Jump to content

User talk:BlueMoonset: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Seiya (talk | contribs)
Line 85: Line 85:


{{talkquote|i=y|GA nominee nominator field needs links to both user and user talk pages; adding the latter}} Just as a heads up, the GA bot recognized my signature before [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Hamidou_Maiga&curid=56943063&diff=834828587&oldid=834562622 your edit] but didn't afterwards (thus I never got a notification that the review passed). I know it's finicky, so I don't know why this is the case, but wanted to let you know. I'm planning to use {{tl|user0}} as my signature in future GAN templates as a workaround. Alternatively, I'm not sure where it's written that user and talk pages must be both directly linked in the template, but especially since my userpage redirects to my talk, could just leave it as it was. <small>(not [[Help:Watchlist|watching]], please <code>{{tl|ping}}</code>)</small> <span style="background:#F0F0FF; padding:3px 9px 4px">[[User talk:Czar|<span style='font:bold small-caps 1.2em Avenir;color:#B048B5'>czar</span>]]</span> 13:24, 7 April 2018 (UTC)
{{talkquote|i=y|GA nominee nominator field needs links to both user and user talk pages; adding the latter}} Just as a heads up, the GA bot recognized my signature before [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Hamidou_Maiga&curid=56943063&diff=834828587&oldid=834562622 your edit] but didn't afterwards (thus I never got a notification that the review passed). I know it's finicky, so I don't know why this is the case, but wanted to let you know. I'm planning to use {{tl|user0}} as my signature in future GAN templates as a workaround. Alternatively, I'm not sure where it's written that user and talk pages must be both directly linked in the template, but especially since my userpage redirects to my talk, could just leave it as it was. <small>(not [[Help:Watchlist|watching]], please <code>{{tl|ping}}</code>)</small> <span style="background:#F0F0FF; padding:3px 9px 4px">[[User talk:Czar|<span style='font:bold small-caps 1.2em Avenir;color:#B048B5'>czar</span>]]</span> 13:24, 7 April 2018 (UTC)
==Royal Tenenbaums==
I have checked the sources and they seemed fine to me. I could not detect any significant problems to address in the article. You are of course entitled to do another review, if you do not trust my judgement. Anyway, thanks for the info. If I ever do a GA review again, I will take these points into consideration.--[[User:Seiya|Seiya]] ([[User talk:Seiya|talk]]) 13:37, 9 April 2018 (UTC)

Revision as of 13:37, 9 April 2018

This editor is an Auspicious Looshpah and is entitled to display this Book of All Knowledge with Secret Appendix.


Nolder

Thanks, I created that article and missed the time frame to advance the article, because of work. Could you help? Thanks.842U (talk) 00:37, 23 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

842U, you said you were still interested in pursuing this nomination, yet it's been over a week since this was posted and you have yet to respond to the issues raised. Please respond at your next opportunity. Thank you. BlueMoonset (talk) 03:10, 6 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
I went and looked at the nomination and when I read that someone of was accusing me of copying the Italian Nolder article, I just decided it wasn't worth it. I wouldn't copy another article, and furhter more, there is no Italian Nolder article. I didn't copy anything. A while back, I had noticed that it was getting harder and harder to get a DID YOU KNOW article succesfully nominated. But to be accused of copying another article is beyond the pale. Thanks but no thanks. 842U (talk) 21:14, 7 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Review request

Hi BlueMoonset, could I ask if you could review ALT7 at Template:Did you know nominations/Christ the Lord Is Risen Today for me please? I ask as I am desperate for this to appear on DYK on Sunday and made the article improvements specially for it. The C of E God Save the Queen! (talk) 16:47, 26 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

DYK nominations/Answer

Hello! Thank you for your message. I want to complete the nomination process. I still interested in pursuing DYK so I will do that process in the near future.

Thank you very much.--Yeon So Jeong (talk) 13:20, 27 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Seven years of editing

Hey, BlueMoonset. I'd like to wish you a wonderful First Edit Day on behalf of the Wikipedia Birthday Committee!
Have a great day!
Chris Troutman (talk) 15:39, 27 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you, Chris troutman. Much appreciated! BlueMoonset (talk) 16:17, 27 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Help

Hi, what am I supposed to do about a new user who refuses to list the criteria he checks? See Template:Did you know nominations/Speed skating at the 1924 Winter Olympics – Men's 500 metres. Yoninah (talk) 19:06, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

7 days or 7*24 hrs?

Hey, could you please take a look at this nomination? Regards. --Mhhossein talk 07:52, 31 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Mhhossein, I've just posted there; it's "within the past seven days", not 168 hours. If you hadn't already requested a new reviewer, I would have. BlueMoonset (talk) 08:47, 31 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Determining number of DYK nominations

Hi, Gerda Arendt has asked for a 200-nomination DYK award, but does not have a dedicated page listing all the credits. Is there a way to search for her DYK nominations and see how many there are? Thanks, Yoninah (talk) 23:26, 1 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Yoninah, I'm afraid I've never been involved in that area of DYK, so I don't know how you'd count the nominations. (This is nominations of articles other than one's own, right?) It might be possible to search for created templates, but then a self-nomination and a nomination of another's creation/expansion look the same. If there are ways other than brute force drudgery, I'm afraid I don't know what they are. Sorry I can't help with this one. BlueMoonset (talk) 02:45, 2 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
This time with ping. Sorry about that, Yoninah. BlueMoonset (talk) 02:46, 2 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Well, the QPQ check says she has 1215 credits. If she has just reached 1000 DYK creation credits, could I assume the other 200 are her DYK nominations? Yoninah (talk) 14:17, 2 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
It's up to you, Yoninah. Whatever you think best. Truly, this is one area of DYK where I have no interest nor involvement. BlueMoonset (talk) 18:01, 2 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

March 2018 drive bling

The Minor Barnstar
This barnstar is awarded to BlueMoonset for copy edits totaling between 1 and 3,999 words (including bonus and rollover words) during the GOCE March 2018 Backlog Elimination Drive. Congratulations, and thank you for your contributions! Miniapolis 19:30, 3 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I need your help for DYK nomination.

Hello, BlueMoonset! I sent the message that I will continue to complete the process of DYK nomination last time. Then, I tried it again but It was hard to do. So I want to know in detail how can I complete the nomination process. I need your help! I'll be looking forward to your reply. --Yeon So Jeong (talk) 05:50, 5 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Yeon So Jeong, right now your nomination at Template:Did you know nominations/Jeju Oreum is waiting for a reviewer, which has to be someone who isn't involved with the nomination. Until that person shows up, there is nothing for you to do. Eventually a reviewer will start working, and will mention anything that you need to do at that time. Best of luck, and please be patient! BlueMoonset (talk) 06:15, 5 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

GA nominee nominator field needs links to both user and user talk pages; adding the latter

Just as a heads up, the GA bot recognized my signature before your edit but didn't afterwards (thus I never got a notification that the review passed). I know it's finicky, so I don't know why this is the case, but wanted to let you know. I'm planning to use {{user0}} as my signature in future GAN templates as a workaround. Alternatively, I'm not sure where it's written that user and talk pages must be both directly linked in the template, but especially since my userpage redirects to my talk, could just leave it as it was. (not watching, please {{ping}}) czar 13:24, 7 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Royal Tenenbaums

I have checked the sources and they seemed fine to me. I could not detect any significant problems to address in the article. You are of course entitled to do another review, if you do not trust my judgement. Anyway, thanks for the info. If I ever do a GA review again, I will take these points into consideration.--Seiya (talk) 13:37, 9 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]