User talk:Quinton Feldberg

Hello, welcome to my talk page!

If you want to leave a message, please do it at the bottom, as a new section, for better formatting. You can do that by simply pressing the plus sign (+) or "new section" on the top of this page. And don't forget to sign your messages with four tildes, like this: ~~~~

Attention: I prefer to keep discussions unfragmented. If you leave a comment for me here, I will most likely respond to it on this same page—my talk page—as an effort to keep the entire conversation in one place. By the same token, if I leave a comment on your talk page, please respond to it there. Remember, we can use our watchlist to keep track of when responses are made. At the same time, feel free to send an alert to me on this page about a comment you have left elsewhere.

Thank you!

Joe Philbin - Nickname Edits Removed

Please can you explain why you will not allow the nicknames of Rugby League Player Joe Philbin to be added? A large amount of Rugby League players have nicknames included on their Wikipedia page, and I provided two references to support the use of these nicknames. One being his player profile on the official club website, the other being his own personal (verified) twitter account where he uses this nickname. We are attempting to make these changes as a friend of the person and do so in good faith and are (we believe to be) complying by wikipedia guidelines and referencing correctly. Please can you advise why these changes are being removed and perhaps help us to display them in a format supported and accepted by wikipedia? Thanks.

Jerzy

I made some changes to the article and you reverted them back. His first name is Jerzy not Jury. He is a member of the Marians of the Immaculate Conception, not the Marianists, a different community.

hello, it seems you undid my little edit.

just a word of advice. my IP is not static, you have no cookies on my system, and I am able to easily mask my IP in seconds. I also have alot of time on my hands so be a sport and leave it up for a day? thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.92.62.37 (talk) 23:43, 29 April 2017 (UTC)

as I said before

I'm not stopping, and your block is meaningless and will do nothing but buy you a few seconds before I do another edit. leave it for a day and let me have some fun with this and then you can change it back all you want — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.92.62.37 (talk) 23:47, 29 April 2017 (UTC)

Why you haras me ?

Why you haras me ? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rasalghoula (talk • contribs) 02:24, 30 April 2017 (UTC)

Arg - Bra football rivalry

Could you please bother checking the sources before accusing me of vandalism and threaten with blocks, please? Thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 190.177.82.236 (talk) 02:50, 30 April 2017 (UTC)

Jaime Cortez Edit

Hi Quinton,

Thank you for your input on the Jaime Cortez but I disagree that the information I provided was not constructive. I will be adding it back. I am working on this page for a class project and need to provide information on the context of the graphic novel, as well as its impact for it is one of the artist's most prominent work. I included my references in the original post.

Rosamorales.sf (talk) 03:00, 30 April 2017 (UTC)Rosa

Pending changes reviewer granted

Hello. Your account has been granted the "pending changes reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on pages protected by pending changes. The list of articles awaiting review is located at Special:PendingChanges, while the list of articles that have pending changes protection turned on is located at Special:StablePages.

Being granted reviewer rights neither grants you status nor changes how you can edit articles. If you do not want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time.

See also:

• Wikipedia:Reviewing pending changes, the guideline on reviewing
• Wikipedia:Pending changes, the summary of the use of pending changes
• Wikipedia:Protection policy#Pending changes protection, the policy determining which pages can be given pending changes protection by administrators. Lord Roem ~ (talk) 03:47, 30 April 2017 (UTC)

Wow! That was quick! Quinton Feldberg (talk) 03:48, 30 April 2017 (UTC)

Air Europa destinations

Why did you revert my edit? I readded the entry with a source because the previous edit was not sourced. 97.85.118.142 (talk) 04:14, 30 April 2017 (UTC)

Those edits are not constructive. I don't know why you keep deleting the entry. It has a reliable source. 97.85.118.142 (talk) 04:16, 30 April 2017 (UTC)

Sorry about that. You didn't indicate in the summary that you had added a source. I won't revert it anymore. Quinton Feldberg (talk) 04:18, 30 April 2017 (UTC)

Actually, in the first edit summary I stated "ref (short for reference) added". Should of said "source added" instead. 97.85.118.142 (talk) 04:20, 30 April 2017 (UTC)

Sorry I missed it. Quinton Feldberg (talk) 04:21, 30 April 2017 (UTC)

Recent reversions

You reverted my edits again at Lihue Airport and at Los Angeles Airport. I was adding a source to an unsourced edition. 97.85.118.142 (talk) 04:40, 30 April 2017 (UTC)

Sorry, again! Quinton Feldberg (talk) 04:42, 30 April 2017 (UTC)

A Barnstar for you!

