Jump to content

Untermassfeld fossil site: Difference between revisions

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Browse history interactively
← Previous editNext edit →
Content deleted Content added
VisualWikitext
m cleanup using AWB
added ref to published Roebroeks et al. paper
Line 4: Line 4:
In a series of papers published between 2013 and 2017,<ref>{{Cite journal|last=Garcia|first=Joan|last2=Landeck|first2=Günter|last3=Martínez|first3=Kenneth|last4=Carbonell|first4=Eudald|date=2013-12-06|title=Hominin dispersals from the Jaramillo subchron in central and south-western Europe: Untermassfeld (Germany) and Vallparadís (Spain)|url=http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1040618213001389|journal=Quaternary International|series=Middle to Upper Palaeolithic biological and cultural shift in Eurasia II|volume=316|issue=Supplement C|pages=73–93|doi=10.1016/j.quaint.2013.03.005}}</ref><ref>{{Cite journal|last=Landeck|first=Günter|last2=Garcia Garriga|first2=Joan|date=2016-05-01|title=The oldest hominin butchery in European mid-latitudes at the Jaramillo site of Untermassfeld (Thuringia, Germany)|url=http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0047248416000269|journal=Journal of Human Evolution|volume=94|issue=Supplement C|pages=53–71|doi=10.1016/j.jhevol.2016.02.002}}</ref><ref>{{Cite journal|last=Landeck|first=Günter|last2=Garcia Garriga|first2=Joan|date=2017-04-29|title=New taphonomic data of the 1 Myr hominin butchery at Untermassfeld (Thuringia, Germany)|url=http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1040618216308527|journal=Quaternary International|volume=436|issue=Part A|pages=138–161|doi=10.1016/j.quaint.2016.11.016}}</ref> Günter Landeck and Joan Garcia Garriga claimed to have found evidence for a [[Hominini|hominin]] presence at the site in the form of [[stone tool]]s and butchery marks on bones. If verified, this would be the earliest known occupation of northern Europe by humans, as previous evidence had indicated that Europe was only sporadically occupied, at southerly latitudes, before 500,000 BP.<ref>{{Cite journal|last=Dennell|first=Robin|date=2003-12-01|title=Dispersal and colonisation, long and short chronologies: how continuous is the Early Pleistocene record for hominids outside East Africa?|url=http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0047248403001295|journal=Journal of Human Evolution|volume=45|issue=6|pages=421–440|doi=10.1016/j.jhevol.2003.09.006}}</ref><ref>{{Cite journal|last=Roebroeks|first=Wil|date=2006-07-01|title=The human colonisation of Europe: where are we?|url=http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jqs.1044/abstract|journal=Journal of Quaternary Science|language=en|volume=21|issue=5|pages=425–435|doi=10.1002/jqs.1044|issn=1099-1417}}</ref> However, these findings have sparked a major controversy.<ref name=":0" /><ref name=":1" /><ref name=":2" /> Questions were immediately asked about the [[provenance]] of the material, since neither Landeck nor Garcia Garriga had any connection to the Untermassfeld project and had never worked on the excavations at the site.<ref>{{Cite journal|last=Baales|first=Michael|date=2014-07-09|title=Untermassfeld – Or the struggle for finding the earliest traces of human occupation in Central Europe: A comment on: “Hominin dispersals from the Jaramillo subchron in central and south-western Europe: Untermassfeld (Germany) and Vallparadís (Spain)” by J. Garcia et al., Quaternary International 316 (2013), pp. 73–93|url=http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1040618214003176|journal=Quaternary International|series=Environmental and Cultural Dynamics in Western and Central Europe during the Upper Pleistocene|volume=337|issue=Supplement C|pages=254–256|doi=10.1016/j.quaint.2014.05.021}}</ref>
In a series of papers published between 2013 and 2017,<ref>{{Cite journal|last=Garcia|first=Joan|last2=Landeck|first2=Günter|last3=Martínez|first3=Kenneth|last4=Carbonell|first4=Eudald|date=2013-12-06|title=Hominin dispersals from the Jaramillo subchron in central and south-western Europe: Untermassfeld (Germany) and Vallparadís (Spain)|url=http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1040618213001389|journal=Quaternary International|series=Middle to Upper Palaeolithic biological and cultural shift in Eurasia II|volume=316|issue=Supplement C|pages=73–93|doi=10.1016/j.quaint.2013.03.005}}</ref><ref>{{Cite journal|last=Landeck|first=Günter|last2=Garcia Garriga|first2=Joan|date=2016-05-01|title=The oldest hominin butchery in European mid-latitudes at the Jaramillo site of Untermassfeld (Thuringia, Germany)|url=http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0047248416000269|journal=Journal of Human Evolution|volume=94|issue=Supplement C|pages=53–71|doi=10.1016/j.jhevol.2016.02.002}}</ref><ref>{{Cite journal|last=Landeck|first=Günter|last2=Garcia Garriga|first2=Joan|date=2017-04-29|title=New taphonomic data of the 1 Myr hominin butchery at Untermassfeld (Thuringia, Germany)|url=http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1040618216308527|journal=Quaternary International|volume=436|issue=Part A|pages=138–161|doi=10.1016/j.quaint.2016.11.016}}</ref> Günter Landeck and Joan Garcia Garriga claimed to have found evidence for a [[Hominini|hominin]] presence at the site in the form of [[stone tool]]s and butchery marks on bones. If verified, this would be the earliest known occupation of northern Europe by humans, as previous evidence had indicated that Europe was only sporadically occupied, at southerly latitudes, before 500,000 BP.<ref>{{Cite journal|last=Dennell|first=Robin|date=2003-12-01|title=Dispersal and colonisation, long and short chronologies: how continuous is the Early Pleistocene record for hominids outside East Africa?|url=http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0047248403001295|journal=Journal of Human Evolution|volume=45|issue=6|pages=421–440|doi=10.1016/j.jhevol.2003.09.006}}</ref><ref>{{Cite journal|last=Roebroeks|first=Wil|date=2006-07-01|title=The human colonisation of Europe: where are we?|url=http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jqs.1044/abstract|journal=Journal of Quaternary Science|language=en|volume=21|issue=5|pages=425–435|doi=10.1002/jqs.1044|issn=1099-1417}}</ref> However, these findings have sparked a major controversy.<ref name=":0" /><ref name=":1" /><ref name=":2" /> Questions were immediately asked about the [[provenance]] of the material, since neither Landeck nor Garcia Garriga had any connection to the Untermassfeld project and had never worked on the excavations at the site.<ref>{{Cite journal|last=Baales|first=Michael|date=2014-07-09|title=Untermassfeld – Or the struggle for finding the earliest traces of human occupation in Central Europe: A comment on: “Hominin dispersals from the Jaramillo subchron in central and south-western Europe: Untermassfeld (Germany) and Vallparadís (Spain)” by J. Garcia et al., Quaternary International 316 (2013), pp. 73–93|url=http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1040618214003176|journal=Quaternary International|series=Environmental and Cultural Dynamics in Western and Central Europe during the Upper Pleistocene|volume=337|issue=Supplement C|pages=254–256|doi=10.1016/j.quaint.2014.05.021}}</ref>


