User talk:Xevus11

Servitor (chaos magic)

Hi Xevus11, thanks for the review, I'll try and improve the page. I'd like some clarification though, if possible. Which parts of the page do you feel refer to Wikipedia as a source? As far as I can see, every statement references an external source. Rune370 (talk) 22:41, 23 June 2018 (UTC)

@Rune370: Hmm, looks like you're right. I've never seen a reflist structured quite like that. I'll remove the tag and take another look. Thanks for letting me know, Xevus11 (talk) 22:44, 23 June 2018 (UTC)

Thanks Xevus11, you're right, that is a marked improvement. Rune370 (talk) 07:26, 24 June 2018 (UTC)

When will Josy be allowed on Wikipedia?

I might have drawn, created, and posted the Josy the rabbit thing comics myself but why does the Wikipedia article for it have to be deleted? I mean what if Comedy Central tried to edit their own Wikipedia article is that not allowed? Emiship'05 (talk) 16:59, 24 June 2018 (UTC)

@Emiship'05: An article needs "verifiable, objective evidence that the subject has received significant attention from independent sources to support a claim of notability" as described in Wikipedia:Notability. In addition, it is considered criteria for speedy deletion to create an article about something you or someone you know has created. This criteria can be overruled by significant coverage in some circumstances, however. To answer your example, no it would not be allowed for Comedy Central to edit their own wikipedia page, under Wikipedia:Conflict of interest, and they could have their edits reversed and the account blocked. I should let you know that attempting to recreate this page again may result in administrator action, as you hve recreated a page made by User:Emilyiship'05, and this could look like sockpuppeting or block evasion if you continue. That having been said, if you feel your comic has generated significant enough coverage to warrant a wikipedia page, you can always submit it down at Wikipedia:Articles for creation to get it made. If you have any other questions about article creation or other parts of wikipedia, feel free to ask at the Wikipedia:Teahouse or Wikipedia:Help desk. Happy editing, Xevus11 (talk) 19:17, 24 June 2018 (UTC)

@Xevus11: User:Emiship'05 and User:Emilyiship'05 are the same person as per this page . Kpgjhpjm 06:35, 25 June 2018 (UTC)

I am aware, however as the old account was temp blocked and had pair of articles (including the one that I nominated for deletion) previously deleted, it wont look good to an admin, and I wanted to make sure Emiship'05 was aware of this. Xevus11 (talk) 23:06, 25 June 2018 (UTC)

File:James Cyriax.jpg

Template:Non free image to be reduced RonBot (talk) 17:13, 24 June 2018 (UTC)

There were no bare links

[1] You tagged it for bare URLs, but there were none, I used refill already. Did your Page Curation tools give you a warning message by mistake? Dream Focus 01:05, 25 June 2018 (UTC)

@Dream Focus:My mistake, I thought that bare URLs referred to all citations without a relatively full citation, and that simply having the article title didn't qualify as non-bare. Ill change it going forward, thanks.Xevus11 (talk) 01:08, 25 June 2018 (UTC)

Deletion of Katalin von Feuchtersleben

Hi, I am MVA33. Following up with what you said about the page. As I am "New" to writing for Wikipedia, I wasn't aware of the "No Infobox without writing" and so fawth. I completely understand and would like to apolagise. If you would like more written I can, I just need a bit more time. Thank you. if you have anymore questions just let me know on my talk page —Preceding undated comment added 22:33, 25 June 2018 (UTC)

@MVA33: Its no trouble, if you have citations and text for it, feel free to create the page. Nobody ever feels offended or angry when deleting pages as part of the New Page Patrol, its just following the guidelines here: Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion. Happy editing, Xevus11 (talk) 22:50, 25 June 2018 (UTC).

Ispolkom

Please do not delete Ispolkom, I cannot see what was the trouble 8 years ago. I have very good sources. Intend to continue. It's hardly a synonym for "executive committee". Boeing720 (talk) 05:07, 26 June 2018 (UTC) Also see Alexander Kerensky - February Revolution part. Boeing720 (talk) 05:09, 26 June 2018 (UTC)

@Boeing720:The deletion tag was for no-content only. If you have added content, feel free to remove the tag. Xevus11 (talk) 17:39, 26 June 2018 (UTC)

Yes I thought so too. But the history file reveals that there has been an article in 2010 however, which for unknown reasons had been redirected to the general article Executive Committee.

Otherwise, good of you to be alert on vandalism. Thanks! Boeing720 (talk) 01:27, 27 June 2018 (UTC)

Huh, thats very strange. I'v seen that once or twice before, guess I just didnt catch it this time. Weird.Xevus11 (talk) 01:28, 27 June 2018 (UTC)

I have unreviewed a page you curated

Hi, I'm PamD. I wanted to let you know that I saw the page you reviewed, James Cyriax, and have un-reviewed it again. If you have any questions, please ask them on my talk page. Thank you.

Page Deletion

Hello, Xevus. Actually most of the sources on the net are either copyright books or blogs and it's very difficult to find an independent source for this particular article. I tried finding sources that were reliable but to no avail. This is the second time this page is being deleted and I still don't have the sources. I could add info but that would be without sources based on my personal information, if not then you can delete the page I have no problem. Shawrix (talk) 05:57, 27 June 2018 (UTC)

PamD 07:58, 19 June 2018 (UTC)