User talk:Yamla

Create a protected page

Hi, I would like to create a page that is being protected by you. I have edited the previous content and I believe it meets all the criteria/guidelines now. It is called Artist Publishing Group. Is it possible? Thanks. BarbaraRRC (talk) 01:43, 9 May 2017 (UTC)

No, this is not generally possible. (Almost) anyone is free to edit any page on the Wikipedia. The policy that applies here is WP:OWN. --Yamla (talk) 12:06, 9 May 2017 (UTC)

Additionally, you are a sockpuppet of the blocked vandal, Fairfax17 (talk · contribs), and aren't welcome on Wikipedia at all while that account remains blocked. --Yamla (talk) 12:09, 9 May 2017 (UTC)

How do I restore the page you deleted

There's this page S.M.A.R.T. Chase, due to the violation of WP:PAID, you deleted it. I'm wondering whether you can restore the page and what infomation I should add or change. User:Swnheams(talk)21:12,27 March 2017(UTC)

I believe it would be inappropriate to restore it due to the violations of WP:PAID and WP:COI. If you are unrelated to Bliss Media and to the accounts involved in that page and you wish to create that article, you are certainly welcome to do so. If you disagree, you may follow the procedures in WP:RfU. --Yamla (talk) 13:48, 27 March 2017 (UTC)

Then could you provide me the information in the deleted page S.M.A.R.T. Chase, so I could start a new one. User:Swnheams(talk) 22:01, 29 March 2017(UTC)

First, I need to know what, if any, your relationship is to Bliss Media and to the other accounts involved in editing that page. --Yamla (talk) 14:14, 29 March 2017 (UTC)

I'm of no relations to Bliss Media, and they don't pay me at all to edit the page. I'm simply a fan of Orlando, and would like to help editing this page.User:Swnheams(talk) 11:03, 5 April 2017(UTC)

I second User:Swnheams's request. I think you should at least peruse or let others take a look at the content of the writing in the deleted page. Why don't we just edit out any writing that seems promotional? Deleting the whole page seems a bit overboard and unfair to Orlando Bloom, who now has a struggling career in the film business. Rewriting the whole page seems a bit inefficient and too much work. I think a new article in Elle UK has briefly touched upon the new name of the movie. What would you say? Thanks. I am of no relation to Bliss Media either.Supermansaga (talk) 11:07, 2 May 2017 (UTC)

After careful consideration, I'm going to insist on WP:RfU. That page was written by a marketing company and I believe it would be inappropriate to simply restore it. And unfortunately, I cannot restore only parts of it as this would screw up the (required) attribution. In any case, there's basically nothing worth salvaging there. And specifically, there's no reason not to just recreate the page. --Yamla (talk) 11:12, 2 May 2017 (UTC)

Ok. I'll try WP:RfU. It seems to me that Bliss Media is a legitimate movie production company competing with the six major Hollywood studios, not just being a marketing company vandalizing on Wikipedia. The fact that you mentioned attribution already seems to me that the writing wasn't so bad and being one-way shameless marketing. It appears it might be worth salvaging. Have you read that Elle UK article after all? Thanks.Supermansaga (talk) 11:29, 2 May 2017 (UTC)

Turns out, Supermansaga (talk · contribs) was yet another sockpuppet account for Bliss Media to inappropriately spam Wikipedia. That page should almost certainly be deleted once again. --Yamla (talk) 14:40, 8 May 2017 (UTC)

I have received an off-wiki request to revisit the block of the editor who wrote the 2017 version of Bliss. Looking at the earlier extremely promotional and exaggerated version deleted by AfD, and the 2017 version that you deleted, I do not think the 2017 version promotional. Could you restore it ,and unblock Supermann. I know that he socked in frustration, but that's possible a response to the ptroblem with the article. His other editors seem ok. DGG ( talk ) 22:11, 17 May 2017 (UTC)

That user engaged in undisclosed paid editing and lied about it, multiple times. The article was originally deleted as part of an AfD, see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bliss Media Ltd. Now, I'm happy to unblock the user if, but only if, they have read and understood WP:PAID and WP:COI and agree to abide by that. I suggest specifically they'd have to disclose their conflict of interest and agree not to edit any article directly if the article is related to Bliss Media, broadly construed. They'd be very welcome to suggest changes on the article's discussion page, of course, so long as they disclose their conflict of interest. On those grounds, I'd be willing to undelete the article on Bliss Media. You are free to immediately return their talk page access to discuss these terms (though note another admin revoked TPA). Note that my statements here indicate what circumstances I think are appropriate for unblocking the user; you are welcome to disagree with these. --Yamla (talk) 22:28, 17 May 2017 (UTC)

I'vespoken to him, and he has agreed. If you would unblock his talk page access, he can say so directly. DGG ( talk ) 04:57, 7 June 2017 (UTC)