Further doubts were raised in October 2017, in a [[preprint]] of a paper authored by several palaeontologists and [[Palaeolithic archaeology|Palaeolithic archaeologists]], including [[Wil Roebroeks]] and Ralf-Dietrich Kahlke, the director of the Untermassfeld excavations.<ref>{{cite biorxiv|last=Roebroeks|first=Wil|last2=Gaudzinski-Windheuser|first2=Sabine|last3=Baales|first3=Michael|last4=Kahlke|first4=Ralf-Dietrich|date=2017-10-31|title=Uneven Data Quality and the Earliest Occupation of Europe: The Case of Untermassfeld (Germany)|biorxiv=211268}}</ref> The authors reported that they were unable to locate the collections Landeck and Garcia Garriga claim to have based their analysis on, even after contacting them. They alleged that the description of some of the bones discussed in Landeck and Garcia Garriga's papers match those in a package anonymously delivered to a local natural history museum; and that two bones matched specific pieces that were reported stolen from the site in 2009 and 2012. Based on a reanalysis of the material in the anonymous package and the details provided in their papers, they also argued that Landeck and Garcia Garriga had misidentified both the stone tools and the butchery marks. They concluded that there was no evidence of a hominin presence at Untermassfeld.<ref name=":0" /><ref name=":1" /><ref name=":2" />
Further doubts were raised in October 2017, in the [[preprint]] of a paper authored by several palaeontologists and [[Palaeolithic archaeology|Palaeolithic archaeologists]], including [[Wil Roebroeks]] and Ralf-Dietrich Kahlke, the director of the Untermassfeld excavations.<ref>{{cite biorxiv|last=Roebroeks|first=Wil|last2=Gaudzinski-Windheuser|first2=Sabine|last3=Baales|first3=Michael|last4=Kahlke|first4=Ralf-Dietrich|date=2017-10-31|title=Uneven Data Quality and the Earliest Occupation of Europe: The Case of Untermassfeld (Germany)|biorxiv=211268}}</ref><ref>{{Cite journal|last=Roebroeks|first=Wil|last2=Gaudzinski-Windheuser|first2=Sabine|last3=Baales|first3=Michael|last4=Kahlke|first4=Ralf-Dietrich|date=2017-12-27|title=Uneven Data Quality and the Earliest Occupation of Europe—the Case of Untermassfeld (Germany)|url=https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s41982-017-0003-5|journal=Journal of Paleolithic Archaeology|language=en|pages=1–27|doi=10.1007/s41982-017-0003-5|issn=2520-8217}}</ref> The authors reported that they were unable to locate the collections Landeck and Garcia Garriga claim to have based their analysis on, even after contacting them. They alleged that the description of some of the bones discussed in Landeck and Garcia Garriga's papers match those in a package anonymously delivered to a local natural history museum; and that two bones matched specific pieces that were reported stolen from the site in 2009 and 2012. Based on a reanalysis of the material in the anonymous package and the details provided in their papers, they also argued that Landeck and Garcia Garriga had misidentified both the stone tools and the butchery marks. They concluded that there was no evidence of a hominin presence at Untermassfeld.<ref name=":0" /><ref name=":1" /><ref name=":2" />


