Talk:Suryavansha

Suryavanshi castes

They are not discussed.--Redtigerxyz 15:52, 11 November 2007 (UTC) I think that lord RAM was a SURYAVANSHI.As the saying for him goes like"RAGHUKUL REETI SADA CHALI AAYI, PRAAN JAYE PAR VACHAN NA JAYE",which means RAM was a raghuvanshi not a Suryavanshi. Please confirm it and then tell me about it.My email id is suryavanshi_prince19@yahoo.co.in —Preceding unsigned comment added by 124.124.205.10 (talk) 15:33, 24 February 2009 (UTC)

---

My dear friend Suryavansha and Raghuvansha are same.Because Surya or Vivaswan was the first person of this dynasty therefore his dynasty was called Suryavansha.Later in the same dynasty many important kings were born like Ikshwaku, Kakuthstha,Harishchandra,Dileepa,Bhagiratha,Sagara,Raghu,Dasharatha,Rama,etc.Because Raghu was very important king, his dynasty was known after him.Thus Raghu himself was a Suryavanshi and his sons and grandsons were Suryavanshi and Raghuvanshi also.But his father and grand father were Suryavanshi only and not Raghuvanshi.Raghuvansha started after him and bearing his name.

--Let there be light 13:25, 8 May 2009 (UTC)

ABOUT CHANDRAVANSHI'S

Hi Dear All,

It is confirmed that we belongs to Chandravanshi's and Chandel are a part of Chandravansham. Also I would like to add more informations here that Chandravanshi's are known as Gwala/Gadaria/Shephereds. Because Lord Krishna was the shephereds. And we are all knwon as Gwala/Shephereds/Ahirs and very commonly known as Dhangars / Neekhars.

Earlier peoples known and recognised by their linage like Suryavanshi's, Chandravanshi's, Agnivanshi's but later on they adopted the name as Rajputs.

Originally we are SHEPHEREDS / GWALA known as (Chandravanshi' or Somavanshi's and in some part of country knwon as (Yaduvanshi's a part of Chandravanshi's). As regards to Gotra's - Chandel is a main gotra and again it is further divied into sub gotras e.g. Chandiya Chandel, Rahiya Chandel, Guiya Chandel, Mankiwale Chandel, Basedewale Chandel and Chandrayan.

A large part of Chandels are in PAL COMMUNITY which is known as PAL KSHATRIYA / PAL SHEPHEREDS.

We all have to project ourselves as CHANDRAVANSHI'S ...

MAIN STARS OF CHANDRAVANSHI'S OR GWALA-SHEPHEREDS ;

1) SHEPHERED SAMRAT - BHARAT 2) " " - LORD KRISHNA 2) " " - MAHARAJA YASHWANT RAO HOLKAR 3) " " - DEVI AHILYA BAI HOLKAR 4) " " - POET KALIDAS 5) " " - SANT KANAKDAS 6) " " - CHANDRAGUPT MOURYA 7) " " - SAMRAT ASHOK

Many more stars in Chandravansham. For more detail see the wikipedia.org (DHANGAR COLOUM) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Lakhmi (talk • contribs) 04:49, 8 November 2008 (UTC)

Raghu-vamsa is another term for the family/people deriving from sungod. Raghuvamsa. Rama, whe He appeared, it was in Raghuvamsa.

Austerlitz -- 88.72.28.199 (talk) 02:09, 16 March 2009 (UTC)

Title

"Suryavanshi" is the name describing someone from the dynasty, while "Suryavansha" describes the dynasty itself. For this article, it would be more appropriate to use the dynasty name as the article title. I propose a redirect. --Shruti14 ^{talk • sign} 20:30, 16 April 2009 (UTC)

---

Yes I agree with Shruti14.The title must be Suryavansha".Originally it was "Sun Dynasty", which means "Suryavansha" in Sanskrit and Hindi.So I am trying to change the title.But I presume it is hard to change title.

--Let there be light 12:56, 1 May 2009 (UTC)

Merge- Suryavanshi into Suryavansha, valid reasons given above! --Ekabhishek (talk) 12:49, 1 May 2009 (UTC)

 Done Thanks. --Shruti14 ^{talk • sign} 02:35, 4 May 2009 (UTC)

The problem with moving the page was that Suryavansha already existed as a redirect page, and Wikipedia detected that a page by that name already existed and didn't want to replace it. Fixing this simply involved manually copying the complete contents of the original article over to the new page, replacing the Suryavanshi page with a redirect, and moving the talk page. --Shruti14 ^{talk • sign} 02:37, 4 May 2009 (UTC)

Merge proposal

I propose to merge Genealogy of Rama and Raghuvaṃśa dynasty into this article, since all three talks about the same dynasty. -- Pankaj Jain Capankajsmilyo (talk · contribs · count) 06:37, 3 January 2016 (UTC)

Help from some good editors

The family tree contributed should be improved and need good adjustment.can any one adjust it so it can fit in page.--Raghvendra99674010 (talk) 13:27, 24 September 2017 (UTC)