Done, Supermann (talk · contribs) now has access to his talk page. --Yamla (talk) 11:33, 7 June 2017 (UTC)

Thanks again. Now is it safe for me to request undeletion of the Bliss Media page? My version is definitely entirely different from that propaganda deleted by MBisanz back on February 16, 2016. It is simple and short and primarily shows filmography. Same as the Thomas Price (actor) page. It must have been entirely different from the version deleted by Cirt back on April 20, 2010. Please undelete it and take out any puffery. If you look at my edits from yesterday, you know my world view is way bigger than Bliss Media. Supermann (talk) 16:08, 10 June 2017 (UTC)

No, absolutely not. That would be a violation of the terms of your unblock and I'm honestly stunned you brought this up. --Yamla (talk) 16:28, 10 June 2017 (UTC)

I thought this is no different from me making suggestions on the talk page which you allowed. And I had brought it up in my prior declaration. I thought you knew of it, but just forgot. That is why I sent this reminder and I am equally stunned by your reaction. I wouldn't have brought it up, had DGG not seen the content of the previously deleted Bliss Media page. But he is busy right now and doesn't think the undeletion is a priority. Anyways, I won't push my luck further. Supermann (talk) 18:16, 11 June 2017 (UTC)

The goal is to ensure you have interests outside of Bliss Media; that'll back up your claim that you don't actually have a conflict of interest, and therefore should indeed be allowed to edit Bliss Media and related topics. --Yamla (talk) 21:02, 11 June 2017 (UTC)

Even after undeletion, I won't be making direct edits on them for six months other than making suggestions on talk page. Isn't that in compliance with your unblock terms, too? I care for those three pages because they are created by me from scratch. Over the past ten years, I have usually added sentences, if not paragraphs, in other edits, but never created new pages. I definitely have interests outside of Bliss Media, if the past two days' contributions and IP addresses don't seem obvious enough to fit into my 10-year narrative. Please keep observing. Thx. Supermann (talk) 21:37, 11 June 2017 (UTC)

The problem is, you are asking for those edits to be restored. Practically speaking, that's the same as redoing those edits yourself. So no. Please keep editing pages unrelated to Bliss Media. --Yamla (talk) 21:39, 11 June 2017 (UTC)

If you say so. Pls enjoy this new page Film censorship in China that I just created and am working on. Supermann (talk) 02:41, 12 June 2017 (UTC)

Hope you have been well. You got a chance to read the film censorship article? Any possibility that I might get a parole like OJ did, based on IP addresses and contributions? You had said you would be willing to undelete back on 22:28, 17 May 2017 (UTC). I'll continue to stay away from the undeleted article. Many thanks. Supermann (talk) 23:16, 23 July 2017 (UTC)

Thanks

Thank you for addressing my unblock request so quickly, I appreciate it Default.XBE (talk) 15:14, 25 January 2017 (UTC)

What if I make this a section?

Thank you for your help, and actually paying attention. User:leighroy4 —Preceding undated comment added 15:23, 3 May 2016 (UTC)

67.244.58.187

Pleese unblock me! I have not been Vandelizing lately. 67.244.58.187 (talk) 10:00, 14 November 2015 (EST) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ipadguy (talk • contribs)

This is incorrect. Furthermore, I am extending the block on Paleontologist99 to indefinite, as it is clear you have no intention of ever following Wikipedia rules and policies, even after promising repeatedly to do so. --Yamla (talk) 15:55, 14 November 2015 (UTC)

umm YOU are getting out of hand Yamla and i don't Believe you that you get email from Famous people!!!! i think YOU are lie. i don't think YOU are doing your job right!! why you are extending the block yes i get it but why??? YOU are just mean. you are just like " the grinch" 71.11.116.64

Sign, so the archive bot can archive this section. --Yamla (talk) 17:59, 18 July 2016 (UTC)

Juanacho Block

Hey, I need your help. Juanacho is messing up some pages by deleting some sources and necessary elements. I want her/him to be blocked again with your help since you have done that before...I guess. Please do reply soon. I want Wikipedia to be a resourceful place but he/she is ruining it. Kikkokalabud (talk)

Brexx

Hi Yalma, this is Brexx, you blocked me way back in 2008, and ok, yes before i deserved it, because i wasn't very familiar with the rules of wikipedia…but now im different …i total changed….I pledge to not put anything that i didn't personally write and not upload images or other media that are not entirely my own work. I understand that copyrighted material should not be put in wikipedia and that there will be consequences if users don't follow the rules of wikipedia and of the law. Anyone who wishes to edit wikipedia should follow their rules and take them seriously.

