User talk:Jake Brockman

Zhang Lijun(enterpriser)

hi,Jake Brockman,i wanna talk to you heart to heart,the article Zhang Lijun(enterpriser) is my work,and i think its resources are not weak,such as Financial Times,Bloomberg,China Daily,Reuters,Market Watch,those are globally important news agency.what matters is that Zhang Lijun(enterpriser) is the chairman of a Hong Kong stock exchange listed company！！！ Privacypolicyer (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 10:56, 9 September 2017 (UTC)

Privacypolicyer, Please have a look at what I wrote on Talk:Zhang Lijun(enterpriser). Let me briefly repeat. Being a senior exec does not make one automatically notable. The reasons are given on the talk page. Wikipedia is looking for individual notability of a person. The links you mention do not talk about Zhang Lijun as a person, but only mention him in passing in his role as Chairman. This is not sufficient. Please compare this with Jack Ma. There are ample sources about him as a person. There's a book, an interview and a report about him. What has been presented in this article is routine reporting about the company that just states the fact that Zhang Lijun is the chairman without giving any substantive information about him. Unfortunately that is not enough to establish notability for reasons I have outlined on the article talk page. I am also concerned that you said "the article [...] is my work". If you are being paid to write this article or have a relationship by working for V1 Group or anyone connected to it, you have a conflict of interest and must abide by the rules for editing when conflicted. I am also concerned about your relationship with previous users who have created or edited similar articles. _pseudonym Jake Brockman ^talk 11:50, 9 September 2017 (UTC)

I see,Jake Brockman,thank you,I give it up!Privacypolicyer (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 13:19, 9 September 2017 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 10

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Hohe Weg (lighthouse), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Offshore. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:38, 10 March 2017 (UTC)

Altered speedy deletion rationale: Colby Thibault (album)

Hello Jake Brockman. I am just letting you know that I deleted Colby Thibault (album), a page you tagged for speedy deletion, under a different criterion from the one you provided, since the one you used did not apply to the page in question. Thank you. SoWhy 07:49, 15 May 2017 (UTC)

@SoWhy: Thanks. I hovered above A9 and A7 for a while as both categories actually do not fully cover the case. A9 requires the artist not to have an article ("This applies to any article about a musical recording or list of musical recordings where none of the contributing recording artists has an article). Obviously at the point in time where the CSD is submitted, he does have article - even though the artist's article will eventually not exist due to it's own A7. So it was a decision between effectively inheriting A7, which does not specifically cover recordings, just bands/artists and A9 which also is not a perfect fit. Needles to say, the entire complex of artist in combination with the hoax-esque album articles falls somewhere in the region of A7/A9/G3 if taking their spirit as guideline. _pseudonym Jake Brockman ^talk 08:07, 15 May 2017 (UTC)

I understand but A7 never applies to recordings. Either A9 does or it does not. Although the wording is not explicit, A9 usually considered valid if the artist's article is tagged for speedy deletion. I think I'll propose a clarification. Regards SoWhy 08:14, 15 May 2017 (UTC)

Contested deletion/smartowner

This page should not be speedily deleted because.. User:Jake_Brockman as you mentioned here User_talk:Draknight#Smartowner this is the ref for the names of the people involved here from my knowledge this can be added in wiki. please go through it and remove the deletion for more correction if needed too.

Thank You 
God Bless

Asshole

Animal verbs in English comment

We have responded to your proposed deletion of the Animal verbs in English page on that page. It is not a dictionary page, but a list page, as we explain in our posted response. (EditExpress (talk) 22:59, 1 October 2017 (UTC))

New Page Reviewer Newsletter

Hello Jake Brockman, thank you for your efforts reviewing new pages!

Backlog update:

• The new page backlog is currently at 14304 pages. We have worked hard to decrease from over 22,000, but more hard work is needed! Please consider reviewing even just a few pages a day.
• Currently there are 532 pages in the backlog that were created by non-autoconfirmed users before WP:ACTRIAL. The NPP project is undertaking a drive to clear these pages from the backlog before they hit the 90 day Google index point. Please consider reviewing a few today!