Garcia Garriga has "strenuously denied" the allegations, stating that he had no connection to the material and had only helped write up Landeck's analysis. Landeck claimed that the material was shown to him by two unnamed private collectors who had found it during "rescue activities" near—but not in—the Untermassfeld site. Both told ''Nature'' that they had "nothing to do with a stolen bone" and were writing a detailed response to the allegations.<ref name=":0" /><ref name=":1" />
Garcia Garriga has "strenuously denied" the allegations, stating that he had no connection to the material and had only helped write up Landeck's analysis. Landeck claimed that the material was shown to him by two unnamed private collectors who had found it during "rescue activities" near—but not in—the Untermassfeld site. Both told ''Nature'' that they had "nothing to do with a stolen bone" and were writing a detailed response to the allegations.<ref name=":0" /><ref name=":1" />

Revision as of 13:18, 10 March 2018

The Untermassfeld fossil site is a palaeontological site in Thuringia, Germany. Excavated continuously since its discovery in 1978, it has produced many fossils dating to the late Early Pleistocene or Epivillafranchian geologic period, approximately 1.2 – 0.9 million years before present (BP).[1] Claims that hominins were also present at the site have sparked a major controversy.[2][3][4]

Hominin controversy

In a series of papers published between 2013 and 2017,[5][6][7] Günter Landeck and Joan Garcia Garriga claimed to have found evidence for a hominin presence at the site in the form of stone tools and butchery marks on bones. If verified, this would be the earliest known occupation of northern Europe by humans, as previous evidence had indicated that Europe was only sporadically occupied, at southerly latitudes, before 500,000 BP.[8][9] However, these findings have sparked a major controversy.[2][3][4] Questions were immediately asked about the provenance of the material, since neither Landeck nor Garcia Garriga had any connection to the Untermassfeld project and had never worked on the excavations at the site.[10]

Further doubts were raised in October 2017, in the preprint of a paper authored by several palaeontologists and Palaeolithic archaeologists, including Wil Roebroeks and Ralf-Dietrich Kahlke, the director of the Untermassfeld excavations.[11][12] The authors reported that they were unable to locate the collections Landeck and Garcia Garriga claim to have based their analysis on, even after contacting them. They alleged that the description of some of the bones discussed in Landeck and Garcia Garriga's papers match those in a package anonymously delivered to a local natural history museum; and that two bones matched specific pieces that were reported stolen from the site in 2009 and 2012. Based on a reanalysis of the material in the anonymous package and the details provided in their papers, they also argued that Landeck and Garcia Garriga had misidentified both the stone tools and the butchery marks. They concluded that there was no evidence of a hominin presence at Untermassfeld.[2][3][4]