I have read the relevant policy pages on Wikipedia and some Wikipedia articles on the subject of copyright, i read the Wikipedia:Copyrights and the Wikipedia:Copyright violations articles several times and understand them completely. Wikipedia is very dear to my heart and now i fully comply with the rules of copyright and the rules of wikipedia and i will only assume good faith…….if you see all my edits from all my recent accounts, you will see that all im doing is adding reliable information with reliable sources…….please, i don't want to keep going from account to account…i want stability……ill do anything….i admit i should not have created all these new accounts, but what's done is done, and im begging for forgiveness and closure………if your still spectical, you can unblock me and have someone monitor my edits, im more than ok with that because i know that im now editing in good faith and adding reliable information with relialbe sources…..please open a discussion about unblocking me here and see what other admins think: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:AN

side note about my brexx account: I forgot my Brexx password and the e-mail i registered when i created the account got deleted because i did not use it for a long time, , so i cant recover my wikipedia password, so i can't use the brexx account anymore...everytime i create a new account, i get blocked.....

Thank you, Yamla!

Much obliged for terminating the collateral damage! I have to tell you that, despite my annoyance, I've gotten a huge laugh out of this--these guys are the rudest possible tenants of an office building with a shared common area, but to think that on top of leaving ramen noodles in the sink drain for others to clean up, they SPAM WIKIPEDIA!? and GET ME AUTOBLOCKED!? You couldn't pay a Hollywood writer to dream that up for some sitcom. I appreciate your good faith very much! -

Hello?

Have you been to the Teahouse?

Administrators' newsletter – October 2017

News and updates for administrators from the past month (September 2017).

Administrator changes

Boing! said Zebedee • Ansh666 • Ad Orientem

Tonywalton • AmiDaniel • Silence • BanyanTree • Magioladitis • Vanamonde93 • Mr.Z-man • Jdavidb • Jakec • Ram-Man • Yelyos • Kurt Shaped Box

Guideline and policy news

• Following a successful proposal to create it, a new user right called "edit filter helper" is now assignable and revocable by administrators. The right allows non-administrators to view the details of private edit filters, but not to edit them.
• Following a discussion about mass-application of ECP and how the need for logging and other details of an evolving consensus may have been missed by some administrators, a rough guide to extended confirmed protection has been written. This information page describes how the extended-confirmed aspects of the protection policy are currently being applied by administrators.

Technical news

• You can now search for IP ranges at Special:Contributions. Some log pages and Special:DeletedContributions are not yet supported. Wildcards (e.g. 192.168.0.*) are also not supported, but the popular contribsrange gadget will continue to work.

Arbitration

• Community consultation on the 2017 candidates for CheckUser and Oversight has concluded. The Arbitration Committee will appoint successful candidates by October 11.
• A request for comment is open regarding the structure, rules, and procedures of the December 2017 Arbitration Committee election, and how to resolve any issues not covered by existing rules.

---

• Discuss this newsletter
• Subscribe
• Archive

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:23, 2 October 2017 (UTC)

Remember me?

You falsely blocked me years ago and was one of the administrators that bullied me off of here. Well guess what? I'm back. Get used to it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2600:1003:B458:3D2E:F8D1:2981:F28A:5D5 (talk) 09:18, 10 October 2017 (UTC)

Blocked by SpacemanSpiff. --Yamla (talk) 11:10, 10 October 2017 (UTC)

Login attempts

Reading your comment at WP:ANI. Reading everyone else's comments, it probably is a malicious user ... but given I managed to lock both myself and another non-existent user out, because I couldn't get my password/user right a few minutes ago, I wouldn't always assume malice. (not sure what happened ... as I was right all along, it was only after 2 fails, that I started trying other things ... root cause is probably I'm using a different keyboard today. Sometimes people's minds are just somewhere else, and use the username for a different website - if it's short and common). Nfitz (talk) 16:49, 10 October 2017 (UTC)

Yeah, I suppose that's a possibility. Particularly as 'yamla' may actually be a name (or a nick-name) in that particular area of the world. --Yamla (talk) 16:54, 10 October 2017 (UTC)

A Dobos torte for you!

7&6=thirteen (☎) has given you a Dobos torte to enjoy! Seven layers of fun because you deserve it. To give a Dobos torte and spread the WikiLove, just place {{subst:Dobos Torte}} on someone else's talkpage, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend.

15:13, 11 October 2017 (UTC)

Please avoid threats

You are not a person qualified to talk about copyright. Do not use your admin privileges to censor articles and harras other Wikipedia users!--109.92.171.142 (talk) 13:37, 13 October 2017 (UTC)

I am qualified to enforce Wikipedia's policies and guidelines and you will be blocked if you continue to ignore our policies and guidelines. --Yamla (talk) 13:37, 13 October 2017 (UTC)

It is you who ignores Wikipedia's policies and guidelines through arbitrary interpretations these policies and guidelines and abusive use of the admin privileges.--109.92.171.142 (talk) 13:39, 13 October 2017 (UTC)