Technology update:

• The Wikimedia Foundation is currently working on creating a new filter for page curation that will allow new page patrollers to filter by extended confirmed status. For more information see: T175225

General project update:

• On 14 September 2017 the English Wikipedia began the autoconfirmed article creation trial. For a six month period, creation of articles in the mainspace of the English Wikipedia will be restricted to users with autoconfirmed status. New users who attempt article creation will now be redirected to a newly designed landing page.
• Before clicking on a reference or external link while reviewing a page, please be careful that the site looks trustworthy. If you have a question about the safety of clicking on a link, it is better not to click on it.
• To keep up with the latest conversation on New Pages Patrol or to ask questions, you can go to Wikipedia talk:New pages patrol/Reviewers and add it to your watchlist.

---

If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, go here. TonyBallioni (talk) 02:16, 19 September 2017 (UTC)

Help

Hello i think u did block my what I wrote by mistake i was trying to add references not promoting a page thank u — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mustafa qaronni (talk • contribs) 12:45, 21 October 2017 (UTC)

@Mustafa qaronni: I did not block your page, I recommended it to be deleted which was approved and executed by an administrator. The concern is two fold. 1. the wikipedia article seems to be written by yourself about yourself, i.e. is an autobiography. As per WP:AB, writing about yourself is strongly discouraged as it is difficult to write from a neutral point of view. Clearly, the language used included a fair amount of puffery and may therefore be promotional in nature. 2. the I am not convinced that the article passes notability, particularly notability for musicians. Wikipedia would normally be looking for wide coverage across a range of reputable media over a period of time to establish notability. I did not find such sources. _pseudonym Jake Brockman ^talk 13:22, 21 October 2017 (UTC)

HELP

at the page of medicine baba was trying to put authentic information, if required I can share the photographs and content to prove my inputs.

regards Arpitjain1984 (talk) 09:50, 6 November 2017 (UTC)

please guide on how to insert authentic photographs at the page

regards Arpitjain1984 (talk) 09:52, 6 November 2017 (UTC)

Arpitjain1984 I don't question that he has received those awards, however such information needs to be proven before being added to Wikipedia. For a simple instruction to uploading images, this may be helpful: WP:IUI. Please note, that images you upload must be copyright free. However, I do not think that images are sufficient to prove any of the awards! Images don't say a lot and they can be taken out of context. In order for the awards to be proven, one of the following needs to be provided: a) an article in a major news media that talks about this (e.g. The Hindustan or Times of India), b) a link to the official website of the organisation presenting the award that shows the recipient information, or c) a press release by the presenting organisation. I hope this helps. _pseudonym Jake Brockman ^talk 10:06, 6 November 2017 (UTC)

dear sir I'm putting media references along with link to the website presented the award. http://www.delhigauravaward.org/awardee http://www.huffingtonpost.in/delhipedia/medicine-baba-a-mobile-me_b_9514314.html http://www.newsx.com/offbeat/53601-watch-the-incredible-story-of-indias-medicine-baba http://www.radioaustralia.net.au/international/radio/program/connect-asia/indias-medicine-baba-collecting-unused-drugs-to-save-lives/1140058

hope this will suffice in my support Arpitjain1984 (talk) 10:17, 6 November 2017 (UTC)

Arpitjain1984, the references are ok, however they do not prove the awards and recognitions. In one of the videos you can see a few certificates for a split second but they are not being talked about. The Delhi Gaurav may be ok as the photo evidence is there (I have added). The other referneces show his work, but not awards. All the other awards should not be added unless there is specific evidence._pseudonym Jake Brockman ^talk 10:28, 6 November 2017 (UTC)

PLEASE GUIDE HOW AND WHERE I CAN ATTACHED PHOTO EVIDENCES OF OTHERS. AND PLEASE CAN YOU ADD THIS DELHI GAURAV PHOTO ON HIS PAGE AS WELL. Arpitjain1984 (talk) 10:33, 6 November 2017 (UTC)

Arpitjain1984, I have provided the link to the photo upload guide above. There is is again: WP:IUI. Unfortunately I can NOT add the picture of the Delhi Gaurav award as this would violate Wikipedia's copyrights policy. Only photos that are clear of copyrights can be uploaded - those are usually pictures you have taken yourself. Pictures taken from other website are usually problematic. _pseudonym Jake Brockman ^talk 10:44, 6 November 2017 (UTC)

New Page Reviewer Newsletter

Hello Jake Brockman, thank you for your efforts reviewing new pages!