	The Anti-Vandalism + STiki Barnstar
	Congratulations, Quinton Feldberg! You're receiving this barnstar because you recently crossed the 1,000 classification threshold using STiki. We thank you both for your contributions to Wikipedia at-large and your use of the tool. We hope you continue your ascent up the leaderboard and stay in touch at the talk page. Thank you and keep up the good work! West.andrew.g (developer) and Vanamonde (talk) 07:43, 30 April 2017 (UTC)

De la part de Mileva

Va te faire shampouiner abruti !!! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A01:E35:2EE2:9910:B47A:FAAD:5FB2:32A8 (talk) 17:43, 30 April 2017 (UTC)

Content on Angry Black woman page

Hi Quinton,

I received your message. My intention of editing this page is to provide additional historical and present context concerning the Angry Black woman myth. I have no issues with your change. Please let me know if you have any concerns.

Best, Ash

Clicked the wrong button. Quinton Feldberg (talk) 18:21, 30 April 2017 (UTC)

David Francis edit

I will said this only once do not make any changes again to David Francis Wikipedia page. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Gabrielvr22 (talk • contribs) 19:21, 30 April 2017 (UTC)

Draft:David Francis

Hello Quinton,

Can you explain why you reverted back so far erasing so much work? I see that you did some edits of other things on this page, which were helpful, but you took a big chunk of work out. This page is still in draft form and am getting the stuff up, then going back to edit the context and duplication of sections. If you would please explain more than it did not feel constructive, so I know what to fix that would be wonderful.

Thank you, Jeremy typo (talk) 19:23, 30 April 2017 (UTC)jeremy_typo

I have restored it! Quinton Feldberg (talk) 19:24, 30 April 2017 (UTC)

Thank you, Quinton! was this just a test? or was I doing something wrong? Jeremy typo (talk) 19:25, 30 April 2017 (UTC)jeremy_typo

I clicked the wrong button. Quinton Feldberg (talk) 19:33, 30 April 2017 (UTC)

ah ok, thank you, you had me worried lol Jeremy typo (talk) 19:38, 30 April 2017 (UTC)jeremy_typo

"Robbery laws in the United States" and Rollback

Hi there. I noticed your reverts on Robbery laws in the United States (currently a redirect) and wanted to let you know that this is a situation where rollback should not be used as its usage is contrary to our guidelines for utilizing the tool, to quote "[it is] considered inappropriate to use [rollback] in situations where an explanatory edit summary would normally be expected." In this case, a user unilaterally decided to redirect a new article without discussion and the article creator (who is a brand new editor) undid and continued to try and improve the article. As this is a content dispute and not simple vandalism, rollback is not the proper tool to utilize as advanced permissions should never be used for reverts other than pure vandalism, clearly disruptive conduct, own mistakes, etc. I know that when using Huggle it can be difficult to see the nuance but it is important you keep this in mind when doing anti-vandal work (especially when using semi-automated tools, for example Huggle reported the user to AIV for action after your reverts) as we want to be welcoming to new users and not scare them off. Please let me know if you have any questions. Best, Mifter (talk) 19:59, 30 April 2017 (UTC)

Understood. Quinton Feldberg (talk) 20:13, 30 April 2017 (UTC)

Full Service Network

Yes, you keep removing some of the additional services that were on the FSN, especially the sports items. These were ground breaking at the time, worthy of Sports Illustrated articles, and a precursor to today's tv applications. Please add the two sentences back in to the area under Pizza. If you want to keep the Full Service Network piece from Pittsburgh, that was added in at a much later date by the company in Pittsburgh, feel free, but they had nothing to do with the Time Warner FSN

Contributions restored! Quinton Feldberg (talk) 20:57, 30 April 2017 (UTC)

Vandal

I am not vandalizing. All the chinese symbols for numers redirect to the corresponding pages. I was just doing so with these symbols as well. Goveganplease (talk) 23:32, 30 April 2017 (UTC)

When reverting ClueBot NG, it's usually a good idea to explain why in the summary. I have restored your edit. Quinton Feldberg (talk) 23:36, 30 April 2017 (UTC)

Thank you very much. Sorry for any troubles. I am still learning :) Goveganplease (talk) 23:39, 30 April 2017 (UTC)

So is ClueBot NG. :D Quinton Feldberg (talk) 23:40, 30 April 2017 (UTC)

