Jump to content

User talk:MartinHarper: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
→‎A barnstar for you!: new WikiLove message
Tag: wikilove
Line 101: Line 101:
{{clear}}
{{clear}}
</div> [[User:SandSsandwich|SandSsandwich]] ([[User talk:SandSsandwich|talk]]) 07:06, 10 July 2018 (UTC)
</div> [[User:SandSsandwich|SandSsandwich]] ([[User talk:SandSsandwich|talk]]) 07:06, 10 July 2018 (UTC)

== A barnstar for you! ==

{| style="background-color: #fdffe7; border: 1px solid #fceb92;"
|rowspan="2" style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 5px;" | [[File:Original Barnstar Hires.png|100px]]
|style="font-size: x-large; padding: 3px 3px 0 3px; height: 1.5em;" | '''The Original Barnstar'''
|-
|style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 3px;" | Your invention. [[User:SandSsandwich|<font color="#A6800C">SandSsandwich</font>]] 11:31, 22 July 2018 (UTC)
|}

Revision as of 11:31, 22 July 2018


I do get emails from Talk messages, so by all means try to contact me here. Martin (talk) 23:42, 21 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding the article sexual desire

Hello, i was reading the article Sexual desire of which you are a contributor,Sir..Under the para PHYSICAL FACTORS AFFECTING SEXUAL DESIRE i was expecting the find something about the 'time that has passed from the previous ejaculation in men'(being the reason that during the short term abstinence in sexually active men, they feel a high urge to indulge in sexual activities) affects their sexual desire..but there is no mention of the specific thing in the article..i have been anxious about this as i have to continue my research project on libido.. Sir, can you please help me find out the reason for why could i not find this fact here..many thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ed beerman (talkcontribs) 08:29, 21 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I recommend you research the issue and, after finding the appropriate references, add the information to the article. You can also discuss at Talk:Sexual desire. Martin (talk) 23:42, 21 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, Sir.. How can i know who wrote about factors affecting sexual desire..? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ed beerman (talkcontribs) 12:52, 22 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nazi gun control

Hey, in working on a recent arbcom case, I found your diff from 2003 [1] . the "nazi's used gun control" is the subject of a very big debate currently, and you might want to drop in and give some historical perspective. Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Gun_control/Evidence Gaijin42 (talk) 22:09, 23 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Old sockpuppet case

Also regarding 2003 stuff, and as someone who probably interacted with both, what do you think of the theory that User:Mark Richards was a EoT sockpuppet? Mostly of historical interest now. Funny how many other "suspects" there were, is there even one list of them all? Probably not.

Just to let you know -- Missing Wikipedians

You have been mentioned at Wikipedia:Missing Wikipedians. XOttawahitech (talk) 19:57, 14 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I've removed your name, because of the edit you've made ... you're not really *missing* because we know where you are. :-) Graham87 06:16, 15 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Invitation to join the Ten Year Society

Dear Martin,

I'd like to extend a cordial invitation to you to join the Ten Year Society, an informal group for editors who've been participating in the Wikipedia project for ten years or more. Nice to see that you've not completely left us.

Best regards, — Scott talk 18:51, 12 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

The Original Barnstar
You invented this! Godisgood737 (talk) 15:21, 2 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Just to let you know -- Missing Wikipedians

You have been mentioned at Wikipedia:Missing Wikipedians. Ottawahitech (talk) 22:07, 22 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Knowledge for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Knowledge is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Knowledge until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Mr. Guye (talk) 03:21, 1 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 08:51, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Bilingualism

Hello MartinHarper,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Bilingualism for deletion, because it doesn't appear to contain any encyclopedic content. Take a look at our suggestions for essential content in short articles to learn what should be included.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Rampage470 (talk) 12:40, 9 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

List of articles about unsolved problems listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect List of articles about unsolved problems. Since you had some involvement with the List of articles about unsolved problems redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. - CHAMPION (talk) (contributions) (logs) 04:58, 9 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Capitals of the Netherlands listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Capitals of the Netherlands. Since you had some involvement with the Capitals of the Netherlands redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Thryduulf (talk) 23:22, 20 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Lists of people by occupation, which you created, is being discussed for deletion. Softlavender (talk) 09:06, 4 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The article Anarchists (film) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unsourced since 2004. Single review in Rotten Tomatoes, no additional reviews/sources to take from the Korean WP article. Lacks significant coverage in multiple reliable, independent sources. (?) No suitable redirect targets.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. czar 01:53, 4 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

SandSsandwich (talk) 07:06, 10 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

The Original Barnstar
Your invention. SandSsandwich 11:31, 22 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]