Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Raina Hein: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
→Raina Hein: redirect |
|||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
:<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This debate has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Fashion|list of Fashion-related deletion discussions]]. [[User:Shawn in Montreal|Shawn in Montreal]] ([[User talk:Shawn in Montreal|talk]]) 22:33, 23 July 2017 (UTC)</small> |
:<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This debate has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Fashion|list of Fashion-related deletion discussions]]. [[User:Shawn in Montreal|Shawn in Montreal]] ([[User talk:Shawn in Montreal|talk]]) 22:33, 23 July 2017 (UTC)</small> |
||
*'''Delete'''. Being the runner-up in a reality show is not an automatic inclusion freebie that exempts a person from having to have enough [[WP:RS|reliable source]] coverage in real media to clear [[WP:GNG]] — but the only thing here that isn't a [[WP:PRIMARYSOURCES|primary source]] is still an ''invalid'' source, because it's a [[WordPress]] blog and those don't count for squat either. And while I'll grant that it's not blatant enough to trigger my speedy deletion reflex, there is a not insignificant [[WP:NOTADVERT|advertorial]] spin present here too. [[User:Bearcat|Bearcat]] ([[User talk:Bearcat|talk]]) 02:55, 24 July 2017 (UTC) |
*'''Delete'''. Being the runner-up in a reality show is not an automatic inclusion freebie that exempts a person from having to have enough [[WP:RS|reliable source]] coverage in real media to clear [[WP:GNG]] — but the only thing here that isn't a [[WP:PRIMARYSOURCES|primary source]] is still an ''invalid'' source, because it's a [[WordPress]] blog and those don't count for squat either. And while I'll grant that it's not blatant enough to trigger my speedy deletion reflex, there is a not insignificant [[WP:NOTADVERT|advertorial]] spin present here too. [[User:Bearcat|Bearcat]] ([[User talk:Bearcat|talk]]) 02:55, 24 July 2017 (UTC) |
||
*'''Redirect''' to [[America's Next Top Model (cycle 14)]] per [[WP:ATD-R]]. Plausible search term even if not notable enough for a stand-alone article. Should have been redirected by the nominator per [[WP:BEFORE]] C.4 instead of bringing it here. Regards '''[[User:SoWhy|<span style="color: #7A2F2F; font-variant:small-caps">So</span>]][[User talk:SoWhy|<span style="color: #474F84; font-variant:small-caps">Why</span>]]''' 07:36, 31 July 2017 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 07:36, 31 July 2017
- Raina Hein (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non-notable person. All sources are primary. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 14:21, 23 July 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 15:11, 23 July 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Minnesota-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 15:12, 23 July 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 22:33, 23 July 2017 (UTC)
- Delete. Being the runner-up in a reality show is not an automatic inclusion freebie that exempts a person from having to have enough reliable source coverage in real media to clear WP:GNG — but the only thing here that isn't a primary source is still an invalid source, because it's a WordPress blog and those don't count for squat either. And while I'll grant that it's not blatant enough to trigger my speedy deletion reflex, there is a not insignificant advertorial spin present here too. Bearcat (talk) 02:55, 24 July 2017 (UTC)
- Redirect to America's Next Top Model (cycle 14) per WP:ATD-R. Plausible search term even if not notable enough for a stand-alone article. Should have been redirected by the nominator per WP:BEFORE C.4 instead of bringing it here. Regards SoWhy 07:36, 31 July 2017 (UTC)