Jump to content

User talk:Davidbmuller: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Line 102: Line 102:
This article is currently inaccurate in saying that the Green Sports Alliance got started by team owners. The founding members were all represented by members of the teams' venue operations groups, and owners were not involved beyond granting approval. It also omits the NRDC's role (Hershkowitz, specifically) in convening the people and contributing foundational funding for the organization to get off the ground. This is what the 'About' section of the Green Sports Alliance's website reads: 'The Green Sports Alliance was conceived and founded by the Seattle Seahawks, Portland Trail Blazers, Seattle Sounders FC, Seattle Mariners, Seattle Storm, Vancouver Canucks and the Natural Resources Defense Council' (http://greensportsalliance.org/about/). Here are a couple of other reputable sources supporting the edit I am requesting: https://www.forbes.com/sites/csr/2011/03/24/the-green-league-csr-hits-pro-sports/#1110d9a51e42; https://www.greenbiz.com/news/2011/07/14/red-sox-chiefs-among-20-pro-teams-joining-green-sports-alliance; http://seattle.mariners.mlb.com/news/press_releases/press_release.jsp?ymd=20110321&content_id=17053284&vkey=pr_sea&fext=.jsp&c_id=sea
This article is currently inaccurate in saying that the Green Sports Alliance got started by team owners. The founding members were all represented by members of the teams' venue operations groups, and owners were not involved beyond granting approval. It also omits the NRDC's role (Hershkowitz, specifically) in convening the people and contributing foundational funding for the organization to get off the ground. This is what the 'About' section of the Green Sports Alliance's website reads: 'The Green Sports Alliance was conceived and founded by the Seattle Seahawks, Portland Trail Blazers, Seattle Sounders FC, Seattle Mariners, Seattle Storm, Vancouver Canucks and the Natural Resources Defense Council' (http://greensportsalliance.org/about/). Here are a couple of other reputable sources supporting the edit I am requesting: https://www.forbes.com/sites/csr/2011/03/24/the-green-league-csr-hits-pro-sports/#1110d9a51e42; https://www.greenbiz.com/news/2011/07/14/red-sox-chiefs-among-20-pro-teams-joining-green-sports-alliance; http://seattle.mariners.mlb.com/news/press_releases/press_release.jsp?ymd=20110321&content_id=17053284&vkey=pr_sea&fext=.jsp&c_id=sea
[[User:Davidbmuller|Davidbmuller]] ([[User talk:Davidbmuller#top|talk]]) 21:51, 28 August 2017 (UTC)
[[User:Davidbmuller|Davidbmuller]] ([[User talk:Davidbmuller#top|talk]]) 21:51, 28 August 2017 (UTC)

I would also like to add the following publications to the list in this article:

Bronx Ecology: Blueprint for a New Environmentalism in my publications? It was published by Island Press in 2002, and reviewed by the New York Times.<ref>http://www.nytimes.com/2003/08/17/books/green-rocky-road.html</ref>

"How Garbage Could Meet its Maker", The Atlantic Monthly, June 1993, pp. 108-109. <ref>http://www.unz.org/Pub/AtlanticMonthly-1993jun-00108</ref>
[[User:Davidbmuller|Davidbmuller]] ([[User talk:Davidbmuller#top|talk]]) 21:59, 28 August 2017 (UTC)

Revision as of 21:59, 28 August 2017

Welcome!

Hello, Davidbmuller, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit The Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! Safiel (talk) 21:54, 6 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File Copyright problem
File Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading File:Allen Speech StplesCtrAlGore.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status and its source. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously.

If you did not create this work entirely yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. You will also need to state under what licensing terms it was released. Please refer to the image use policy to learn what files you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. The page on copyright tags may help you to find the correct tag to use for your file.

Please add this information by editing the image description page. If the necessary information is not added within the next seven days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please also check any other files you may have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Safiel (talk) 21:52, 6 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on File:Allen Speech StplesCtrAlGore.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the file appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted content borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Safiel (talk) 22:01, 6 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon Hello, Davidbmuller. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places, or things you have written about in the article Allen Hershkowitz, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a COI may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic, and it is important when editing Wikipedia articles that such connections be completely transparent. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. In particular, we ask that you please:

  • avoid editing or creating articles related to you and your family, friends, school, company, club, or organization, as well as any competing companies' projects or products;
  • instead, you are encouraged to propose changes on the Talk pages of affected article(s) (see the {{request edit}} template);
  • when discussing affected articles, disclose your COI (see WP:DISCLOSE);
  • avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or to the website of your organization in other articles (see WP:SPAM);
  • exercise great caution so that you do not violate Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).

Please take a few moments to read and review Wikipedia's policies regarding conflicts of interest, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, sourcing and autobiographies. Thank you. Rentier (talk) 19:17, 26 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

COI

Hello, I am trying to resolve the issues on Allen Hershkowitz's wikipedia page related to my edits. I am not a well-versed used of Wikipedia, but I absolutely wish to adhere to all guidelines. I am more than willing to disclose the nature of my relationship to Mr. Hershkowitz, and to 'suggest edits' if need be as a result of my past professional relationship with him. I have not knowingly entered any false and/or unverifiable information in my edits; he asked for my help in updating his page with new information because he did not know how to accomplish that otherwise. Any errors I made were a result of a lack of proficiency in using wikipedia properly. I greatly appreciate and respect wikipedia's rules, so I will also greatly appreciate your help in resolving these issues with my contributions to this page and therefore removing the alerts currently at the top of the page.

