User talk:McCouchsky

Welcome!

Hello, McCouchsky, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

• Introduction and Getting started
• Contributing to Wikipedia
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page and How to develop articles
• How to create your first article
• Simplified Manual of Style

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or click here to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! —C.Fred (talk) 00:05, 28 March 2015 (UTC)

March 2015

Hello, I'm NeilN. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to 2 May 2014 Odessa clashes seemed less than neutral to me, so I removed it for now. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. NeilN ^{talk to me} 00:16, 28 March 2015 (UTC)

Your recent edits

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

1. Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
2. With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button ( or ) located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 00:48, 28 March 2015 (UTC)

March 2015

Your contribution so far makes an impression that you are not here to build an encyclopedia. Usually, such accounts get blocked very soon. If you want to avoid a block, would you please start making good contributions to the articles. The best is to stay away from contentious areas such as the conflict in Ukraine, where you may not have enough experience to contribute constructively. Thank you.--Ymblanter (talk) 07:32, 28 March 2015 (UTC)

HAH! Wiki is not a neutral site, so please don't suggest it is a real encyclopedia. There have been numerous studies finding just how big of a joke this site can be. You should not take your work so seriously as it's regarded as trash anyway. I see article after article being changed by senior editors to reflect certain political stances, a few examples I see is that they may be liberal leaning sometimes, or anti-russian...even in the face of evidence backed posts I see senior editors making changes that are truly reflective of the inherent biases of senior editors. I knew before coming here that this site is not a legitimate source for anything even half polticial. Everyone from academics, mainstream media, the internet commnity to people in general have made both public and privae claims, citing evidence, that this site is so politically biased that it should only be used for the most objective topics. You should be ashamed of yourself for trying to brainwash those that yet do not see that what you label as an encyopedia is a cleverly disguised tabloid. You're basically Alex Jones but at least he's transparent.

Here is an example. This is the type of source that wikipedia uses as an example of voter fraud in crimea: "Journalist voted at the Crimean referendum with Russian passport. Voting fraud. Scandal - YouTube". This is a legitimate source in wikiepdia? A source like this that would be pro russian would be deleted in seconds. It is a random man with a camera talking to a random woman, location unknown. — Preceding unsigned comment added by McCouchsky (talk • contribs)

Please stop attacking other editors, as you did on User talk:NeilN. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. —C.Fred (talk) 14:07, 28 March 2015 (UTC)

Who wants to edit a pseudo-encyclopedia run by politically motivated, biased, nobodies with fragile egos anyway?

If you continue attacking editors with personal insults, you will face a block. If you have specific suggestions on reliable sources that can be incorporated into a Wikipedia article, suggest them on the article talk page. If you want to rant about how terrible Wikipedia is, I'm sure you can find message boards where you'd be more at home. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 16:22, 28 March 2015 (UTC)

McCouchsky, you are invited to the Co-op!

Hi there! McCouchsky, you are invited to The Co-op, a gathering place for editors where you can find mentors to help you build and improve Wikipedia. If you're looking for an editor who can help you out, please join us! I JethroBT (I'm a Co-op mentor) This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 17:10, 28 March 2015 (UTC)

April 2017

Please do not add unreferenced or poorly referenced information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Wikipedia about living (or recently deceased) persons, as you did to Susan Rice. Thank you. NeilN ^{talk to me} 20:20, 3 April 2017 (UTC)

How to ban editors that are vandalizing wiki?

I have noticed that some editors such as NeilN have been vandalizing wiki by editing out unfavourable facts and sources about their political affiliation. I have followed their edits for 2 years now and have seen that they are comitting such vandalism so frequently that i question if they actually are here to help wiki or if they may be paid political activists. How to highlight this to senior admins to have them removed forever? McCouchsky (talk) 15:51, 4 April 2017 (UTC)