Garcia Garriga has "strenuously denied" the allegations, stating that he had no connection to the material and had only helped write up Landeck's analysis. Landeck claimed that the material was shown to him by two unnamed private collectors who had found it during "rescue activities" near—but not in—the Untermassfeld site. Both told Nature that they had "nothing to do with a stolen bone" and were writing a detailed response to the allegations.[2][3]

References

  1. ^ Kahlke, Ralf-Dietrich (2006). Untermassfeld: A late Early Pleistocene (Epivillafranchian) fossil site near Meiningen (Thuringia, Germany) and its position in the development of the European mammal fauna. BAR International Series 1578. Oxford: British Archaeological Reports. ISBN 9781841717920.
  2. ^ a b c d Callaway, Ewen (2017-11-16). "Archaeologists say human-evolution study used stolen bone". Nature. 551 (7680): 279–280. doi:10.1038/nature.2017.22984.
  3. ^ a b c d Moody, Oliver (2017-11-15). "Stones, bones and skulduggery: war over 'stolen' early human artefacts". The Times. ISSN 0140-0460. Retrieved 2017-11-24. {{cite news}}: Cite has empty unknown parameter: |dead-url= (help)
  4. ^ a b c Bartels, Meghan (2017-11-13). "Allegations about stolen bones raise doubts about history of early humans in Europe". Newsweek. Retrieved 2017-11-24. {{cite news}}: Cite has empty unknown parameter: |dead-url= (help)
  5. ^ Garcia, Joan; Landeck, Günter; Martínez, Kenneth; Carbonell, Eudald (2013-12-06). "Hominin dispersals from the Jaramillo subchron in central and south-western Europe: Untermassfeld (Germany) and Vallparadís (Spain)". Quaternary International. Middle to Upper Palaeolithic biological and cultural shift in Eurasia II. 316 (Supplement C): 73–93. doi:10.1016/j.quaint.2013.03.005.
  6. ^ Landeck, Günter; Garcia Garriga, Joan (2016-05-01). "The oldest hominin butchery in European mid-latitudes at the Jaramillo site of Untermassfeld (Thuringia, Germany)". Journal of Human Evolution. 94 (Supplement C): 53–71. doi:10.1016/j.jhevol.2016.02.002.
  7. ^ Landeck, Günter; Garcia Garriga, Joan (2017-04-29). "New taphonomic data of the 1 Myr hominin butchery at Untermassfeld (Thuringia, Germany)". Quaternary International. 436 (Part A): 138–161. doi:10.1016/j.quaint.2016.11.016.
  8. ^ Dennell, Robin (2003-12-01). "Dispersal and colonisation, long and short chronologies: how continuous is the Early Pleistocene record for hominids outside East Africa?". Journal of Human Evolution. 45 (6): 421–440. doi:10.1016/j.jhevol.2003.09.006.
  9. ^ Roebroeks, Wil (2006-07-01). "The human colonisation of Europe: where are we?". Journal of Quaternary Science. 21 (5): 425–435. doi:10.1002/jqs.1044. ISSN 1099-1417.
  10. ^ Baales, Michael (2014-07-09). "Untermassfeld – Or the struggle for finding the earliest traces of human occupation in Central Europe: A comment on: "Hominin dispersals from the Jaramillo subchron in central and south-western Europe: Untermassfeld (Germany) and Vallparadís (Spain)" by J. Garcia et al., Quaternary International 316 (2013), pp. 73–93". Quaternary International. Environmental and Cultural Dynamics in Western and Central Europe during the Upper Pleistocene. 337 (Supplement C): 254–256. doi:10.1016/j.quaint.2014.05.021. {{cite journal}}: no-break space character in |title= at position 257 (help)
  11. ^ Roebroeks, Wil; Gaudzinski-Windheuser, Sabine; Baales, Michael; Kahlke, Ralf-Dietrich (2017-10-31). "Uneven Data Quality and the Earliest Occupation of Europe: The Case of Untermassfeld (Germany)". bioRxiv 211268. {{cite bioRxiv}}: Check |biorxiv= value (help)
  12. ^ Roebroeks, Wil; Gaudzinski-Windheuser, Sabine; Baales, Michael; Kahlke, Ralf-Dietrich (2017-12-27). "Uneven Data Quality and the Earliest Occupation of Europe—the Case of Untermassfeld (Germany)". Journal of Paleolithic Archaeology: 1–27. doi:10.1007/s41982-017-0003-5. ISSN 2520-8217.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Untermassfeld_fossil_site&oldid=829731160"