Jump to content

Talk:London South Bank University: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Line 80: Line 80:


Cheers.—[[User:InternetArchiveBot|'''<span style="color:darkgrey;font-family:monospace">InternetArchiveBot</span>''']] <span style="color:green;font-family:Rockwell">([[User talk:InternetArchiveBot|Report bug]])</span> 13:16, 25 May 2017 (UTC)
Cheers.—[[User:InternetArchiveBot|'''<span style="color:darkgrey;font-family:monospace">InternetArchiveBot</span>''']] <span style="color:green;font-family:Rockwell">([[User talk:InternetArchiveBot|Report bug]])</span> 13:16, 25 May 2017 (UTC)

== Updates and corrections ==

In ranking and reputations text, the Guardian rankings are out of date. LSBU is now ranked 92 of 121. Can someone please update this?
Some other links of interest:
https://www.lawgazette.co.uk/law/russell-group-elite-tumble-in-top-law-school-rankings/5061137.article
http://www.theconstructionindex.co.uk/news/view/south-bank-uni-scraps-big-plans
http://feweek.co.uk/2017/06/06/desperate-college-seeks-university-take-over-before-merger-consultation-even-begins/
Current VC is also chair of Million Plus group, which LSBU is part of: http://www.millionplus.ac.uk/who-we-are/governance
Logos are also out of date.
Due to COI hoping someone else can take the facts from these and update accordingly. [[User:LSBUStephMasters|LSBUStephMasters]] ([[User talk:LSBUStephMasters|talk]]) 13:44, 19 June 2017 (UTC)

Revision as of 13:44, 19 June 2017

WikiProject iconHigher education Start‑class
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Higher education, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of higher education, universities, and colleges on Wikipedia. Please visit the project page to join the discussion, and see the project's article guideline for useful advice.
StartThis article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
WikiProject iconLondon Start‑class Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject London, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of London on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
StartThis article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Stuff that needs to be added to the table

Have added the LSBU logo to the page. If you find (or know) any of the information set out in the university template, please add the info to this page or the table itself.--Dab182 15:27, 10 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

University ratings

(I'm posting this to all articles on UK universities as so far discussion hasn't really taken off on Wikipedia:WikiProject Universities.)

There needs to be a broader convention about which university rankings to include in articles. Currently it seems most pages are listing primarily those that show the institution at its best (or worst in a few cases). See Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Universities#University ratings. Timrollpickering 23:53, 21 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Category for students and alumni on Wikipedia

Category:Wikipedians by alma mater: London South Bank University has been created for all current LSBU students and alumni editing Wikipedia. MRSCTalk 11:46, 28 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Distance

I've removed the lie that it is 5 minutes away from the South Bank. This article is full of spin which needs dealing with. Secretlondon (talk) 21:45, 17 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Reputation and ranking of LSBU

LSBU is notable for consistently placing near the bottom of university league tables, whether they are constructed on the basis of teaching, graduate employment or other bases. I inserted a paragraph referencing this, and it was deleted on grounds of "bias". Not clear to me why this is the case, but would welcome others' comments.LeContexte (talk) 22:33, 17 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The problem is that your edit is solely intended to deteriorate the reputation of the university. You just brought some rankings to make the university look bad. Wikipedia is not a place to deteriorate something. And your refs are not properly done. Please learn how to ref correctly.Wikipedian05 (talk) 00:22, 18 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You seem to be assuming my bad faith. If you think these are an unrepresentative selection of rankings and there are others which present a different impression, then please add them. If, on the other hand, you think it is inappropriate to note LSBU's consistently terrible rankings then you need to explain why, because this isn't at all clear to me. They meet all the usual requirements for relevance and reliability of sources. Very happy to accept help from people who are better than me at wiki. 08:27, 18 July 2010 (UTC)

Have added the available Institution rankings, and in the format found on the majority of the other UK University pages, this should hopefully resolve your biased / selective statistics argument. 83.104.51.74 (talk) 17:06, 12 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Basketball team

The following text was deleted from Diego Prado Jaramillo and placed here if someone determines it is notable to include in this article:

In 2008 the LSBU team were invited to Kingston Jamaica to attend the Utech Inaugural Basketball Classic tournament accompanied by their coach, Steve Alexander. The four team tournament, which also included GC Foster, University of the West Indies (UWI) and hosts University of Technolody (Utech) went on for battle on the 27–30 November. LSBU went into the tournament with an impressive record, having won the United Kingdom university championship and representing the country at the European Basketball Championships.

http://www.jamaica-gleaner.com/gleaner/20081125/sports/sports5.html

File:Phil Spencer Oxford 2008.jpg Nominated for speedy Deletion

An image used in this article, File:Phil Spencer Oxford 2008.jpg, has been nominated for speedy deletion for the following reason: All Wikipedia files with unknown copyright status

What should I do?

Don't panic; you should have time to contest the deletion (although please review deletion guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.

  • If the image is non-free then you may need to provide a fair use rationale
  • If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale, then it cannot be uploaded or used.
  • If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Deletion Review

To take part in any discussion, or to review a more detailed deletion rationale please visit the relevant image page (File:Phil Spencer Oxford 2008.jpg)

This is Bot placed notification, another user has nominated/tagged the image --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 00:41, 20 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 2 external links on London South Bank University. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers. —cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 19:27, 18 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on London South Bank University. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

checkY An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:16, 25 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Updates and corrections

In ranking and reputations text, the Guardian rankings are out of date. LSBU is now ranked 92 of 121. Can someone please update this? Some other links of interest: https://www.lawgazette.co.uk/law/russell-group-elite-tumble-in-top-law-school-rankings/5061137.article http://www.theconstructionindex.co.uk/news/view/south-bank-uni-scraps-big-plans http://feweek.co.uk/2017/06/06/desperate-college-seeks-university-take-over-before-merger-consultation-even-begins/ Current VC is also chair of Million Plus group, which LSBU is part of: http://www.millionplus.ac.uk/who-we-are/governance Logos are also out of date. Due to COI hoping someone else can take the facts from these and update accordingly. LSBUStephMasters (talk) 13:44, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]