Jeffrey Garcia

I am trying to include unknown facts about Jeffrey Garcia to his Wikipedia page to help spread this knowledge. However, it is constantly being removed and has been claimed as vandalism. I am very offended. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Paco4nicholas (talk • contribs) 23:41, 30 April 2017 (UTC)

Looks like ClueBot NG made another mistake. Edit restored! Quinton Feldberg (talk) 23:44, 30 April 2017 (UTC)

Bryan Fuller

I have recently been restoring what I firmly believe to be wrongful deletions to the article; such as: the seemingly blatant removal of all mentioning of Star Trek: Discovery based solely on the fact that he had to leave due to other commitments. He is still forever credited as co-creator, exec producer, and writer; no reason for removal; period. Also, my deletions of multiple article links in the awards and nominations section seems to be an issue; although I can't see why that is a problem; common sense would indicate that we don't need multiple links to same article in one section, no? I truly apologize if I have enraged you for any reason, but I can't understand why this is such a problem. I have reached out to you using my actual account, so before you revert again, please message me to discuss this. If nothing else: keep ST: D in; please. - Cartoon Boy (talk) 04:10, 31 April 2017 (UTC)

You could at least look at the changes

Although I'll give you the benefit of the doubt that you mean well, with the speed of your reversion, it is apparent that you didn't even look at the changes I made to the Miranda article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:401:503:62B0:7006:C9EF:53AF:6BF0 (talk) 00:54, 2 May 2017 (UTC)

Notice

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is Quinton Feldberg bot editing to bully people. NeilN ^{talk to me} 01:16, 2 May 2017 (UTC)

Mistake

I think you made a mistake. I simply asked a question about the ability of ISIS to distinguish the Yazidi people from their own people. 50.4.236.254 (talk) 03:35, 2 May 2017 (UTC)

Which edit? Quinton Feldberg (talk) 03:36, 2 May 2017 (UTC)

 Restored! Quinton Feldberg (talk) 03:38, 2 May 2017 (UTC)

This is one of the reasons why wiki is pointless to edit and will never be considered a professional source

Users like you are the reason why nobody really cares about wikipedia anymore except people who obviously have no time on their hands but to harass and protest other users. What a shame. However, I didn't come here to discuss that. I came here to discuss your reversion of my edit.

My removal of currently outdated and self defeating information on the Hitman: Absolution article was completely valid and by all means allowed, and I will be removing it again.

Here is why: This quote --> "...Reilly Brennan, and studio head of IO Interactive, Hannes Seifert have confirmed that Hitman: Absolution will be coming to Xbox One via backwards compatibility. It is plan on making the game compatible but it's currently unclear when the game will be made compatible." "

is simply no longer CURRENT! The 360 version of the game IS WORKING on Xbox One as of TODAY. I own the game for gosh's sake!

I didn't even add any text, as the other half of the "Backwards Compatibility" section is VALID! Quote: "...On 14 February 2017, Hitman: Absolution was made available via Backwards Compatibility on Xbox One." is a correct statement! It even has a link for citation!

I did not remove that part of the article in malice. I did it because it is simply out of date information. It blatantly states this itself!

Consider what I have explained Mr. Quinton Feldber, if that is your real name... — Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.71.39.229 (talk) 21:35, 2 May 2017 (UTC)

Vandelism on WWII in Yugoslavia page

IP 178.222.116.11 continues to make tge same edits despite previous warning and now despite your warning. Person has gone through multiple IP adresses. A determined individual. What can be done to curb this behavior? 108.54.93.183 (talk) 22:55, 3 May 2017 (UTC)

Requesting page protection. Quinton Feldberg (talk) 22:56, 3 May 2017 (UTC)

Other IPs the person used were 178.233.44.231 and 93.86.83.158 for they appear one after the other due to blocks and edit the same pages using only mobile editor. Guy/Gal has touch free time for their own good. Sad such people exist here on Wikipedia. 108.54.93.183 (talk) 23:42, 3 May 2017 (UTC)

No contributions by 178.233.44.23. Quinton Feldberg (talk) 23:55, 3 May 2017 (UTC)

Contributions by 93.86.83.158 are similar to those of 178.222.116.11. Quinton Feldberg (talk) 23:58, 3 May 2017 (UTC)

you suck

yes you do.

--86.131.64.72 (talk) 11:56, 4 May 2017 (UTC)

its me back from last night you pay for your bother mark my word.