Talk:Looking 4 Myself: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 11:05, 18 October 2017

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Looking 4 Myself article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Looking 4 Myself has been listed as one of the Music good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.

Looking 4 Myself is the main article in the Looking 4 Myself series, a good topic. This is identified as among the best series of articles produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
December 9, 2012	Good article nominee	Not listed
May 22, 2013	Good article nominee	Listed
June 5, 2014	Good topic candidate	Promoted

Current status: Good article

Albums GA‑class

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Albums, an attempt at building a useful resource on recordings from a variety of genres. If you would like to participate, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.AlbumsWikipedia:WikiProject AlbumsTemplate:WikiProject AlbumsAlbum articles
GA	This article has been rated as GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

Pop music GA‑class Low‑importance

	Pop music portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pop music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to pop music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Pop musicWikipedia:WikiProject Pop musicTemplate:WikiProject Pop musicPop music articles
GA	This article has been rated as GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

R&B and Soul Music GA‑class Low‑importance

	R&B and Soul Music portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject R&B and Soul Music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of R&B and Soul Music articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.R&B and Soul MusicWikipedia:WikiProject R&B and Soul MusicTemplate:WikiProject R&B and Soul MusicR&B and Soul Music articles
GA	This article has been rated as GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Twisted

I don't think that Twisted is going to be released as the sixth single since Dive, which is the latest single, was released a very long time ago, and Usher released the single Go Missin', which will be part of his next album. --188.109.161.47 (talk) 09:32, 28 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The source citing the information states that "Usher is set to perform his latest single", denoting that "Twisted" is indeed a single. As of now, it has never been confirmed whether "Go Missin'" was released for his next album, just as a free download on Valentine's Day. Et 3 rnal 16:56, 28 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Certifications

Lokking 4 Myself got a silver Certification in UK. The Link: ^[1] Please complete this, thanks (77.23.175.220 (talk) 15:29, 3 May 2015 (UTC)).[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 10 external links on Looking 4 Myself. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.allaccess.com/urban/future-releases
Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.allaccess.com/urban
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20121219094524/http://www.gaonchart.co.kr/main/section/online/download/list.gaon to http://gaonchart.co.kr/main/section/online/download/list.gaon
Corrected formatting/usage for http://https://www.billboard.com/artist/usher/chart-history//
Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.hitsdailydouble.com/sales/salescht.cgi
Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.ariacharts.com.au/pages/charts_display_urban.asp?chart=1Q40RB
Corrected formatting/usage for http://zpav.pl/rankingi/listy/top100/index.php
Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.rsg.co.za/
Added archive http://www.webcitation.org/60CLi4JAr?url=http://www.g-music.com.tw/GMusicBillboard2.aspx to http://www.g-music.com.tw/GMusicBillboard2.aspx
Corrected formatting/usage for http://shop.jbhifi.co.nz/music/urban-grooves/looking-4-myself/55994

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:52, 25 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Summarising sentence under Critical Reception

The Metacritic score indicates "generally favorable reviews". It would be appropriate to open the paragraph under Critical Reception with a sentence that makes clear how well the song was received by most music critics.(82.217.67.186 (talk) 11:05, 18 October 2017 (UTC))[reply]

^ http://www.bpi.co.uk/certified-awards/search.aspx

[1] ttp://www.bpi.co.uk/certified-awards/search.aspx

[1]

@@ Line 61: / Line 61: @@
 Cheers.—[[User:InternetArchiveBot|'''<span style="color:darkgrey;font-family:monospace">InternetArchiveBot</span>''']] <span style="color:green;font-family:Rockwell">([[User talk:InternetArchiveBot|Report bug]])</span> 19:52, 25 May 2017 (UTC)
+== Summarising sentence under Critical Reception ==
+The Metacritic score indicates "generally favorable reviews". It would be appropriate to open the paragraph under Critical Reception with a sentence that makes clear how well the song was received by most music critics.([[Special:Contributions/82.217.67.186|82.217.67.186]] ([[User talk:82.217.67.186|talk]]) 11:05, 18 October 2017 (UTC))