Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stephen Paddock: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
No edit summary
Line 9: Line 9:
*''' Keep '''- per [[WP:Notability]]--[[User:Metalhead309|Metalhead309]] ([[User talk:Metalhead309|talk]])
*''' Keep '''- per [[WP:Notability]]--[[User:Metalhead309|Metalhead309]] ([[User talk:Metalhead309|talk]])
:I don't believe this falls under those grounds. He is only notable for this event, as [[WP:1E]] states is not viable for an article. [[User:404House|404House]] ([[User talk:404House|talk]]) 20:12, 3 October 2017 (UTC)
:I don't believe this falls under those grounds. He is only notable for this event, as [[WP:1E]] states is not viable for an article. [[User:404House|404House]] ([[User talk:404House|talk]]) 20:12, 3 October 2017 (UTC)
Quoting WP:1E "If the event is highly significant, and the individual's role within it is a large one, a separate article is generally appropriate." [[User:Metalhead309|Da_Metalhead309]] ([[User talk:Metalhead309|talk]]) 20:16, 3 October 2017 (UTC)
* '''Redirect''' [[2017 Las Vegas Strip shooting]], this is a bit redundant looking back on it now, and I was the one who did the undo whilst not logged in. Woops. [[User:404House|404House]] ([[User talk:404House|talk]]) 20:12, 3 October 2017 (UTC)
* '''Redirect''' [[2017 Las Vegas Strip shooting]], this is a bit redundant looking back on it now, and I was the one who did the undo whilst not logged in. Woops. [[User:404House|404House]] ([[User talk:404House|talk]]) 20:12, 3 October 2017 (UTC)

Revision as of 20:16, 3 October 2017

Stephen Paddock (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This is the biography for the suspect in the 2017 Las Vegas Strip shooting. An attempt was made to redirect to the main article on the event, was reverted, and so here we are. It's not quite an AfD, but it's not quite a merger, since the section on the individual in the main article is probably of equal or higher quality, and it's not clear that anything substantial in particular would need to be merged. Subject does not appear to be notable for anything other than this single event. GMGtalk 19:49, 3 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I don't believe this falls under those grounds. He is only notable for this event, as WP:1E states is not viable for an article. 404House (talk) 20:12, 3 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quoting WP:1E "If the event is highly significant, and the individual's role within it is a large one, a separate article is generally appropriate." Da_Metalhead309 (talk) 20:16, 3 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]