User talk:KylieTastic

It is approximately 2:18 AM where this user lives.

I try to answer all questions, but I also have a busy real-life and heath issues to deal with - If you have a general question it may be quicker to ask at the Wikipedia:Teahouse

Click to start a Question/section — Deleted image issue? Look up the files history here...

Request on 20:38:37, 1 April 2017 for assistance on AfC submission by Hadaryih16

• Hadaryih16 (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:Saudia Cargo (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Dear i have submitted my article 37 days ago after your rejection and i fixed everything as much as i understand. Since then the page has not been reviewed and i am being put in queue! When should i expect this to be done? i really need your help Thank you

Hadaryih16 (talk) 20:38, 1 April 2017 (UTC)

• Hi Hadaryih16 yes AfC appears to have gotten very backed-up with over 900 articles waiting and worse nearly 300 3 weeks old or worse. Unfortunately, I've not had the time for Wikipedia recently with work and health issues. Two places you could try asking for feedback would be the Wikipedia:Teahouse or Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk. Unfortunately this is the problem with volunteer systems. Sorry I can't be of more help. Cheers KylieTastic (talk) 10:40, 2 April 2017 (UTC)

Brie Bella

Brie Bella hasn't had her child yet. With you saying that she has means that she has had the child even though she hasn't. I've had to revert this edit a couple of times now. Plum3600 (talk) 14:57, 6 April 2017 (UTC)

• Hi Plum3600 I made no change relating to any child - I just reverted the vandalism to the image. KylieTastic (talk) 15:26, 6 April 2017 (UTC)

@KylieTastic: I apologise. I must have got confused. I was to tell this to the person who edited that bit. Again I apologise. Plum3600 (talk) 15:39, 6 April 2017 (UTC)

Cogra Moss

You are quite right about Cogra Moss, and I did not catch the fact that my tool was changing a file name, not a file caption.--Dthomsen8 (talk) 18:15, 6 April 2017 (UTC)

Migyur Dorje entry

Whoever wrote this entry is ignorant. If you look at the Tibetan Wylie transcript, it's mi-gyur, there's no N. It's ridiculous and misleading to add the N. You can see in references, the official biography of terton Migyur Dorje written by the keepers of the lineage. I have just discussed with Khenpo Sonam Tsewang, the writer, and he is absolutely clear on the spelling. What more can I do to prove this? I have also written to Rigpa Wiki, they might have caused this misunderstanding. Bugso (talk) 10:33, 10 April 2017 (UTC)

• Hi Bugso I would assume what has happened is the native name is "Mi'gyur" but it was romanised as Mingyur - Google Scholar links show 43 results for "Mingyur Dorje" and 20 for "Migyur Dorje". These types of issue are common hence we end up with a policy such as WP:COMMONNAME. Also there was no single person who wrote the article but a collaboration. It was originally created by User:ZuluPapa5 who did use "Migyur Dorje" the page was moved with this by CFynn with the comment "usual name". So maybe a good step would be to leave them a message. Cheers KylieTastic (talk) 11:20, 10 April 2017 (UTC)

A10 and sandboxes

Hi, just a note regarding this edit. You've done a good job of spotting that there already exists an article on this topic. However, the new article was a significantly expanded version, and when you tagged it per WP:A10 and it got deleted, the newly contributed content was lost. The optimal solution I guess would have been to move that back to the sandbox of the user who created it and to offer help in merging its content into the main article. I've dealt with that, so no further action is necessary now. Thanks! – Uanfala (talk) 12:09, 13 April 2017 (UTC)

Now I notice that you've been around for some time, so the above is probably nothing new to you. Sorry if that's the case. – Uanfala (talk) 12:10, 13 April 2017 (UTC)

• Hi Uanfala, I did notice after I tagged it that is was an expanded project and so I left a note on the talk page noting this and suggesting the deleting admin actually move back to the user area without a redirect - but I guess they didn't. I wish that it was the default for admins to think if rather then taking delete tags as literal they considered if moving back to either the users area or the draft area was more appropriate (obviously when not for copyright etc). I had meant to add an explantation on the users page to why it was tagged and how it should have been done but I got distracted as I was only doing a few edits between test runs at work. Thanks for sorting it out for them. Cheers KylieTastic (talk) 12:20, 13 April 2017 (UTC)

reverse

Hi I'm sorry for the reversal that I did, I wanted to reverse the vandalism and just new with the tool twinkle FranciscoMG (talk) 14:44, 13 April 2017 (UTC)

