Jump to content

Talk:Popcorn (instrumental): Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Line 26: Line 26:
:The sales and chart performance described in the article are enough to make it notable, almost certainly more notable than any other recording of the song aside from the other two recordings documented in the article. At least one other person has attempted to removes this section in the past, and their argument basically boiled down to that they [[WP:IDL|didn't like]] that version of the song, which is not a valid reason for removing it. [[User:Mwalimu59|mwalimu59]] ([[User talk:Mwalimu59|talk]]) 05:22, 26 January 2013 (UTC)
:The sales and chart performance described in the article are enough to make it notable, almost certainly more notable than any other recording of the song aside from the other two recordings documented in the article. At least one other person has attempted to removes this section in the past, and their argument basically boiled down to that they [[WP:IDL|didn't like]] that version of the song, which is not a valid reason for removing it. [[User:Mwalimu59|mwalimu59]] ([[User talk:Mwalimu59|talk]]) 05:22, 26 January 2013 (UTC)
:: Also, Crazy Frog was a major pop culture icon in the UK, and the album containing the version was released internationally as was the music video on DVD and broadcast. Cover versions should not be disqualified because a) someone doesn't care for it and b) it's not well known in an editor's particular region. If terms of popular awareness, both Hot Butter's and Crazy Frog's versions far outstrip the original recording by Kingsley. [[Special:Contributions/68.146.70.124|68.146.70.124]] ([[User talk:68.146.70.124|talk]]) 00:35, 3 February 2014 (UTC)
:: Also, Crazy Frog was a major pop culture icon in the UK, and the album containing the version was released internationally as was the music video on DVD and broadcast. Cover versions should not be disqualified because a) someone doesn't care for it and b) it's not well known in an editor's particular region. If terms of popular awareness, both Hot Butter's and Crazy Frog's versions far outstrip the original recording by Kingsley. [[Special:Contributions/68.146.70.124|68.146.70.124]] ([[User talk:68.146.70.124|talk]]) 00:35, 3 February 2014 (UTC)
::: Actually the crazy frog version is a remix of Captain Hollywood's version axel f 2003, with added crazy frog vocals and removed rap. go listen. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5WV7c3YvbFE [[Special:Contributions/74.211.60.216|74.211.60.216]] ([[User talk:74.211.60.216|talk]]) 06:29, 29 March 2018 (UTC)


== request ==
== request ==

Revision as of 06:29, 29 March 2018

WikiProject iconSongs Start‑class
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Songs, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of songs on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
StartThis article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

Changes to the lead

Someone evidently thought they were writing for a college paper and not an encyclopedia when they added the history of how the song got its name to the lead, so I've reworded it to sound more professional. Regarding the issue with Kraftwerk, apparently this is a very common misconception - I wonder if it shouldn't be acknowledged in the article that sources that indicate the band recorded the song are in error? 70.72.223.215 (talk) 16:50, 25 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

There is an element of WP:OR here, but it is puzzling why Kraftwerk keeps on getting credited with the M & H Band version [1] when it is not known to be on one of their albums or singles.--♦IanMacM♦ (talk to me) 21:08, 25 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • Another thing that the article could consider mentioning is that the best known version by Hot Butter in 1972 is not a note for note transcription of the 1969 Gershon Kingsley version. It has some subtle but significant differences, and the arpeggio/organ with vibrato theme in the middle section of the Hot Butter version is not present on the Kingsley version at all. This may be Stan Free's own creation, as he was basically the driving force behind the 1972 track.--♦IanMacM♦ (talk to me) 21:39, 25 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I'd like to note that between the lead and the background section, there are two different origins for the title. They seemingly conflict with one another, this may need to be verified. Centrisian (talk) 15:31, 28 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Title is "Pop Corn" -- two words

Look at the photo of the single. 86.161.112.53 (talk) 19:31, 13 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This sleeve is misleading, it is usually spelled and listed as one word, eg here on the original Pye single.--♦IanMacM♦ (talk to me) 19:58, 13 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
It should still be acknowledged, so I added a note about this. Why isn't the original sleeve illustrated? 68.146.70.124 (talk) 00:30, 3 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
No, it is not misleading. The original song is spelled ALWAYS with two words - look at any of the sleeves: https://www.discogs.com/Gershon-Kingsley-Music-To-Moog-By/master/137913 --Ondrejsv (talk) 20:32, 25 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
What seems to have happened is that Hot Butter's 1972 version used the spelling Popcorn (all one word) and since then it has become the standard way of naming the song. The version on Music to Moog By used the spelling Pop Corn, but has run into problems with WP:COMMONNAME.--♦IanMacM♦ (talk to me) 05:10, 26 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

"Crazy Frog version" is not notable

There are hundreds of covers of this song[1]. The article lists dozens of them[2]. Crazy Frog's cover is listed among them, but it does not merit an entire section. I'd like to remove it for lacking notability. 76.119.237.248 (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 02:02, 26 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The sales and chart performance described in the article are enough to make it notable, almost certainly more notable than any other recording of the song aside from the other two recordings documented in the article. At least one other person has attempted to removes this section in the past, and their argument basically boiled down to that they didn't like that version of the song, which is not a valid reason for removing it. mwalimu59 (talk) 05:22, 26 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Also, Crazy Frog was a major pop culture icon in the UK, and the album containing the version was released internationally as was the music video on DVD and broadcast. Cover versions should not be disqualified because a) someone doesn't care for it and b) it's not well known in an editor's particular region. If terms of popular awareness, both Hot Butter's and Crazy Frog's versions far outstrip the original recording by Kingsley. 68.146.70.124 (talk) 00:35, 3 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Actually the crazy frog version is a remix of Captain Hollywood's version axel f 2003, with added crazy frog vocals and removed rap. go listen. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5WV7c3YvbFE 74.211.60.216 (talk) 06:29, 29 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

request

is it possible to do a summary of the video for the Crazy Frog version of the song? Visokor (talk) 06:27, 5 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Barthezz

Barthezz track "On the move", featuring very similar melody and sound to this one. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 193.144.102.201 (talk) 16:03, 17 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Videos

Can anyone confirm if this is the real music video for Gershon Kingsley's version? I'm skeptical that RKO and Paramount Pictures funded for the music video. Link is here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OSRCemf2JHc

Additionally, there is a French video that shows six people dancing to the Hot Butter rendition: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YfdLh0MHqKw ElMeroEse (talk) 06:44, 15 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 8 external links on Popcorn (instrumental). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:56, 24 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Popcorn (instrumental). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:41, 5 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]