Backlog update:

• The new page backlog is currently at 12,878 pages. We have worked hard to decrease from over 22,000, but more hard work is needed! Please consider reviewing even just a few pages a day.
• We have successfully cleared the backlog of pages created by non-confirmed accounts before ACTRIAL. Thank you to everyone who participated in that drive.

Technology update:

• Primefac has created a script that will assist in requesting revision deletion for copyright violations that are often found in new pages. For more information see User:Primefac/revdel.

General project update:

• The Article Wizard has been updated and simplified to match the layout style of the new user landing page. If you have not yet seen it, take a look.
• To keep up with the latest conversation on New Pages Patrol or to ask questions, you can go to Wikipedia talk:New pages patrol/Reviewers and add it to your watchlist.

---

If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, go here. TonyBallioni (talk) 17:47, 21 October 2017 (UTC)

Halloween cheer!

Happy Halloween!

---

Hello Jake Brockman:
Thanks for all of your contributions to improve Wikipedia, and have a happy and enjoyable Halloween!
    – North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 12:15, 27 October 2017 (UTC)

Send Halloween cheer by adding {{subst:Happy Halloween}} to user talk pages with a friendly message.

Halloween cheer!

Happy Halloween!

---

Hello Jake Brockman:
Thanks for all of your contributions to improve Wikipedia, and have a happy and enjoyable Halloween!
    – Linguist^unEins^uno 18:46, 31 October 2017 (UTC)

Send Halloween cheer by adding {{subst:Happy Halloween}} to user talk pages with a friendly message.

A brownie for you!

Thanks for fixing that stub I made at periscope binoculars! Branchofpine, Have a chat, My edits 19:35, 8 November 2017 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Special Barnstar
	-s.s.jin S.s.jin (talk) 20:32, 8 November 2017 (UTC)

2nd opinion

does User:Stacey-warwickMCF/sandbox cross the border into WP:CSD#G11ville -- Dlohcierekim (talk) 13:26, 14 November 2017 (UTC)

@Dlohcierekim: Thanks for reaching out. Tough one... If all the claims were properly referenced with good, independent sources, it may just about pass (taken independently). However,I'm slightly more concerned about the potential COI and copyvio. I think a few sections are taken from his site, see copyvio comparable. So taking this all in combination with lack of sources, this should be G11 and G12. _pseudonym Jake Brockman ^talk 13:47, 14 November 2017 (UTC)

Thanks. did not want to go Judge Dredd. -- Dlohcierekim (talk) 13:48, 14 November 2017 (UTC)

New Page Patrol thanks you.

		The New Page Patroller's Barnstar
		For being one of the top 100 reviewers of the past year. Thank you for your service! — Insertcleverphrasehere (or here) 22:00, 23 November 2017 (UTC)

Six Million v The Six Million in history

Regarding the use of the definite article preceding 'six', do you know which sources do that? I am wondering if perhaps this has more potential than simply a disambiguation page and if it could potentially be a stub explaining references to 'the six million' over time. This is a phrase I've seen in news articles back to 1900, although under difference contexts like I think explaining the worldwide total of Jews or the total who were being persecuted in Russia or something like that. ScratchMarshall (talk) 15:54, 24 November 2017 (UTC)

ScratchMarshall that's a good point. I did some initial research and did not find enough to really convince myself this may be worthy of an article. I have heard some people - particularly Americans - use it. One of my former co-workers who was Jewish referred to holocaust victims as "the six million" a couple of times. I found some incidental use in such way like the following: [1], [2], [3]_pseudonym Jake Brockman ^talk 16:09, 24 November 2017 (UTC)

http://query.nytimes.com/mem/archive-free/pdf?res=9E01E7D61F3CE433A25752C1A9609C946197D6CF in 1900 might be the earliest association of the number with Judaism: "There are 6,000,000 living, bleeding, suffering arguments in favor of Zionism". I'm not aware of any from earlier on. ScratchMarshall (talk) 16:39, 24 November 2017 (UTC)

ScratchMarshall, this is without article, though, and probably refers to 6 million people in the US at the time. A coincidence in numbers I'd assume. _pseudonym Jake Brockman ^talk 17:02, 24 November 2017 (UTC)