• Hi FranciscoMG there wasn't a problem with your revert other than it did not go back enough. Because I reverted back more it would have appeared like I was reverting you. If you get a notification that you've been reverted always check the history and in this case you would have seen my edit comment "Rvt more". Cheers KylieTastic (talk) 14:59, 13 April 2017 (UTC)

NPR

Thank you for patrolling new pages. I have completed the review task you began at Tziporela. Please ensure that reviews are complete and as accurate as possible. The current backlog stands at over 18,000 and unpatrolled, unsuitable new pages will be indexed by Google after only 90 days. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk)

About becoming an administrator

Wikipedia needs you! Take the poll.

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia so far; they are very much appreciated. Your experience and tenure have been an asset to the project.

Have you ever thought of becoming an administrator? It can be enjoyable, challenging, and a great way to help Wikipedia.

If you would like to find out about your chances of a successful RfA, please visit:

Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Optional RfA candidate poll

Thank you!

Anna Frodesiak (talk) 23:38, 14 April 2017 (UTC)

• Hi Anna Frodesiak thanks for the thought but I've seen enough of the RfAs to know they can be quite hostile and Civility can go out of the window. Also I know a large number consider article creation (and GA) a huge deal and I have created none. I've never been quite sure why creation is such a big deal for some over protecting and improving the 5+ million existing articles we have. I thought I would be creating some when I started but I've not found much in the many areas that interest me that do not already exist, and the vandalism and new user engagement always keeps me too busy to work on new fringe articles. So thanks, but I think I'll skip playing the admin Piñata game, at least at this time. Cheers KylieTastic (talk) 11:40, 15 April 2017 (UTC)

Hi Kylie. People bugged me for ages to run. I thought the same as you. There was no poll around at the time either. I was terrified, for nothing it turned out. I was pleasantly surprised. I had, and still have, no GA anything and was weak in a number of areas. You are not. You are good everywhere and a better editor than me. Plus, the last admin to pass did so in the sixty percentish area. You may be up in the 90% support area.

So, why not take the poll? It's only a poll, and I know you are brave enough for that. See what others say. A bit of critique is good for us. It makes us stronger. And it makes the unknown known. That is good. And at an actual RfA, you just answer the questions KylieTastically, something you could do easily. Ignore opposers. Let the chips fall as they may. Then, well, think of yourself as an admin. I think you'd like it. Best, Anna Frodesiak (talk) 20:54, 15 April 2017 (UTC)

Courtesy notification.

Because you have been involved in related discussions, I am noting that I have recently nominated the article K.T. Reeder for deletion. Thank you. Eggishorn (talk) (contrib) 14:22, 25 April 2017 (UTC)

Jeong Mong-ju (with "-") and not Jeong Mongju.

Hello KylieTastic. Yes, you made a mistake and I see that you don't understand it. Please don't correct that "-" again and again, and let Jeong Mong-ju and not Jeong Mongju.

I don't need to provide a reliable source as you asked, as long as, all Korean names from Wikipedia, media, television, etc., are transliterated with "-". Even those old Korean names from Jeong Mong-ju's time use "-". It's enough that in the past I spent time, bringing some informations to "Jeong Mong-ju" article, without to delete anything.

So, if you want to correct again and again "Jeong Mong-ju", then why don't you start to correct the entire Korean names on Wikipedia (in every language, not just in English), on internet or from the entire real world. Why not? Look, here you have a list about "Korea Power Celebrity". Start with them all, and cut/ delete every single "-" you see in their names. Why not??? Lol - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Forbes_Korea_Power_Celebrity .

Maybe tomorrow you'll say it's not "Jeong" but "Jeung"...! and maybe, you "are not currently busy with work and other real-life matters" as you say, as long as, you have time to correct a small and insignificant "-" from a Korean name, which, in fact, will not change anything. And... don't forget: I'm sure you are not a Korean, to know the whole linguistic rules of Korean language, philology and history (historical names). So, you have no kind of authority or academic authority to delete even a single "-" in any Korean name! Ok? Like me, you are just an user from internet - nothing more, (even though, you are authentified and I'm not). But, if you are an authority (a Korean scholar in Korean literature and/ or history), then use your real name and not "KylieTastic". Hope you are not ashamed with your own/ real name!

