User talk:Copystar: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 15:41, 30 December 2017

hello, I was in Nelsons class doing the project and I also asked you to help me find ww1 books, I know i have bugged you a lot, but i was just wondering why i can't see my page unless i got to my contributions. It says in there that someone has done stuff like change my title from weapons of world war one, to weapons of world war 1, but everytime i try to get on to it, i can't. Just wondering if you could help thank you!

Your article has been moved to AfC space

Hi! I would like to inform you that the Articles for Creation submission which was previously located here: User:Copystar/Persons day has been moved to Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Persons day, this move was made automatically and doesn't affect your article, if you have any questions please ask on my talk page! Have a nice day. ArticlesForCreationBot (talk) 22:12, 21 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation

Persons day, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see what needs to be done to bring it to the next level.
Please continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping Wikipedia!

mabdul 22:15, 21 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please see Talk:Persons day#Questionable notability. --Skeezix1000 (talk) 19:03, 4 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Barnstar

		The Christianity Barnstar
		Dear Copystar, I award you The Christianity Barnstar for all of your contributions to WikiProject Christianity, especially your recent additions to the list of Methodist churches. You are making a difference here! Keep up the good work! With regards, Anupam^Talk 01:22, 18 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright problem on Tara Cooper

Material you included in the above article appears to have been copied from the copyright web page http://openstudio.ca/printopolis-publication-now-available/. Copying text directly from a source is a copyright violation. Unfortunately, for copyright reasons, the content had to be removed. Please leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions or if you think I made a mistake. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 21:24, 12 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Tara Cooper

Hello Copystar,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Tara Cooper for deletion, because it seems to be copied from another source, probably infringing copyright.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to rewrite it in your own words, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Template:Z166

Robert G. (talk) 06:52, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Tara Cooper

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Tara Cooper requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://uwaterloo.ca/fine-arts/about/people/faculty/tara-cooper/tara-cooper-curriculum-vitae. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Robert G. (talk) 06:54, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

About the above messages regarding copyright violations, you may wish to visit the discussion here. Seagull123 Φ 19:16, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (November 13)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Sulfurboy was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage (not just mere mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of people, the golden rule and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners and Help:Introduction to referencing/1), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please note IMDB is not considered a reliable source.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Copystar/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Sulfurboy (talk) 20:48, 13 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Copystar, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Sulfurboy (talk) 20:48, 13 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Copy paste from Draft to Mainspace

You shouldn't copy-paste content from Draft into Mainspace as was done with Draft:Tom Longboat Award -> Tom Longboat Awards. The article history makes it look like you are the sole and original author of the content, and not User:Brandsant22 who actually wrote most of the article. You should notify on the talk page who the original author was. -- GreenC 15:33, 29 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I understand and I certainly did not intend to take credit from User:Brandsant22 who I very much recognize did a great deal of work in setting up the table of the original article. However, there is some additional context that you would not have known which is that I also did considerable work within and using User:Brandsant22 sandbox during a Wikipedia Editathon dedicated Elite Aboriginal Athletes that we were both working on. I recognize that this is also not proper Wikipedia protocol but at the time we was unclear how to handover the work from one user's Sandbox to another. That all being said, I will take your suggestion and give User:Brandsant22 his due on the talk page. Copystar (talk) 15:40, 30 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Revision as of 15:32, 30 December 2017 edit Copystar (talk \| contribs) 214 edits →Copy paste from Draft to Mainspace ← Previous edit		Revision as of 15:41, 30 December 2017 edit undo Copystar (talk \| contribs) 214 edits m →Copy paste from Draft to Mainspace Next edit →
Line 91:		Line 91:
	You shouldn't copy-paste content from Draft into Mainspace as was done with [[Draft:Tom Longboat Award]] -> [[Tom Longboat Awards]]. The article history makes it look like you are the sole and original author of the content, and not [[User:Brandsant22]] who actually wrote most of the article. You should notify on the talk page who the original author was. -- [[User:GreenC\|<span style="color: #006A4E;">'''Green'''</span>]][[User_talk:GreenC\|<span style="color: #009933;">'''C'''</span>]] 15:33, 29 December 2017 (UTC)		You shouldn't copy-paste content from Draft into Mainspace as was done with [[Draft:Tom Longboat Award]] -> [[Tom Longboat Awards]]. The article history makes it look like you are the sole and original author of the content, and not [[User:Brandsant22]] who actually wrote most of the article. You should notify on the talk page who the original author was. -- [[User:GreenC\|<span style="color: #006A4E;">'''Green'''</span>]][[User_talk:GreenC\|<span style="color: #009933;">'''C'''</span>]] 15:33, 29 December 2017 (UTC)

	I understand and I certainly did not intend to take credit from [[User:Brandsant22]] who I very much recognize did a great deal of work in setting up the table of the original article. However, there is some additional context that you would not have known which is that I also did considerable work within and using [[User:Brandsant22]] sandbox during a Wikipedia Editathon dedicated Elite Aboriginal Athletes that we were both working on. I recognize that this is also not proper Wikipedia protocol but at the time we was unclear how to handover the work from one user's Sandbox to another. That all being said, I will take your suggestion and give [[User:Brandsant22]] his due on the talk page. ~~Thank~~ ~~you!~~		I understand and I certainly did not intend to take credit from [[User:Brandsant22]] who I very much recognize did a great deal of work in setting up the table of the original article. However, there is some additional context that you would not have known which is that I also did considerable work within and using [[User:Brandsant22]] sandbox during a Wikipedia Editathon dedicated Elite Aboriginal Athletes that we were both working on. I recognize that this is also not proper Wikipedia protocol but at the time we was unclear how to handover the work from one user's Sandbox to another. That all being said, I will take your suggestion and give [[User:Brandsant22]] his due on the talk page. [[User:Copystar\|Copystar]] ([[User talk:Copystar#top\|talk]]) 15:40, 30 December 2017 (UTC)