User talk:Shadowowl

Constructive criticism is welcome. Templates are OK, but don't spam me with Guides for Noobs.

08:12:05, 22 March 2018 review of submission by Phantasmagoria65

• Phantasmagoria65 (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:Outrider (television series) (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Phantasmagoria65 (talk) 08:12, 22 March 2018 (UTC)

Hi there. I'm confused about why my article has been declined due to inadequately reliable sources? The series has been officially announced in multiple entertainment publications and websites-- including the three cited in my original article: Daily Variety, The Hollywood Reporter, and Deadline Hollywood. I would appreciate your reconsideration and/or explanation. Thanks.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Blasenburg (March 22)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Heliosxeros was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Blasenburg and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Blasenburg, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and save.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

EROS ^message 13:22, 22 March 2018 (UTC)

Hello, Shadowowl! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! EROS message 13:22, 22 March 2018 (UTC)

Request on 16:58:52, 22 March 2018 for assistance on AfC submission by Ashlee444

• Ashlee444 (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:Johnny Douglas ( Record Producer) (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Hello, I am working on an article for Johnny Douglas (record producer) and it was recently declined due to being too dependent on Disogs. I have found many other sources for proof of his notability including articles in billboard and other music magazines. Many of The songs he has written, produced, composed, remixed etc have charted. He has nominated for an notable award with his work for George Michael. All of this has also been cited. I understand wikipedia discogs is not considered a reliable source however, due to his work being mostly of that of the producer and composer, the majority of his proof his found in the liner notes of ads & albums, hence the discogs references. If I remove these references would the article be approved with his billboard magazine, chart information, award information and the artist websites where he is mentioned as working on their work? I do believe this proves notability on its own based on what i have read about music notability. Or is there a way to cite the albums without using discogs? Thank for your help and reviewing the article! Ashlee444 (talk) 16:58, 22 March 2018 (UTC)Ashlee444

Ashlee444 (talk) 16:58, 22 March 2018 (UTC)