Thanks very much, David MullerDavidbmuller (talk) 18:53, 26 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello there. This didn't require admin help, but since I am here anyway I declared conflict of interest for you. The community is bound to assume good faith but your transparency is much appreciated. If you would like to make changes to Allen Hershkowitz, please go to Talk:Allen Hershkowitz and follow the instructions here. Alex ShihTalk 04:22, 27 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for the disclosure. I'm asking Wikipedia:Conflict of interest/Noticeboard to have a look at prior and extensive edits on the article. ☆ Bri (talk) 15:10, 27 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • David would you please clarify if you are being paid, or expect to be paid, for your work for Hershkowitz? Please be aware that you must disclose this, if it is the case, per the Wikipedia policy, WP:PAID. You can reply here, just below this. Thanks Jytdog (talk) 17:44, 24 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • No, I am not being paid. I formerly worked with Dr. Hershkowitz (until May 2016) and I want to update his page to include more details on his career, because I admire his real world accomplishments and want that information to be available to the public. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.20.21.137 (talk) 18:12, 24 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
OK, thanks for answering. So your COI is just plain old COI by association. Thanks for clarifying. I have replied to your content proposal on the talk page, and have worked over the article some. Jytdog (talk) 19:43, 24 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I've went over the article and addressed the previous concerns. If you would like to suggest any content to be restored, or if you have any questions/suggestions, please {{request edit}} on the talk page. Here are some useful read from what I have found, please also take a look.

MOS:DOCTOR: Academic and professional titles (such as "Doctor" or "Professor") should not be used.

Regards, Alex ShihTalk 01:46, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello David, File:Allen Hershkowitz Headshot.jpg needs to have a copyright tag before you can use it in the article, or it will be automatically removed anyways. Alex ShihTalk 17:17, 10 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
I have moved the request edit to the article talk page. I am afraid majority of the these information will probably not be accepted based on the reason I have stated above. Alex ShihTalk 07:47, 24 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File at the commons

The image you uploaded at the commons has been tagged for not having appropriate copyright release. There are instructions there about what you should do. (namely, you should have the photographer email the address given in the notice, and provide the release) Jytdog (talk) 22:35, 25 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for clarifying--the author should be sending in his release directly to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org very soon.

SOCKing

Please stop directly editing the Hershkowitz article while logged out. Please stop directly editing it at all. Read WP:SOCK. If you continue to do that you will end up indefinitely blocked. Jytdog (talk) 19:15, 28 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

My apologies, I didn't realize I wasn't logged in when I started editing, but thought it would automatically be attributed to me when I submitted. This was in no way "socking"--my edits are intended to be transparent, and are 100% accurate. Again, I am not well-versed on Wikipedia editing, and find it very confusing and non-user-friendly as someone who is not a coder. But you're saying I should propose any and all future changes in the talk page rather than directly editing? Is this due to my past association with Hershkowitz?
Above you agreed to follow the COI guideline. If you read the COI guideline, it explains that you should not edit directly, but should only propose content on the talk page. if there is something unclear about that, please let me know and I can explain. Jytdog (talk) 19:58, 28 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

New edit at Hershkowitz

About this, some logistical issues:

  • Please do not change content on a Talk page that has already been responded to. Never do that. Please read WP:TPG
  • Please post requests in new sections.
  • Please sign your posts.

About the content you proposed:

  • The content about Hershkowitz was completely unsupported by the 2 sources cited. Please do not waste our time with proposals that are not supported by high quality, independent sourcing.
  • The language you used there, "with material and logistical support from the NRDC" is rather putrid PR language. That is not encyclopedic content meant to teach anybody anything.
  • I noted above that every time you edit, you agree to follow community policies and guidelines - this is the responsibility that comes with your editing privileges.
  • If you continue to propose content advocating for Hershkowtiz that violates our content policies, then your editing privileges will likely be restricted. The mission and policies and guidelines of Wikipedia need to come first, not your advocacy for Hershkowitz. Please keep that in mind. Thanks. Jytdog (talk) 19:55, 28 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This article is currently inaccurate in saying that the Green Sports Alliance got started by team owners. The founding members were all represented by members of the teams' venue operations groups, and owners were not involved beyond granting approval. It also omits the NRDC's role (Hershkowitz, specifically) in convening the people and contributing foundational funding for the organization to get off the ground. This is what the 'About' section of the Green Sports Alliance's website reads: 'The Green Sports Alliance was conceived and founded by the Seattle Seahawks, Portland Trail Blazers, Seattle Sounders FC, Seattle Mariners, Seattle Storm, Vancouver Canucks and the Natural Resources Defense Council' (http://greensportsalliance.org/about/). Here are a couple of other reputable sources supporting the edit I am requesting: https://www.forbes.com/sites/csr/2011/03/24/the-green-league-csr-hits-pro-sports/#1110d9a51e42; https://www.greenbiz.com/news/2011/07/14/red-sox-chiefs-among-20-pro-teams-joining-green-sports-alliance; http://seattle.mariners.mlb.com/news/press_releases/press_release.jsp?ymd=20110321&content_id=17053284&vkey=pr_sea&fext=.jsp&c_id=sea Davidbmuller (talk) 21:51, 28 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I would also like to add the following publications to the list in this article:

Bronx Ecology: Blueprint for a New Environmentalism in my publications? It was published by Island Press in 2002, and reviewed by the New York Times.[1]

"How Garbage Could Meet its Maker", The Atlantic Monthly, June 1993, pp. 108-109. [2] Davidbmuller (talk) 21:59, 28 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]