatch photo for deletion? I live in Reedsport, Oregon and I took that photo with my own camera. Why in the world would you think there is a copyright problem with it? <!-- Template:Unsigned --><small class="autosigned">—&nbsp;Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Themom51|Themom51]] ([[User talk:Themom51#top|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Themom51|contribs]]) 02:56, 29 March 2017 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
Why did you nominate my Sasquatch photo for deletion? I live in Reedsport, Oregon and I took that photo with my own camera. Why in the world would you think there is a copyright problem with it? <!-- Template:Unsigned --><small class="autosigned">—&nbsp;Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Themom51|Themom51]] ([[User talk:Themom51#top|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Themom51|contribs]]) 02:56, 29 March 2017 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
:See [[c:Commons:Public art and copyrights in the US]]. [[User:Seattle|Seattle]] ([[User talk:Seattle#top|talk]]) 03:02, 29 March 2017 (UTC)

Revision as of 03:02, 29 March 2017

DYK for Faith Spotted Eagle

On 15 January 2017, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Faith Spotted Eagle, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Faith Spotted Eagle became the first Native American to receive a presidential electoral vote after Robert Satiacum Jr. cast a faithless vote for her during the 2016 United States election? You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Faith Spotted Eagle), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Schwede66 12:01, 15 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 17 January 2017

The Signpost: 6 February 2017

The Signpost: 27 February 2017

March 2017 WikiCup newsletter

And so ends the first round of the competition, with 4 points required to qualify for round 2. It would have been 5 points, but when a late entrant was permitted to join the contest in February, a promise was made that his inclusion would not result in the exclusion of any other competitor. To achieve this, the six entrants that had the lowest positive score of 4 points have been added to the 64 people who otherwise would have qualified. As a result, some of the groups have nine contestants rather than eight. Our top four scorers in round 1 were:

  • Scotland Cas Liber, last year's winner, led the field with two featured articles on birds and a total score of 674.
  • European Union Iry-Hor, a WikiCup newcomer, came next with a featured article, a good article and a tally of 282 bonus points for a score of 517. All these points came from the article Nyuserre Ini, an Ancient Egyptian pharaoh,
  • Japan 1989, another WikiCup newcomer, was in joint third place at 240. 1989 has claimed points for two featured lists and one good article relating to anime and comedy series, all of which were awarded bonus points.
  • South Australia Peacemaker67 shared third place with five good articles and thirteen good article reviews, mostly on naval vessels. He is also new to the competition.

The largest number of DYKs have been submitted by Vivvt and The C of E, who each claimed for seven, and MBlaze Lightning achieved eight articles at ITN. Carbrera and Peacemaker67 each claimed for five GAs and Krishna Chaitanya Velaga was well out in front for GARs, having reviewed 32. No featured pictures, featured topics or good topics yet, but we have achieved three featured articles and a splendid total of fifty good articles.

So, on to the second round. Remember that any content promoted after the end of round 1 but before the start of round 2 can be claimed in round 2. Invitations for collaborative writing efforts or any other discussion of potentially interesting work is always welcome on the WikiCup talk page. Remember, if two or more WikiCup competitors have done significant work on an article, all can claim points equally.

If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is a good article candidate, a featured process, or anything else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews. If you want to help out with the WikiCup, please do your bit to help keep down the review backlogs! Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Godot13, Sturmvogel 66 and Cwmhiraeth 13:52, 1 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Why did you nominate my Sasquatch photo for deletion? I live in Reedsport, Oregon and I took that photo with my own camera. Why in the world would you think there is a copyright problem with it? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Themom51 (talkcontribs) 02:56, 29 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

See c:Commons:Public art and copyrights in the US. Seattle (talk) 03:02, 29 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]