Talk:Timeline of the Magellan expedition: Difference between revisions
Line 19: | Line 19: | ||
This isn't very helpful... but this is a damn poor article on one of the most famous nautical events in history, no background no details it's just bad. <!-- Template:Unsigned IP --><small class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/2A00:23C4:AA0C:2700:9D79:1576:565A:5452|2A00:23C4:AA0C:2700:9D79:1576:565A:5452]] ([[User talk:2A00:23C4:AA0C:2700:9D79:1576:565A:5452#top|talk]]) 13:59, 30 June 2017 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
This isn't very helpful... but this is a damn poor article on one of the most famous nautical events in history, no background no details it's just bad. <!-- Template:Unsigned IP --><small class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/2A00:23C4:AA0C:2700:9D79:1576:565A:5452|2A00:23C4:AA0C:2700:9D79:1576:565A:5452]] ([[User talk:2A00:23C4:AA0C:2700:9D79:1576:565A:5452#top|talk]]) 13:59, 30 June 2017 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
||
And the Date they left Rio de Janeiro: December 32, seriously? This is a shame of an article. |
|||
== Details in [[Magellan]] article == |
== Details in [[Magellan]] article == |
Revision as of 10:48, 17 July 2018
![]() | Spain Start‑class Mid‑importance | |||||||||
|
![]() | Tambayan Philippines Start‑class Mid‑importance | |||||||||
|
Prose
This could be presented better using prose, but I won't use a template because the title says "timeline" which usually don't have prose. Mr. Spink talk★contribs 14:52, 2 March 2016 (UTC)
Prose 2
I want to write about the voyage in prose, using the Bergreen book among others as a source, with thorough citations. Seeing as the title does not suggest that this is a timeline, and that an article covering the voyage itself is missing, I see no problems with it. Does anyone object? If not, then I'll start this week.--Simen113 (talk) 14:57, 11 September 2016 (UTC)
- Okay I will now start writing this article in prose since no objections were noted. @Ekem: I will keep the timeline at the bottom, and elaborate and cite it. Any objections from your part, since you created the article? @Mr. Spink:, thought I'd notify you too --Simen113 (talk) 18:10, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
- @Simen113:, I wish you the best luck and hope you do well to convert the article. Mr. Spink talk★contribs 19:15, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
Poor
This isn't very helpful... but this is a damn poor article on one of the most famous nautical events in history, no background no details it's just bad. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A00:23C4:AA0C:2700:9D79:1576:565A:5452 (talk) 13:59, 30 June 2017 (UTC)
And the Date they left Rio de Janeiro: December 32, seriously? This is a shame of an article.
Details in Magellan article
Although the Ferdinand Magellan article points to this one as the "main" article, that article is considerably comprehensive and has more information than this one.
I suggest that this one be renamed "Timeline of the Magellan–Elcano_circumnavigation" since that is more of what it actually is. NumberC35 (talk) 20:16, 5 October 2017 (UTC)
- I am currently expanding this to prose.--Simen113 (talk) 20:27, 5 October 2017 (UTC)