Jump to content

User talk:204.11.185.62: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 20: Line 20:
Please do not modify previously declined unblock requests. It gives the impression that the decline took into account your newly added comments. You are welcome to request a new unblock, if you can provide strong reason to believe there'll never be any more vandalism from this address. --[[User:Yamla|Yamla]] ([[User talk:Yamla|talk]]) 13:16, 27 September 2017 (UTC)
Please do not modify previously declined unblock requests. It gives the impression that the decline took into account your newly added comments. You are welcome to request a new unblock, if you can provide strong reason to believe there'll never be any more vandalism from this address. --[[User:Yamla|Yamla]] ([[User talk:Yamla|talk]]) 13:16, 27 September 2017 (UTC)

{{unblock I would also like to note that any past vandalism came from other students since this is a computer school with other students. I do not know if their Wikipedia uses this same guest account since we all use the same computer profile but on different computers. It doesn't seem fair that we use the same exact Wikipedia guest account. There have also been times where students have used this one specific computer. As I said before, making an account on a public computer would lead to people easily getting into my email account. It has happened before to another student that was once here. It also doesn't seem fair I am not allowed to delete any messages from users and bots. I am being honest and genuine here. I'm pretty sure you have had past experiences with vandalism on this computer or guest account. All I do is fix spelling errors and remove old information that has an old citation needed since no one has been able to give evidence to these information. Isn't the point of removing information with an old citation needed, to get rid of it because that said information can't be proved to be true?}}
{{unblock | I would also like to note that any past vandalism came from other students since this is a computer school with other students. I do not know if their Wikipedia uses this same guest account since we all use the same computer profile but on different computers. It doesn't seem fair that we use the same exact Wikipedia guest account. There have also been times where students have used this one specific computer. As I said before, making an account on a public computer would lead to people easily getting into my email account. It has happened before to another student that was once here. It also doesn't seem fair I am not allowed to delete any messages from users and bots. I am being honest and genuine here. I'm pretty sure you have had past experiences with vandalism on this computer or guest account. All I do is fix spelling errors and remove old information that has an old citation needed since no one has been able to give evidence to these information. Isn't the point of removing information with an old citation needed, to get rid of it because that said information can't be proved to be true? | }}

Revision as of 13:33, 27 September 2017

May 2017

Stop icon with clock
Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of Tue, 30 May 2017 13:15:05 GMT for abuse of editing privileges. In addition, your ability to edit your talk page has also been revoked. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System.  – Gilliam (talk) 15:13, 16 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

August 2017

Information icon Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. –72 (talk) 14:47, 23 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

September 2017

Information icon Hello, I'm PlyrStar93. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Minoan civilization— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. -★- PlyrStar93. Message me. 🖉 15:12, 14 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Prohibition in the United States. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. —usernamekiran(talk) 16:09, 26 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

204.11.185.62 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I was trying to remove improper information and I accidentally removed the entire section. Instead of clicking cancel, I decided to click the save button and then go into history to get the original text and fix it. This school system bot or whatever it is immediately blocked me and gave me the same message of making an account. I am not going to make an account on a public computer due to the fact that others could easily then get into my mail account. I have been denied any chance of trying to fix a mistake. I would also like to note that if I try to delete this school message from the talk page it reappears and blocks me from editing out a message I don't want.

Decline reason:

Chronic vandalism stretching back months. We won't be lifting the block here. Also, please refrain from blanking notices about this active block. Yamla (talk) 13:03, 27 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Please do not modify previously declined unblock requests. It gives the impression that the decline took into account your newly added comments. You are welcome to request a new unblock, if you can provide strong reason to believe there'll never be any more vandalism from this address. --Yamla (talk) 13:16, 27 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


This user is asking that their block be reviewed:

204.11.185.62 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I would also like to note that any past vandalism came from other students since this is a computer school with other students. I do not know if their Wikipedia uses this same guest account since we all use the same computer profile but on different computers. It doesn't seem fair that we use the same exact Wikipedia guest account. There have also been times where students have used this one specific computer. As I said before, making an account on a public computer would lead to people easily getting into my email account. It has happened before to another student that was once here. It also doesn't seem fair I am not allowed to delete any messages from users and bots. I am being honest and genuine here. I'm pretty sure you have had past experiences with vandalism on this computer or guest account. All I do is fix spelling errors and remove old information that has an old citation needed since no one has been able to give evidence to these information. Isn't the point of removing information with an old citation needed, to get rid of it because that said information can't be proved to be true?

Notes:

  • In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
  • Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.
Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2= I would also like to note that any past vandalism came from other students since this is a computer school with other students. I do not know if their Wikipedia uses this same guest account since we all use the same computer profile but on different computers. It doesn't seem fair that we use the same exact Wikipedia guest account. There have also been times where students have used this one specific computer. As I said before, making an account on a public computer would lead to people easily getting into my email account. It has happened before to another student that was once here. It also doesn't seem fair I am not allowed to delete any messages from users and bots. I am being honest and genuine here. I'm pretty sure you have had past experiences with vandalism on this computer or guest account. All I do is fix spelling errors and remove old information that has an old citation needed since no one has been able to give evidence to these information. Isn't the point of removing information with an old citation needed, to get rid of it because that said information can't be proved to be true?  |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1= I would also like to note that any past vandalism came from other students since this is a computer school with other students. I do not know if their Wikipedia uses this same guest account since we all use the same computer profile but on different computers. It doesn't seem fair that we use the same exact Wikipedia guest account. There have also been times where students have used this one specific computer. As I said before, making an account on a public computer would lead to people easily getting into my email account. It has happened before to another student that was once here. It also doesn't seem fair I am not allowed to delete any messages from users and bots. I am being honest and genuine here. I'm pretty sure you have had past experiences with vandalism on this computer or guest account. All I do is fix spelling errors and remove old information that has an old citation needed since no one has been able to give evidence to these information. Isn't the point of removing information with an old citation needed, to get rid of it because that said information can't be proved to be true?  |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1= I would also like to note that any past vandalism came from other students since this is a computer school with other students. I do not know if their Wikipedia uses this same guest account since we all use the same computer profile but on different computers. It doesn't seem fair that we use the same exact Wikipedia guest account. There have also been times where students have used this one specific computer. As I said before, making an account on a public computer would lead to people easily getting into my email account. It has happened before to another student that was once here. It also doesn't seem fair I am not allowed to delete any messages from users and bots. I am being honest and genuine here. I'm pretty sure you have had past experiences with vandalism on this computer or guest account. All I do is fix spelling errors and remove old information that has an old citation needed since no one has been able to give evidence to these information. Isn't the point of removing information with an old citation needed, to get rid of it because that said information can't be proved to be true?  |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}