So, please let the article about Jeong Mong-ju, with "-"! If you'll continue to correct it, I won't make any change again and again, but I won't use or respect your wrong transliteration as it is (without "-"), because... it's clear that you don't speak or understand Korean language.

Regards! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 95.77.154.17 (talk) 00:44, 14 May 2017 (UTC)

Jeong Mong-ju (with "-") and not Jeong Mongju. (no. 2)

So, you need reliable sources!?! Ok! Then, see all these very reliable sources about Jeong Mong-ju (and not Jeong Mongju):

1. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nzWcpmqaX2E (00:39, 01:45, 02:15, 02:45, etc.) Arirang is a Korean television and knows how to transliterate Korean names. - so, it’s an authority! Jeong Mong-ju’s is with “-”.

2. Two sites - a Korean book of history, written by a Korean author: Kang Jae-eun. Even his name is with “-”: See pages 257, 258, etc. - where Jeong Mong-ju’s name has “-”. Also, you’ll see that all Korean names have “-”! See also the book cover with author’s name: Kang Jae-eun. https://books.google.ro/books?id=XB4UYXNQK1wC&pg=PA257&lpg=PA257&dq=Jeong+Mong-ju+in+korean+sites&source=bl&ots=8Ze1Rjcm68&sig=a4T54qXOQ_XEbBkVAtmBcr_mSNw&hl=ro&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwjJponbme7TAhUEG5oKHeozCQUQ6AEIZjAJ#v=onepage&q=Jeong%20Mong-ju%20in%20korean%20sites&f=false and http://www.homabooks.com/general/books/east_asia/korea/1045.php

3. The site of the National Museum of Korea - a very reliable source about Jeong Mong-ju. Here: https://www.museum.go.kr/site/eng/relic/represent/view?relicId=493 , here https://www.museum.go.kr/site/eng/relic/represent/view?relicId=2938 , here https://www.museum.go.kr/site/eng/relic/represent/view?relicId=2707 ,

4. For Korean names, see: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Korean_given_names . Almost all Korean names have “-”.

5. For other Korean names, see: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-PdWDpqQNTg 00:44 and 01:10 for Moon Jae-in, 01:36 for Yim Dong-wook, 01:48 for Kim Ji-yeon. So, all Korean names have “-”.

6. On Jeong Mong-ju (with “-”) - see the site of Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Republic of Korea: http://overseas.mofa.go.kr/webmodule/htsboard/template/read/legengreadboard.jsp?typeID=16&boardid=9625&seqno=708199&c=&t=&pagenum=1&tableName=TYPE_ENGLEGATIO&pc=&dc=&wc=&lu=&vu=&iu=&du=

7. On Jeong Mong-ju (with “-“), see the book: https://www.morebooks.de/gb/search?page=2&q=Goryeo&search_term=Goryeo&via_keyword=1

8. Harvard University: see pages 38 and 39 on Jeong Mong-ju (written “Chong Mong-ju”), with “-”: http://isites.harvard.edu/fs/docs/icb.topic787489.files/Early%20Korean%20Lit%203%20-%20Choson.pdf

Now, I hope you have here enough reliable sources, to correct your “Jong Mongju” article on Wikipedia.org - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jeong_Mongju ; also change the article name again in Jeong Mong-ju (with "-") (as it was once) and not Jeong Mongju (as it’s now). And next time, when you want to correct someone (whom you don’t know as academic background and high-level of knowledge and understanding), first of all, go and instruct yourself before to correct others! Ok? I DON’T accept (your) superficiality!!! If you are a "recent changes patroller" as you say ( https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:KylieTastic ), then, I start to have doubts about Wikipedia's accuracy, in every matter.

I talked thus with you - I mean, not very polite or pleasant - (this is not my style), because you corrected me twice WRONGLY/ UNJUSTLY, without any right and without to be a connoisseur/ expert of the Korean language! Moreover, Wikipedia.org is not your site (your property), but a public site/ domain (which should provide accurate informations), and before to make corrections, even you (the authentified user) go and inform yourself, even about a "." or a ",".

Regards!

PS: You can delete my two posts/ commentaries from here, whether you'll change "Jeong Mongju" with "Jeong Mong-ju" or not. I really don't care anymore!